Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Hickey, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Hickey, J. M..

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Accurate determination of breed origin of alleles in a simulated smallholder crossbred dairy cattle population

BackgroundAccurate assignment of breed origin of alleles at a heterozygote locus may help to introduce a resilient or adaptive haplotype in crossbreeding. In this study, we developed and tested a method to assign breed of origin for individual alleles in crossbred dairy cattle. After generations of mating within and between local breeds as well as the importation of exotic bulls, five rounds of selected crossbred cows were simulated to mimic a dairy breeding programme in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In each round of selection, the alleles of those crossbred animals were phased and assigned to their breed of origin (being either local or exotic). ResultsAcross all core lengths and modes of phasing (with offset or no), the average percentage of alleles correctly assigned a breed origin was 95.76%, with only 1.39% incorrectly assigned and 2.85% missing or unassigned. On consensus, the average percentage of alleles correctly assigned a breed origin was 93.21%, with only 0.46% incorrectly assigned and 6.33% missing or unassigned. This high proportion of alleles correctly assigned a breed origin resulted in a high core-based mean accuracy of 0.99 and a very high consensus-based mean accuracy of 1.00. The algorithms assignment yield and accuracy were affected by the choice of threshold levels for the best match of assignments. The threshold level had the opposite effect on assignment yield and assignment accuracy. A less stringent threshold generated higher assignment yields and lower assignment accuracy. ConclusionsWe developed an algorithm that accurately assigns a breed origin to alleles of crossbred animals designed to represent breeding programmes in the LMICs. The developed algorithm is straightforward in its application and does not require prior knowledge of pedigree, which makes it more relevant and applicable in LMICs breeding programmes.

genetics↗

Effects of aluminum-salt, CpG and emulsion adjuvants on the stability and immunogenicity of a virus-like particle displaying the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD)

Second-generation COVID-19 vaccines with improved immunogenicity (e.g., breadth, duration) and availability (e.g., lower costs, refrigerator stable) are needed to enhance global coverage. In this work, we formulated a clinical-stage SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine candidate (IVX-411) with widely available adjuvants. Specifically, we assessed the in vitro storage stability and in vivo mouse immunogenicity of IVX-411 formulated with aluminum-salt adjuvants (Alhydrogel, AH and Adjuphos, AP), without or with the TLR-9 agonist CpG-1018 (CpG), and compared these profiles to IVX-411 adjuvanted with an oil-in-water nano-emulsion (AddaVax, AV). Although IVX-411 bound both AH and AP, lower binding strength of antigen to AP was observed by Langmuir binding isotherms. Interestingly, AH- and AP-adsorbed IVX-411 had similar storage stability profiles as measured by antigen binding assays (competitive ELISAs), but the latter displayed higher pseudovirus neutralizing titers (pNT) in mice, at levels comparable to titers elicited by AV-adjuvanted IVX-411. CpG addition to alum (AP or AH) resulted in a marginal trend of improved pNTs in stressed samples only, yet did not impact the storage stability profiles of IVX-411. In contrast, previous work with AH-formulations of a monomeric RBD antigen showed greatly improved immunogenicity and decreased stability upon CpG addition to alum. At elevated temperatures (25, 37{degrees}C), IVX-411 formulated with AH or AP displayed decreased in vitro stability compared to AV-formulated IVX-411and this rank-ordering correlated with in vivo performance (mouse pNT values). This case study highlights the importance of optimizing antigen-adjuvant interactions to develop low cost, aluminum-salt adjuvanted recombinant subunit vaccine candidates.

immunology↗

Using large-scale whole-genome sequence data for single-step genomic predictions in maternal and terminal pig lines

BackgroundWhole-genome sequence (WGS) data harbor causative variants that may not be present in the regular SNP chip data. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of using preselected variants from WGS for single-step genomic predictions in maternal and terminal pig lines with up to 1.8k sequenced and 104k imputed sequenced animals per line. MethodsTwo maternal and four terminal lines were investigated for eight and seven traits, respectively. The number of sequenced animals ranged from 1,365 to 1,491 in maternal lines and 381 to 1,865 in terminal lines. Imputation occurred within each line, and the number of animals imputed to sequence ranged from 66k to 76k in maternal lines and 29k to 104k in terminal lines. Two preselected SNP sets were generated based on genome-wide association study (GWAS). Top40k included the SNP with the lowest p-value in each of 40k genomic windows; ChipPlusSign included significant variants integrated into the regular porcine SNP chip. Single-step genomic predictions with equal or different SNP variances using those SNP sets were compared to the regular porcine SNP chip. ResultsIn maternal lines, ChipPlusSign, and Top40k showed, on average, 0.62%, and 4.9% increased accuracy compared to the regular porcine SNP chip. The greatest changes were for fertility traits with Top40k, where the initial accuracy based on the SNP chip was low. However, for terminal lines, Top40k resulted in a loss of accuracy of 1% on average. Only ChipPlusSign provided a positive, albeit small, gain (0.85%). Assigning different variances for SNP slightly improved accuracies when using variances obtained from BayesR; however, the increase was inconsistent across the lines and traits. ConclusionsThe benefit of using sequence data depends on the line, size of the genotyped population, and how the WGS variants are preselected. When WGS is available on hundreds of thousands of animals, the advantage of sequence data is present but limited in maternal and terminal pig lines.

