Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.08.23.609480

GeneDrive.jl: A decision tool to optimize vector-borne disease management planning under climate change

Vasquez, V. N.·Mordecai, E. A.·Anthoff, D.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce GeneDrive.jl, the first software package to optimize operational planning for the biological control of mosquito disease vectors. Mosquitoes are responsible for transmitting a significant percentage of the global infectious disease burden, a problem being exacerbated as climate change shifts the range and alters the abundance of these thermo-sensitive arthropods. But the efficacy and cost of vector control varies according to species, region, and intervention type. Meanwhile, existing computational tools lack the ability to explicitly tailor interventions for local health objectives and resource limitations. GeneDrive.jl addresses this equity and efficiency gap, which is of particular concern for the under- resourced nations that both bear the highest mosquito-borne disease burden and are subject to disproportionate climate impacts. The software customizes management strategies according to specific health goals and financial constraints, and can also be used to characterize risk by analyzing the temperature-responsive dynamics of wildtype vectors. GeneDrive.jl is designed to accommodate two important realities shaping the future of vector-borne disease: first, the genetic-based technologies that are defining a new era in control, and second, the uncertainty that increasingly variable and extreme temperatures bring for the climate-sensitive illnesses transmitted by mosquitoes. The software provides a build once, solve twice feature wherein users may define a health management problem, optimize it, and subsequently subject outcomes to scenario-based testing within a single coherent platform. We demonstrate the policy relevance of this scalable open-source framework via case studies featuring Aedes aegypti in the dengue-endemic region of Nha Trang, Vietnam. Author SummaryWe present a software package designed to optimize and simulate genetic biocontrol, a broad suite of technologies that alter the genotype or phenotype of mosquito disease vectors by suppressing or wholly replacing vector populations. Our GeneDrive.jl library responds to a need for the fast, temperature- sensitive, low-cost exploration of public health management options, particularly in under-resourced global regions most at risk for current and future mosquito-borne illness under climate change. It is the first software to offer mathematical methods that optimally tune intervention strategies to local human health goals and resource limitations. Additional mathematical methods within GeneDrive.jl permit the simulation of optimized results given alternative parameterizations, furnishing a unique and scientifically important capacity to subject outcomes to scenario-based testing. The software is constructed to evolve along with the latest science, prioritizing composability{perp} and modularity{perp} to enable iterative updates without requiring a full rewrite. GeneDrive.jl addresses the confluence of two rapidly changing realities - existing and projected climate warming, together with advancements in biocontrol technology - when the state of the art, namely past field work and expert opinion, are no longer reliable guides for future planning. This paper is intended for an interdisciplinary audience and includes a Glossary to facilitate reading (see{perp}).

Explore related subjects

ecologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vasquez, V. N., Mordecai, E. A., Anthoff, D.. 2024-08-26. GeneDrive.jl: A decision tool to optimize vector-borne disease management planning under climate change. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.609480

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Wildfires drive trade-offs in ammonia-oxidizing groups and promote denitrification to increase soil emissions of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O) in California chaparral

Wildfires can promote trade-offs in soil nitrifier and denitrifier communities that affect post-fire nitrogen (N) cycling and emissions of nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N2O), and dinitrogen (N2). For example, by increasing soil pH and ammonium (NH4+), wildfires could increase the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) over archaea (AOA). Because AOB and AOA process N differently, nitrifier trade-offs may affect N emissions and nitrate (NO3-) supply with downstream effects on denitrifier activity, leading us to ask: Do trade-offs between AOA and AOB abundance and shifts in denitrifying processes influence N emissions over time after wildfire? We selectively inhibited AOA and AOB communities from soil collected over four seasonal time points one year before and after a chaparral wildfire and used stable isotopes to parse denitrifier contributions to N2O emissions. Over one year after the wildfire, soil pH increased from 6.1 to 7.0, soil extractable NH4+ increased 30-fold, NO3- increased 5-fold, and NO2- increased 9-fold. AOB amoA gene copy numbers increased 20-fold one year after fire, while AOA abundance remained unchanged. Post-fire soil NO emissions increased 63-fold over one year, with varied contributions from all nitrifier groups. Soil N2O emissions peaked eight months after fire (2271 {+/-} 634 ng N2O-N g-1 soil), with increased contributions from AOA. Wildfire increased {delta}15NSPN2O and {delta}15NbulkN2O values, suggesting increased N2O reduction to N2. Overall, wildfire increased AOB abundance relative to AOA, promoting nitrification activity and providing intermediates to denitrifiers to increase emissions of NO and N2O for up to one year after fire.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

Global urban forest cover and nature access is insufficient for human wellbeing and worsening

Target 12 of the Global Biodiversity Framework urges governments to enhance human access to nature to improve human wellbeing. Here, we study nature access using several metrics for a globally representative sample of 140 large Functional Urban Areas, examining variation among regions and over time. We find most urbanites globally do not reach common benchmarks for urban forest cover and nature access. Globally, 3.3 billion people (76% of urbanites) live in urban areas that do not have at least 30% tree canopy cover. Moreover, 1.1 billion people (23% of urbanites) are farther than 1 km from a park as identified in Open Street Map, and 1.5 billion people (36% of all urbanites) are more than 1 km from a green patch as defined by land cover. Over time, urban nature access has declined. Between 1992 and 2020, most urban residents had an increase in the distance to green patches (63% of urbanites increased, average increase 680 m). Similarly, between 1992 and 2020, 31% of urbanites had a decrease in percent natural cover, while only 1.3% had an increase. We show that the variation among cities or regions in the amount of nature access depends on the metric used and the context. On average, mesic climates have more tree cover than do arid climates, and cities with lower GDP or higher population density tend to have lower natural share than other cities. Our results suggest that global urban nature access is insufficient for supporting human health and worsening over time.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

Exploring soil microbes' potential to assess Atlantic Forest restoration trajectories

Soil microbe communities are key indicators of ecosystem recovery, yet their integration into operational restoration monitoring remains limited. We evaluated the potential for benchmarking early Atlantic Forest restoration with reference site-based comparisons using bacteria and fungi. Samples were collected from three geographic clusters and spanned a pasture-restoration-forest land-use gradient. Using metabarcoding, we assessed whether soil microbe community diversity, structure, and functional profiles respond to restoration progress considering influences from spatial arrangement and/or successional stage (determined using NDVI). We found that OTU alpha diversity was not explained by either predictor, whereas the Shannon diversity of bacterial functions declined significantly with increasing NDVI. Bacterial and fungal OTU composition (Bray-Curtis) responded significantly to both NDVI and geographic cluster, as did microbe functional profiles, although only NDVI proved both marginally and conditionally significant. We also found that soil chemical parameters were primarily structured by geographic cluster but not by NDVI, suggesting that many abiotic edaphic conditions reflect soil history rather than current vegetation status. These findings suggest that both microbe taxonomic and functional metrics track revegetation progress and validate eDNA as a scalable, sensitive restoration monitoring framework. Importantly, our results also support the use of reference site-based monitoring for Atlantic Forest restoration.

ecology↗