Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/827956

Genomic data enables genetic evaluation using data recorded on LMIC smallholder dairy farms

Abstract

BackgroundGenetic evaluation is a central component of a breeding program. In advanced economies, most genetic evaluations depend on large quantities of data that are recorded on commercial farms. Large herd sizes and widespread use of artificial insemination create strong genetic connectedness that enables the genetic and environmental effects of an individual animals phenotype to be accurately separated. In contrast to this, herds are neither large nor have strong genetic connectedness in smallholder dairy production systems of many low to middle-income countries (LMIC). This limits genetic evaluation, and furthermore, the pedigree information needed for traditional genetic evaluation is typically unavailable. Genomic information keeps track of shared haplotypes rather than shared relatives. This information could capture and strengthen genetic connectedness between herds and through this may enable genetic evaluations for LMIC smallholder dairy farms. The objective of this study was to use simulation to quantify the power of genomic information to enable genetic evaluation under such conditions.\n\nResultsThe results from this study show: (i) the genetic evaluation of phenotyped cows using genomic information had higher accuracy compared to pedigree information across all breeding designs; (ii) the genetic evaluation of phenotyped cows with genomic information and modelling herd as a random effect had higher or equal accuracy compared to modelling herd as a fixed effect; (iii) the genetic evaluation of phenotyped cows from breeding designs with strong genetic connectedness had higher accuracy compared to breeding designs with weaker genetic connectedness; (iv) genomic prediction of young bulls was possible using marker estimates from the genetic evaluations of their phenotyped dams. For example, the accuracy of genomic prediction of young bulls from an average herd size of 1 (=1.58) was 0.40 under a breeding design with 1,000 sires mated per generation and a training set of 8,000 phenotyped and genotyped cows.\n\nConclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of genomic information to be an enabling technology in LMIC smallholder dairy production systems by facilitating genetic evaluations with in-situ records collected from farms with herd sizes of four cows or less. Across a range of breeding designs, genomic data enabled accurate genetic evaluation of phenotyped cows and genomic prediction of young bulls using data sets that contained small herds with weak genetic connections. The use of smallholder dairy data in genetic evaluations would enable the establishment of breeding programs to improve in-situ germplasm and, if required, would enable the importation of the most suitable external germplasm. This could be individually tailored for each target environment. Together this would increase the productivity, profitability and sustainability of LMIC smallholder dairy production systems. However, data collection, including genomic data, is expensive and business models will need to be carefully constructed so that the costs are sustainably offset.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Powell, O. M., Mrode, R., Gaynor, R. C., Johnsson, M., Gorjanc, G. M., Hickey, J. M.. 2019-11-02. Genomic data enables genetic evaluation using data recorded on LMIC smallholder dairy farms. https://doi.org/10.1101/827956

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

SARDINE unlocks EWAS summary statistics for large-scale epigenetic biomarker analysis

Epigenetic clocks are increasingly used to study biological aging, yet their interpretation and utility remain uncertain. Meanwhile, the growing wealth of epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) summary statistics remains largely untapped for evaluating these biomarkers. Here, we introduce SARDINE, a statistical framework that estimates epigenetic clock-phenotype associations using EWAS summary statistics, clock weights, and reference methylation covariance, without individual-level data. SARDINE accurately reproduced individual-level association estimates across 38 epigenetic biomarkers and four phenotypes in 15,677 individuals. Applying SARDINE to diverse EWAS datasets revealed substantial heterogeneity in biomarker associations with aging, diseases, and lifestyle factors. By transforming CpG-level EWAS results into interpretable biomarker-level associations, SARDINE unlocks a largely underutilized data resource and establishes a scalable paradigm for systematic biomarker evaluation and discovery in aging research.

genetics↗

Deep transcriptomic analysis of molecular mediators of complex traits in heterogeneous stock (HS) rats

Rats are a powerful model organism for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of physiological and behavioral traits. Heterogeneous Stock (HS) rats, which were created by intercrossing 8 inbred rat strains, are heavily used for this purpose because of their genetic diversity and accumulated recombinations due to over 100 generations of outbreeding, which improves mapping precision. However, functional genomics resources for post-GWAS interpretation of genomic findings have been limited. We processed 3,160 RNA-seq samples, 1,932 of which were previously unpublished, from 13 tissues as part of RatGTEx. We used Pantry to quantify six modalities of transcriptome regulation (expression, isoform ratio, intron excision ratio, alternative transcription start site (TSS), alternative poly(A), and RNA stability) in each sample, which allowed us to identify 144,876 independent quantitative trait loci (QTL) for 22,599 genes. We performed a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) with 19,796 unique genes across tissues and transcriptional modalities and 308 traits collected from 14 studies using FUSION, which identified 7,473 significant gene-trait associations. This work presents a significant expansion of the RatGTEx resource in terms of samples, modes of transcriptome regulation, and genetic analyses. Our findings provide molecular evidence for the involvement of specific genes in mediating GWAS signals through a range of transcriptome regulatory mechanisms. These gene-to-phenotype relationships can be easily applied to genetic analyses in humans and other species. Further experiments can use this evidence to confirm these molecular mediators and target them for the treatment of behavioral and physiological traits and disorders. To facilitate use of these results, we have updated results on RatGTEx.org and provided a new interactive TWAS web portal (twas.ratgtex.org).

genetics↗

Genomic and Epigenomic Relationships Capture Different Patterns of Genotype-by-Environment Interaction in Grapevine Clones

Genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) challenges selection in clonally propagated perennial crops by reducing the consistency of clone performance across years. In perennial crops, both genetic and epigenetic variation are likely to contribute to complex trait variation among clones. However, the extent to which each molecular source contribute to GEI remains poorly understood. Here, we used UMR-seq, an assay that recovers SNPs and unmethylated-region (UMR; DNA methylation) profiles from a single library, to generate paired genomic and epigenomic profiles for 206 Riesling (Vitis vinifera L.) clones phenotyped for yield and juice quality traits across nine growing seasons. We then partitioned the contribution of each omic layer to clonal variation and GEI, and examined the genomic distribution of their effects. In models without explicit GEI, environmental and residual effects were the largest source of phenotypic variance and the clonal main effect was modest. Genomic relationships accounted for most of the clonal variance in four of five traits, and adding an epigenomic relationship matrix (ERM) to the genomic relationship matrix (GRM) had little effect. In contrast, when GEI effects were modelled using factor-analytic covariance structures, the epigenomic layer captured a substantial proportion of GEI variance and exceeded the genomic contribution in four of five traits. The two omic layers differed not only in the amount of GEI captured, but also in the pattern of clone re-ranking across years. When back-solved effects were aggregated into genomic windows, the largest genomic and epigenomic effects tended to fall in different regions, with overlap no greater than expected by chance. Together, these results show that genomic and epigenomic relationships capture complementary components of year-to-year variation in clone performance, with the epigenomic contribution expressed primarily through GEI. These findings provide a basis for investigating the molecular drivers of GEI and for testing whether genomic and epigenomic information can inform selection for stable clonal performance across variable environments.

genetics↗