genomics↗

Genomic prediction with whole-genome sequence data in intensely selected pig lines

BackgroundEarly simulations indicated that whole-genome sequence data (WGS) could improve genomic prediction accuracy and its persistence across generations and breeds. However, empirical results have been ambiguous so far. Large data sets that capture most of the genome diversity in a population must be assembled so that allele substitution effects are estimated with high accuracy. The objectives of this study were to use a large pig dataset to assess the benefits of using WGS for genomic prediction compared to using commercial marker arrays, to identify scenarios in which WGS provides the largest advantage, and to identify potential pitfalls for its effective implementation. MethodsWe sequenced 6,931 individuals from seven commercial pig lines with different numerical size. Genotypes of 32.8 million variants were imputed for 396,100 individuals (17,224 to 104,661 per line). We used BayesR to perform genomic prediction for eight complex traits. Genomic predictions were performed using either data from a marker array or variants preselected from WGS based on association tests. ResultsThe prediction accuracy with each set of preselected WGS variants was not robust across traits and lines and the improvements in prediction accuracy that we achieved so far with WGS compared to marker arrays were generally small. The most favourable results for WGS were obtained when the largest training sets were available and used to preselect variants with statistically significant associations to the trait for augmenting the established marker array. With this method and training sets of around 80k individuals, average improvements of genomic prediction accuracy of 0.025 were observed in within-line scenarios. ConclusionsOur results showed that WGS has a small potential to improve genomic prediction accuracy compared to marker arrays in intensely selected pig lines in some settings. Thus, although we expect that more robust improvements could be attained with a combination of larger training sets and optimised pipelines, the use of WGS in the current implementations of genomic prediction should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis against the cost of generating WGS at a large scale.

genomics↗

Rare and population-specific functional variation across pig lines

BackgroundIt is expected that functional, mainly missense and loss-of-function (LOF), and regulatory variants are responsible for phenotypic differences among breeds, genetic lines, and varieties of livestock and crop species that have undergone diverse selection histories. However, there is still limited knowledge about the existing missense and LOF variation in livestock commercial populations, in particular regarding population-specific variation and how it can affect applications such as across-breed genomic prediction. MethodsWe re-sequenced the whole genome of 7,848 individuals from nine commercial pig breeding lines (average sequencing coverage: 4.1x) and imputed whole-genome genotypes for 440,610 pedigree-related individuals. The called variants were categorized according to predicted functional annotation (from LOF to intergenic) and prevalence level (number of lines in which the variant segregated; from private to widespread). Variants in each category were examined in terms of distribution along the genome, minor allele frequency, Wrights fixation index (FST), individual load, and association to production traits. ResultsOf the 46 million called variants, 28% were private (called in only one line) and 21% were widespread (called in all nine lines). Genomic regions with low recombination rate were enriched with private variants. Low-prevalence variants (called in one or a few lines only) were enriched for lower allele frequencies, lower FST, and putatively functional and regulatory roles (including loss-of-function and deleterious missense variants). Only a small subset of low-prevalence variants was found at intermediate allele frequencies and had large estimated effects on production traits. Individuals on average carried less private deleterious missense alleles than expected compared to other predicted consequence types. A small subset of low-prevalence variants with intermediate allele frequencies and higher FST were detected as significantly associated to the production traits and explained small fractions of phenotypic variance (up to 3.2%). These associations were tagged by other more widespread variants, including intergenic variants. ConclusionsMost low-prevalence variants are kept at very low allele frequency and only a small subset contributed detectable fractions of phenotypic variance. Not accounting for low-prevalence variants is therefore unlikely to hinder across-breed analyses, in particular for genomic prediction of breeding values using reference populations of a different genetic background.

genomics↗

Performance of genetic imputation across commercial crop species

We show that accurate imputation can be carried out in three commercial plant species (maize, sugar beet and wheat) and that accurate imputation does not require a pedigree, although pedigree information can improve accuracy and speed. Our approach uses a hidden Markov model to build a haplotype library from individuals genotyped at high-density and then uses this library to impute low-density genotyped individuals to high-density. To build the library, we use founders when the pedigree is known, or a sample of progeny when the pedigree is unknown. Without a pedigree, and with 50 individuals genotyped at high-density and 100 low-density markers per chromosome, the median accuracies were 0.97 (maize), 0.96 (sugar beet), and 0.94 (wheat). We obtained similar accuracies with a pedigree. For biparental crosses with 100 markers per chromosome, median accuracies were 0.96 (maize), 0.96 (sugar beet) and 0.94 (wheat). For the imputation scenarios without a pedigree, we compared accuracies with those obtained by running Beagle 5.1. In all but one scenario, our method outperformed Beagle. We believe that plant breeders can effectively apply imputation in many crop species.

