Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tarnita, C. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Tarnita, C. E..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Should I stay or should I go? Modelling the decision-making process behind ungulate partial migration

Despite the ecological importance of ungulate migrations, we lack a complete understanding of why some ungulates migrate and others do not. Though progress has been made towards understanding differences across species and between populations, migratory behavior varies even within populations: in many populations, some individuals remain behind as residents (partial migration). Theoretical population-level work has suggested that these different migratory tactics can coexist, but such approaches stop short of providing insights into how individuals make the decision to stay or go each year. Using long-term data from three ungulate populations, we find that individuals probabilities of migrating are highly variable across years, which points to a non-trivial context-dependent decision-making process, whose underlying mechanisms must be probed via individual-level modeling. Drawing on existing knowledge, we propose a decision-making model of ungulate migration onset wherein individuals probabilistically decide to start migrating based on the local intensity of environmental and/or social cues. Residents arise as a robust collective organization phenomenon in our model. At sufficiently large population sizes, the number of residents is invariant with total population size, consistent with empirical patterns. Instead, resident numbers are influenced by the severity of the bad season, by relevant character differences among individuals, and by how individuals contribute and respond to environmental and/or social cues; for instance, when social cues contribute to decision-making in addition to environmental ones, fewer residents result, and migration is more likely to be complete. Overall, our model provides a potential mechanistic explanation for how residents might emerge within migratory ungulate populations.

ecology↗

Zooplankton feeding behavioral signatures in the morphology of macroscale prey spatial distribution

The problem of pattern and scale remains a central problem in ecology, bridging fundamental and applied questions. Marine microbial communities are a case in point. For instance, to understand the role of zooplankton in oceanic biogeochemistry, their response to changes in environmental conditions, and the implications for ecosystem services (e.g., fisheries), it is critical to understand zooplankton trophic interactions and how they change in a rapidly changing climate. This understanding, however, remains elusive because, unlike for phytoplankton, for which remote sensing of macroscale patterns can provide insight into their microscale dynamics and community composition, obtaining this information for zooplankton largely rests on quantifying the difficult-to-monitor microscale interactions among millions of individuals with different behaviors, and between individuals and their environment. Here, we investigate whether it is possible to obtain indirect information on zooplankton from the macroscale spatial distribution of their prey. To tackle this "problem of scale", we develop a rigorous coarse-graining methodology that connects individual-level properties with macroscale spatial patterns. We demonstrate that the shape of the prey spatial distribution can indeed encode information about zooplankton feeding behavior and community dynamics. Specifically, we predict a change in dominant feeding behavior--from non-motile to motile feeding--as one moves from areas of high to areas of low prey density. These results thus suggest a novel application for remote sensing approaches: the potential tracking of consumer behavioral signatures in the large-scale patterns of the resource. Importantly, the scaling-up methodology that we developed to check whether those signatures exist is general, and can be used to link scales rigorously and systematically in any system in which the complexity of individual dynamics makes connecting scales intractable.

ecology↗

Emergent behavioral organization in heterogeneous groups of a social insect

The composition of social groups has profound effects on their function, from collective decision-making to foraging efficiency. But few social systems afford sufficient control over group composition to precisely quantify its effects on individual and collective behavior. Here we combine experimental and theoretical approaches to study the effect of group composition on individual behavior and division of labor (DOL) in a social insect. Experimentally, we use automated behavioral tracking to monitor 120 colonies of the clonal raider ant, Ooceraea biroi, with controlled variation in three key correlates of social insect behavior: genotype, age, and morphology. We find that each of these sources of heterogeneity generates a distinct pattern of behavioral organization, including the amplification or dampening of inherent behavioral differences in colonies with mixed types. Theoretically, we use a well-studied model of DOL to explore potential mechanisms underlying the experimental findings. We find that the simplest implementation of this model, which assumes that heterogeneous individuals differ only in response thresholds, could only partially recapitulate the empirically observed patterns of behavior. However, the full spectrum of observed phenomena was recapitulated by extending the model to incorporate two factors that are biologically meaningful but theoretically rarely considered: variation among workers in task performance efficiency and among larvae in task demand. Our results thus show that different sources of heterogeneity within social groups can generate different, sometimes non-intuitive, behavioral effects, but that relatively simple models can capture these dynamics and thereby begin to elucidate the basic organizational principles of DOL in social insects. Significance StatementWhen individuals interact in an aggregate, many factors that are not known a priori affect group dynamics. A social group will therefore show emergent properties that cannot easily be predicted from how its members behave in isolation. This problem is exacerbated in mixed groups, where different individuals have different behavioral tendencies. Here we describe different facets of collective behavioral organization in mixed groups of the clonal raider ant, and show that a simple theoretical model can capture even non-intuitive aspects of the behavioral data. These results begin to reveal the principles underlying emergent behavioral organization in social insects. Importantly, our insights might apply to complex biological systems more generally and be used to help engineer collective behavior in artificial systems.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Eco-evolutionary significance of ‘loners’

Loners, individuals out-of-sync with a coordinated majority, occur frequently in nature. Are loners incidental byproducts of large-scale synchronization attempts or are they part of a mosaic of life-history strategies? Here, we provide the first empirical evidence of naturally occurring heritable variation in loner behavior, using the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Moreover, we show that Dictyostelium loners--cells that do not join the multicellular life-stage-- result from a dynamic population-partitioning process. Underlying this partitioning, we find evidence that each cell makes a stochastic, signal-based decision resulting in an imperfectly synchronized multicellular development affected by both abiotic (environmental porosity) and biotic (strain-specific signaling) factors. Finally, we predict that when strains differing in their partitioning behavior co-occur, cross-signaling impacts slime-mold diversity across spatio-temporal scales. Loners are therefore critical to understanding collective and social behaviors, multicellular development, and ecological dynamics in D. discoideum. More broadly, across taxa, imperfect synchronization might be adaptive by enabling diversification of life-history strategies.

ecology↗