The interplay between dormant mutated cells and tumor promotion by chronic tissue damage in determining cancer risk.

Abstract

While the causal role of mutagenic carcinogens in tumor development is well established, the relative contribution of environmental tumor promoting factors, wounding, and chronic inflammation is still unclear. Recent sequencing studies have suggested that most environmental carcinogens act as promoters rather than through mechanisms that involve direct induction of point mutations, but whether cancer risk factors such as obesity, chronic inflammation, wounding, or tumor promoters contribute directly or indirectly to mutation burden, or induce novel signatures, has not been investigated. Here, we present WGS analysis of over 100 mouse skin tumors to compare the effects of exposure to mutagens, the tumor promoter TPA, chronic wounding, obesity, or chemotherapy, on mutational burden and cancer risk. All tumors initiated by the carcinogen Dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) show a very strong A>T mutational signature (SBS.DMBA) attributable to a single exposure to this carcinogen. The number of SBS.DMBA mutations also showed a strong correlation with the "clock" signature SBS5, suggesting that one treatment with this mutagen can induce mutational signatures attributed to endogenous processes. No specific signatures could be attributed to obesity, high fat diet, wounding, or TPA. Cells carrying thousands of mutations persist over very long periods without inducing tumors or causing pathological changes but can give rise to tumors after short term exposure to TPA. Furthermore, normal cell turnover and proliferation during fetal and adult growth, is not sufficient for promotion, but tissue damage followed by regenerative proliferation seems to be required for tumor development. We conclude that tumor promoters, chronic inflammation, wounding, and obesity do not contribute significantly to tumor mutational burden, and that the rate-limiting determinant of tumor growth is exposure to a tumor promoter rather than the nature or number of genomic point mutations. These data are highly relevant to the recent demonstration of persistent oncogenic mutations in histologically normal human tissues during ageing.