Balmain, A. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2019

Regulation of KRAS4A/B splicing in cancer stem cells by the RBM39 splicing complex.

The KRAS oncogene is expressed as major KRAS4B and minor KRAS4A splice isoforms, the distinct functions of which in cancer are unknown. We demonstrate here that KRAS4A is enriched in cancer stem-like cells, and is activated by hypoxia, whereas KRAS4B is more widely expressed and responds to ER stress. Mice completely lacking either isoform are viable but resistant to lung cancer development, as are Kras4A/B double heterozygous mice expressing both isoforms, but in which splice regulation has been uncoupled. Splicing of KRAS4A, but not KRAS4B, in human tumor cells can be inhibited by treatment with the splice inhibitor indisulam, or by CRISPR/Cas inhibition of the RBM39 splicing complex. Our data suggest that control of KRAS4A/B splicing is a targetable vulnerability in KRAS mutant tumors.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Integration of pathway, cellular and genetic context reveals principles of synthetic lethality that affect reproducibility

Synthetic lethal screens have the potential to identify new vulnerabilities incurred by specific cancer mutations but have been hindered by lack of agreement between studies. Using KRAS as a model, we identified that published synthetic lethal screens significantly overlap at the pathway rather than gene level. Analysis of pathways encoded as protein networks identified synthetic lethal candidates that were more reproducible than those previously reported. Lack of overlap likely stems from biological rather than technical limitations as most synthetic lethal phenotypes were strongly modulated by changes in cellular conditions or genetic context, the latter determined using a pairwise genetic interaction map that identified numerous interactions that suppress synthetic lethal effects. Accounting for pathway, cellular and genetic context nominates a DNA repair dependency in KRAS-mutant cells, mediated by a network containing BRCA1. We provide evidence for why most reported synthetic lethals are not reproducible which is addressable using a multi-faceted testing framework.\n\nSTATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCESynthetic lethal screens have the power to identify new targets in cancer, although have thus far come up short of expectation. We use computational and experimental approaches to delineate principles for identifying robust synthetic lethal targets that could aid in the development of effective new therapeutic strategies for genetically defined cancers.

cancer biology↗