Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bayani, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Bayani, N..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The interplay between dormant mutated cells and tumor promotion by chronic tissue damage in determining cancer risk.

While the causal role of mutagenic carcinogens in tumor development is well established, the relative contribution of environmental tumor promoting factors, wounding, and chronic inflammation is still unclear. Recent sequencing studies have suggested that most environmental carcinogens act as promoters rather than through mechanisms that involve direct induction of point mutations, but whether cancer risk factors such as obesity, chronic inflammation, wounding, or tumor promoters contribute directly or indirectly to mutation burden, or induce novel signatures, has not been investigated. Here, we present WGS analysis of over 100 mouse skin tumors to compare the effects of exposure to mutagens, the tumor promoter TPA, chronic wounding, obesity, or chemotherapy, on mutational burden and cancer risk. All tumors initiated by the carcinogen Dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) show a very strong A>T mutational signature (SBS.DMBA) attributable to a single exposure to this carcinogen. The number of SBS.DMBA mutations also showed a strong correlation with the "clock" signature SBS5, suggesting that one treatment with this mutagen can induce mutational signatures attributed to endogenous processes. No specific signatures could be attributed to obesity, high fat diet, wounding, or TPA. Cells carrying thousands of mutations persist over very long periods without inducing tumors or causing pathological changes but can give rise to tumors after short term exposure to TPA. Furthermore, normal cell turnover and proliferation during fetal and adult growth, is not sufficient for promotion, but tissue damage followed by regenerative proliferation seems to be required for tumor development. We conclude that tumor promoters, chronic inflammation, wounding, and obesity do not contribute significantly to tumor mutational burden, and that the rate-limiting determinant of tumor growth is exposure to a tumor promoter rather than the nature or number of genomic point mutations. These data are highly relevant to the recent demonstration of persistent oncogenic mutations in histologically normal human tissues during ageing.

cancer biology↗

Regulation of KRAS4A/B splicing in cancer stem cells by the RBM39 splicing complex.

The KRAS oncogene is expressed as major KRAS4B and minor KRAS4A splice isoforms, the distinct functions of which in cancer are unknown. We demonstrate here that KRAS4A is enriched in cancer stem-like cells, and is activated by hypoxia, whereas KRAS4B is more widely expressed and responds to ER stress. Mice completely lacking either isoform are viable but resistant to lung cancer development, as are Kras4A/B double heterozygous mice expressing both isoforms, but in which splice regulation has been uncoupled. Splicing of KRAS4A, but not KRAS4B, in human tumor cells can be inhibited by treatment with the splice inhibitor indisulam, or by CRISPR/Cas inhibition of the RBM39 splicing complex. Our data suggest that control of KRAS4A/B splicing is a targetable vulnerability in KRAS mutant tumors.

cancer biology↗

Kinome rewiring reveals AURKA is a molecular barrier to the efficacy of PI3K/mTOR-pathway inhibitors in breast cancer

Dysregulation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling network is a prominent feature of breast cancers. However, clinical responses to drugs targeting this pathway have been modest. We hypothesized that dynamic changes in signaling, including adaptation and feedback, limit drug efficacy. Using a quantitative chemoproteomics approach we mapped dynamic changes in the kinome in response to various agents and identified signaling changes that correlate with drug sensitivity. Measurement of dynamics across a panel of breast cancer cell lines identified that maintenance of CDK4 and AURKA activity was associated with drug resistance. We tested whether incomplete inhibition of CDK4 or AURKA was a source of therapy failure and found that inhibition of either was sufficient to sensitize most breast cancer cells to PI3K, AKT, and mTOR inhibitors. In particular, drug combinations including the AURKA inhibitor MLN8237 were highly synergistic and induced apoptosis through enhanced suppression of mTOR signaling to S6 and 4E-BP1 leading to tumor regression in vivo. This signaling map identifies survival factors whose presence limits the efficacy of target therapy and indicates that Aurora kinase co-inhibition could unlock the full potential of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway inhibitors in breast cancer.

cancer biology↗