Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.02.24.707829

Decoding the Allosteric Paradox: A Dual Framework Integrating AI Cofolding Models with Landscape-Guided Interpretable AI Framework of Ligand-Protein Binding

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed prediction of protein structure and biomolecular interactions, yet modeling of allosteric regulation remains a persistent and unresolved challenge. We develop a dual explainable AI framework that systematically interrogates AI Co-Folding models AlphaFold3, Protenix, Boltz-2, Chai-1, and DynamicBind on rigorously stratified datasets of orthosteric and allosteric ligand-protein complexes. While all AI models excel in accurate modeling of orthosteric ligand binding, a universal and architecture-independent collapse emerges in prediction of allosteric complexes. The biophysical logic for this dichotomy is unveiled through physics-based lens of the energy landscape theory and local frustration analysis. Orthosteric binding creates dominant energetic funnels via ligand-induced minimal frustration quenching, while allosteric sites preserve neutral frustration landscapes in both apo and holo protein states. The findings show that conformational heterogeneity and evolutionary plasticity encoded in allosteric binding landscapes may conceal the recurrent recognition patterns AI models are trained to detect. By linking prediction outcomes to frustration landscapes, this study recasts AI shortcomings in allosteric ligand binding as diagnostic indicators of fundamental biophysical constraints, establishing a physics-informed framework that turns the allosteric blind spot into mechanistic insight for next-generation landscape-aware predictive tools.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Parikh, V., Foley, B., Gatlin, W., Ludwick, M., Turano, L., Verkhivker, G.. 2026-02-26. Decoding the Allosteric Paradox: A Dual Framework Integrating AI Cofolding Models with Landscape-Guided Interpretable AI Framework of Ligand-Protein Binding. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.24.707829

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Design of colipids with controlled lateral distance of head group moieties for targeting strategies in the field of lipid-based nanoparticles

Lipid nanoparticles and liposomes are nanoparticle drug formulations which are firmly established in clinics. In order to expand their application and improve efficacy, surface modifications can be a key strategy, especially for cell specific targeting. Targeting can be achieved by integrating ligand functionalized lipids or lipidoids on the nanoparticle surface. In this case, not solely the targeting ligand itself, but also the structure of the whole targeting lipid/lipidoid can affect the interaction of the targeting ligand with the binding motive on cells. Especially, distal spacer structures between lipid anchor and ligand unit, often composed of polyethylene glycol chains, provide a certain distance of the ligand from the nanoparticle surface. A concept which is currently neglected is the control of the lateral distance between ligand structures on the nanoparticle. Herein we investigated the possibility to design lipidoids with a lateral spacer composed of polyethylene glycol units. We synthesized and characterized different lipidoids which provide a primary amine in the head group for possible ligand coupling. In our model lipidoids the head groups were functionalized with a paramagnetic probe to apply electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) methods for the characterization of the lipidoid interaction with model nanoparticles, in our case liposomes. Continuous wave EPR was used to study the efficiency of the novel lipidoids to integrate into lipid bilayers of model liposomes, which was shown to depend on lipidoid structure and liposome composition. Furthermore, using double electron-electron resonance (DEER), we observed lipidoid conformational changes occurring upon integration into liposomes.

biophysics↗

Beyond Sequence and Structure: Pretraining PLMs on Continuous Biophysical Fields

We introduce the Biophysical Transformer, a protein language model that adds continuous biophysical fields as a third pretraining signal beside sequence and structure. A Poisson-Boltzmann solver computes the electrostatic potential around each three-residue token, and the model learns to predict it from sequence alone. A rotationally invariant spherical-harmonic descriptor serves as the loss target, eliminating the need for frame alignment during training and for coordinates at inference. Against a matched, one-flag control on the FLIP Meltome thermostability benchmark, the field objective raises Spearman correlation on every trained head of both human splits.The gain on human survives residualizing dipeptide composition under two architecturally different readouts and survives removing the test proteins that overlap the pretraining corpus. No effect survives on the organism-mixed split. At 1.1M parameters, both the Biophysical Transformer and its sequence-only control exceed FLIP's one-hot CNN and untrained-ESM baselines on every split. All results rest on a single pretraining run per arm,and the current design does not separate field content from generic regularization.

biophysics↗

An auditable harness for biomolecular dynamics simulations by AI agents

AI agents now generate biological hypotheses faster than they can be tested. Hypotheses stated at the atomic level can be examined with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. For new questions without a reference, trust in an agent-run simulation rests on a tool-written process record, not the agent's account. Existing MD agents leave this record to the language model. Here we present MDClaw, a harness whose validating tools and directed acyclic graph (DAG) check stages before execution and record every simulation stage. On MDDataBench, which grades outputs against deposited simulations, four open-weight models with MDClaw passed all three runs on 81-100% of 31 test systems. The DAG complements this outcome check. An ablation without the DAG revealed 11 successful runs that had skipped minimization or equilibration, or simulated a different structure. MDClaw carried questions from human and AI scientists through simulation to trajectories traceable to their inputs and settings.

biophysics↗