A standard area diagram for potato common scab: comparable performance of image- and object-based validation

Abstract

Potato common scab (Streptomyces sp.) is an economically important disease that reduces the quality and market value of tubers. A key aspect in developing management strategies involves accurately quantifying the disease. Due to the three-dimensional nature of the tuber and the heterogeneous distribution of lesions across its surface, visual estimates of severity can be challenging. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to develop and validate a standard area diagram (SAD) for estimating common scab severity on potato tubers and to compare validation outcomes obtained using real tubers and digital images. A SAD comprising six severity levels (from 1.3 to 66.8%) was developed based on image analysis of naturally infected tubers. Validation was conducted using two complementary approaches in which inexperienced raters evaluated either real potato tubers or digital images of the same tubers under unaided and aided conditions. Accuracy, bias components, and inter-rater reliability were quantified using absolute error metrics, Lins concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficients, and overall concordance correlation coefficients. Use of the SAD significantly improved accuracy, reduced systematic bias, and increased inter-rater reliability across both validation approaches. No significant differences were detected between assessments conducted on real tubers and images, although image-based evaluations showed a slight, non-significant tendency toward reduced scale and location bias under aided conditions. These results demonstrate that a dimension-aware SAD integrating information across the full tuber surface enhances the reliability and reproducibility of visual severity assessments and supports the use of image-based evaluations for training, large-scale surveys, and remote or collaborative applications involving three-dimensional plant organs.