Should I stay or should I go? Modelling the decision-making process behind ungulate partial migration

Abstract

Despite the ecological importance of ungulate migrations, we lack a complete understanding of why some ungulates migrate and others do not. Though progress has been made towards understanding differences across species and between populations, migratory behavior varies even within populations: in many populations, some individuals remain behind as residents (partial migration). Theoretical population-level work has suggested that these different migratory tactics can coexist, but such approaches stop short of providing insights into how individuals make the decision to stay or go each year. Using long-term data from three ungulate populations, we find that individuals probabilities of migrating are highly variable across years, which points to a non-trivial context-dependent decision-making process, whose underlying mechanisms must be probed via individual-level modeling. Drawing on existing knowledge, we propose a decision-making model of ungulate migration onset wherein individuals probabilistically decide to start migrating based on the local intensity of environmental and/or social cues. Residents arise as a robust collective organization phenomenon in our model. At sufficiently large population sizes, the number of residents is invariant with total population size, consistent with empirical patterns. Instead, resident numbers are influenced by the severity of the bad season, by relevant character differences among individuals, and by how individuals contribute and respond to environmental and/or social cues; for instance, when social cues contribute to decision-making in addition to environmental ones, fewer residents result, and migration is more likely to be complete. Overall, our model provides a potential mechanistic explanation for how residents might emerge within migratory ungulate populations.