Ludwick, M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Decoding the Allosteric Paradox: A Dual Framework Integrating AI Cofolding Models with Landscape-Guided Interpretable AI Framework of Ligand-Protein Binding

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed prediction of protein structure and biomolecular interactions, yet modeling of allosteric regulation remains a persistent and unresolved challenge. We develop a dual explainable AI framework that systematically interrogates AI Co-Folding models AlphaFold3, Protenix, Boltz-2, Chai-1, and DynamicBind on rigorously stratified datasets of orthosteric and allosteric ligand-protein complexes. While all AI models excel in accurate modeling of orthosteric ligand binding, a universal and architecture-independent collapse emerges in prediction of allosteric complexes. The biophysical logic for this dichotomy is unveiled through physics-based lens of the energy landscape theory and local frustration analysis. Orthosteric binding creates dominant energetic funnels via ligand-induced minimal frustration quenching, while allosteric sites preserve neutral frustration landscapes in both apo and holo protein states. The findings show that conformational heterogeneity and evolutionary plasticity encoded in allosteric binding landscapes may conceal the recurrent recognition patterns AI models are trained to detect. By linking prediction outcomes to frustration landscapes, this study recasts AI shortcomings in allosteric ligand binding as diagnostic indicators of fundamental biophysical constraints, establishing a physics-informed framework that turns the allosteric blind spot into mechanistic insight for next-generation landscape-aware predictive tools.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2026

Protein Language Models and Structure-Based Machine Learning for Prediction of Allosteric Binding Sites in Protein Kinases: An Explainable AI Framework Grounded in Energy Landscape-Encoded Frustration

Reliable identification of allosteric binding sites remains a major bottleneck in structure-based drug discovery, particularly in protein kinase families where such sites are often structurally cryptic, evolutionarily non-conserved, and sparsely populated. In this work, we present a systematic analysis of binding site prediction across a rigorously curated dataset of human kinase-ligand complexes, encompassing 453 kinases and spanning five inhibitor classes: Type I, Type I.5, and Type II (orthosteric ATP-competitive) and Type III/IV (non-ATP allosteric) modulators. We employed the pretrained protein language model (PLM) ESM2-650M model that was fine-tuned for prediction of protein-ligand binding sites by replacing the original masked language modeling head with a token-level classification head that acts as a projection layer that maps the high-dimensional latent representation of each residue to a scalar probability score for a given protein residue to be part of the binding site. We employed this fine-tuned sequence-based PLM and structure-based detection approach P2Rank for identification of orthosteric and allosteric binding sites in protein kinases. Our analysis reveals a stark performance divergence: while both methods achieve high precision-recall (AUPR = 0.64-0.76) on orthosteric sites, PLM performance collapses on allosteric sites (AUPR = 0.06), despite retaining moderate ranking ability (AUROC = 0.70). This deficit persists even after strict control for sequence similarity, structural redundancy, and extreme class imbalance (allosteric residues constitute <3% of the kinase domain). To mechanistically interpret this discrepancy, we integrate large-scale local frustration analysis, a physics-based framework derived from energy landscape theory that quantifies the energetic stability of residue-residue interactions under mutational and conformational perturbations. We find that, although the global frustration landscape is conserved across kinase states dominated by neutral frustration (55-75% of residues), local binding sites exhibit fundamentally distinct mutational constraints. Orthosteric pockets are enriched in minimally frustrated residues, whereas allosteric sites are characterized by neutral mutational frustration, indicating evolutionary permissiveness and sequence degeneracy. This study reframes the performance of AI approaches in predicting protein binding sites as a reflection of functional design that can be rationalized through lens of the landscape-encoded protein frustration as an explainable AI framework.

biophysics↗