Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.24.720589

NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION LIMITS MUSCLE WEAKNESS, ATROPHY, MODULATES SATELLITE CELL FUNCTION AND REDUCES INFLAMMATION IN CANCER CACHEXIA

Abstract

BackgroundCancer cachexia (CC) is characterized by skeletal muscle atrophy and reduced strength, partly linked to dysfunction of muscle stem cells (MuSCs) and alterations in their niche. Although exercise may mitigate muscle loss, its effects in CC remain debated and its feasibility is often limited in advanced patients. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) offers a promising alternative, by promoting MuSC proliferation and fusion, increasing muscle size and macrophage content in healthy muscle. This study investigated whether NMES, initiated at tumor onset, could improve MuSC regulation and its niche while limiting muscle atrophy and weakness in a tumor-bearing mouse model. MethodsTen-week-old male BALB/c mice were subcutaneously injected with C26 tumor cells or PBS. Tumor-bearing mice were divided into NMES-treated (C26 NMES) and non-stimulated controls (C26). NMES consisted of six sessions (two series of three consecutive daily sessions separated by one rest day), starting seven days post-inoculation when tumors became visible. Each session was delivered at a submaximal intensity corresponding to 15% of maximal strength. Muscle mass, myofiber size, strength and cellular composition were assessed. ResultsMuscle mass was decreased by 13% in C26 mice as compared to PBS controls, while C26 NMES mice showed a [~]7% improvement over C26 mice. Mean myofiber size decreased similarly in both tumor-bearing groups as compared to PBS controls (-12-14%). However, NMES reduced the proportion of small myofibers (400-600 {micro}m{superscript 2}) as compared to C26 mice. Maximal torque loss was less severe in C26 NMES mice (-28%) than in C26 mice (-34%). As compared with PBS mice, C26 mice exhibited increased MuSC proliferation (+97%) but reduced differentiation (-61%), as indicated by fewer myogenin-positive cells. NMES normalized MuSC proliferation, restored myogenin-positive cell number, and enhanced MuSC fusion, reflected by an increased number of PCM1-positive myonuclei (+8-11%). NMES also modulated inflammation, reducing neutrophils (-42%) and increasing macrophages (+35%), through the proliferation of CD169-positive resident macrophages (+106%). In vitro, macrophages exposed to C26 muscle extracts showed elevated pro-inflammatory markers (COX2 and TNF-; +21% and +16%) as compared to PBS controls. This effect was abolished with extracts from C26 NMES muscles. Additionally, C26 extracts reduced the expression of anti-inflammatory markers by macrophages (CD206 and IL-10; -23%), whereas NMES restored their levels to those of controls. ConclusionNMES-induced mild contractile activity is an effective stimulus for preserving muscle strength and mass, improving MuSC regulation, and modulating muscle inflammation in a mouse model of CC.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zavoriti, A., Fessard, A., Boyer, N., Moulin, E., Koenig, C., Del Carmine, P., Juban, G., Chazaud, B., Gondin, J.. 2026-04-28. NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION LIMITS MUSCLE WEAKNESS, ATROPHY, MODULATES SATELLITE CELL FUNCTION AND REDUCES INFLAMMATION IN CANCER CACHEXIA. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.24.720589

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A dynamic phosphoproteome reveals stage-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Leishmania

Leishmania parasites undergo extensive morphological and metabolic remodelling during their transition from motile insect promastigotes to non-motile intracellular amastigotes, yet how dynamic protein kinase signalling drives this process remains poorly understood. Here, we present a high-resolution temporal phosphoproteome of L. mexicana promastigote to axenic amastigote differentiation, profiling 16,495 phosphosites on 3,101 proteins across seven developmental time points and identifying 5,795 dynamically regulated sites. This temporal map reveals stage-specific signalling programs, including regulated sites in MPK2 and non-regulated sites in MRK1, protein kinases known to be essential for amastigote differentiation. Using analogue-sensitive (AS) chemical genetics, we show that acute inhibition of either kinase in axenic amastigotes disrupts the spatial coordination of cleavage furrow ingression with nuclear and kinetoplast segregation, revealing essential cytokinesis roles obscured in constitutive gene deletions. Despite generating similar cytokinesis phenotypes, genetic over-expression and cellular localisation analyses demonstrate that MPK2 and MRK1 act through spatially segregated signalling pathways. Time-resolved phosphoproteomics upon MPK2 inhibition places its activity upstream of cytoskeletal remodelling networks. Importantly, we show that the stage-specific requirement for MPK2 is defined by the parasite's morphology: while motile promastigotes tolerate MPK2 inhibition, genetic ablation of flagellar motility sensitises them to loss of MPK2 activity. Thus, flagellar motility acts as a mechanical buffer during promastigote division, explaining why non-motile amastigotes are vulnerable to MPK2 inhibition. Together, our findings provide a systems level framework for Leishmania signalling and demonstrate that cellular architecture and biomechanics dictate protein kinase dependency across developmental stages of the parasite.

cell biology↗

Single-cell Transcriptome-Proteome-PTMome(x8)-Metabolome (scTPPM) co-profiling decodes multimodal regulation during mouse oocyte meiosis

Single-cell multi-omics technology is crucial for comprehensive characterization of cellular molecular features. Despite recent advances in single-cell multi-omics approaches, co-profiling of nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) within the same cell individuals remains major challenges. Here, we developed a single-cell transcriptome, proteome, PTMome, and metabolome (scTPPM) profiling approach, enabling simultaneous analysis of transcriptomes, proteomes, eight types of PTMs (e.g., phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, O_GlcNAc, acetylation, crotonylation, lactylation, and succinylation), and metabolomes in individual cells. We demonstrated the scTPPM's performance in tumor cell lines and oocyte samples, reaching total identification and quantification of 27,668 genes, 4,847 proteins, 1,508 PTM sites, and 680 metabolites in single mouse oocytes. We profiled previously-uncharacterized dynamic crosstalk among the entire metabolic pathways from metabolic enzyme expression and regulation to metabolite-mediated post-translational modifications during oocyte maturation. In summary, scTPPM provided an effective workflow for multi-omics co-profiling in single cells, enabling multi-layered insights into complex regulatory network.

cell biology↗

Sequence context and partner availability specify divergent cell fates from a single transcription factor

Transcription factors drive the gene regulatory networks that control developmental transitions, yet which of their many targets a cell uses remains unresolved. Expressing Cebp, Cebp{beta} or Cebp{delta} identically, alone or with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc, gave four outcomes: adipocyte from fibroblasts and neural stem cells, trophectoderm from embryonic stem cells, and myeloid from B cells. Raising Cebp levels changed how many sites it reached, not which sequence it read: clustered motifs maintained somatic enhancers, while spillover onto low-copy sites created de novo enhancers carrying composites of Cebp and cell-type-restricted partners. In fibroblasts, Cebp also redistributed Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 from early targets, blocking iPSC formation. Supplying the predicted partners rewrote the output: Spi1 redirected Cebp into parallel adipogenic and myeloid programs, via a transient PpargCD45 state using separate enhancers for each; TFAP2C abolished adipogenic conversion. Motif density and partner composites therefore assemble a factor's instructive output in the receiving cell.

cell biology↗