genetics↗

Molecular engineering improves antigen quality and enables integrated manufacturing of a trivalent subunit vaccine candidate for rotavirus

BackgroundVaccines comprising recombinant subunit proteins are well-suited to low-cost and high-volume production for global use. The design of manufacturing processes to produce subunit vaccines depends, however, on the inherent biophysical traits presented by an individual antigen of interest. New candidate antigens typically require developing custom processes for each one and may require unique steps to ensure sufficient yields without product-related variants. ResultsWe describe a holistic approach for the molecular design of recombinant protein antigens--considering both their manufacturability and antigenicity--informed by bioinformatic analyses such as RNA-seq, ribosome profiling, and sequence-based prediction tools. We demonstrate this approach by engineering the product sequences of a trivalent non-replicating rotavirus vaccine (NRRV) candidate to improve titers and mitigate product variants caused by N-terminal truncation, hypermannosylation, and aggregation. The three engineered NRRV antigens retained their original antigenicity and immunogenicity, while their improved manufacturability enabled concomitant production and purification of all three serotypes in a single, end-to-end perfusion-based process using the biotechnical yeast Komagataella phaffii. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that molecular engineering of subunit antigens using advanced genomic methods can facilitate their manufacturing in continuous production. Such capabilities have potential to lower the cost and volumetric requirements in manufacturing vaccines based on recombinant protein subunits.

bioengineering↗

AlphaImpute2: Fast and accurate pedigree and population based imputation for hundreds of thousands of individuals in livestock populations

In this paper we present a new imputation algorithm, AlphaImpute2, which performs fast and accurate pedigree and population based imputation for livestock populations of hundreds of thousands of individuals. Genetic imputation is a tool used in genetics to decrease the cost of genotyping a population, by genotyping a small number of individuals at high-density and the remaining individuals at low-density. Shared haplotype segments between the high-density and low-density individuals can then be used to fill in the missing genotypes of the low-density individuals. As the size of genetics datasets have grown, the computational cost of performing imputation has increased, particularly in agricultural breeding programs where there might be hundreds of thousands of genotyped individuals. To address this issue, we present a new imputation algorithm, AlphaImpute2, which performs population imputation by using a particle based approximation to the Li and Stephens which exploits the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform, and performs pedigree imputation using an approximate version of multi-locus iterative peeling. We tested AlphaImpute2 on four simulated datasets designed to mimic the pedigrees found in a real pig breeding program. We compared AlphaImpute2 to AlphaImpute, AlphaPeel, findhap version 4, and Beagle 5.1. We found that AlphaImpute2 had the highest accuracy, with an accuracy of 0.993 for low-density individuals on the pedigree with 107,000 individuals, compared to an accuracy of 0.942 for Beagle 5.1, 0.940 for AlphaImpute, and 0.801 for findhap. AlphaImpute2 was also the fastest software tested, with a runtime of 105 minutes a pedigree of 107,000 individuals and 5,000 markers was 105 minutes, compared to 190 minutes for Beagle 5.1, 395 minutes for findhap, and 7,859 minutes AlphaImpute. We believe that AlphaImpute2 will enable fast and accurate large scale imputation for agricultural populations as they scale to hundreds of thousands or millions of genotyped individuals.

genetics↗

Modelling illustrates that genomic selection provides new opportunities for intercrop breeding

Intercrop breeding programs using genomic selection can produce faster genetic gain than intercrop breeding programs using phenotypic selection. Intercropping is an agricultural practice in which two or more component crops are grown together. It can lead to enhanced soil structure and fertility, improved weed suppression, and better control of pests and diseases. Especially in subsistence agriculture, intercropping has great potential to optimise farming and increase profitability. However, breeding for intercrop varieties is complex as it requires simultaneous improvement of two or more component crops that combine well in the field. We hypothesize that genomic selection can significantly simplify and accelerate the process of breeding crops for intercropping. Therefore, we used stochastic simulation to compare four different intercrop breeding programs implementing genomic selection and an intercrop breeding program entirely based on phenotypic selection. We assumed three different levels of genetic correlation between monocrop grain yield and intercrop grain yield to investigate how the different breeding strategies are impacted by this factor. We found that all four simulated breeding programs using genomic selection produced significantly more intercrop genetic gain than the phenotypic selection program regardless of the genetic correlation with monocrop yield. We suggest a genomic selection strategy which combines monocrop and intercrop trait information to predict general intercropping ability to increase selection accuracy in early stages of a breeding program and to minimize the generation interval.

genetics↗

AlphaSimR: An R-package for Breeding Program Simulations

This paper introduces AlphaSimR, an R package for stochastic simulations of plant and animal breeding programs. AlphaSimR is a highly flexible software package able to simulate a wide range of plant and animal breeding programs for diploid and autopolyploid species. AlphaSimR is ideal for testing the overall strategy and detailed design of breeding programs. AlphaSimR utilizes a scripting approach to building simulations that is particularly well suited for modeling highly complex breeding programs, such as commercial breeding programs. The primary benefit of this scripting approach is that it frees users from preset breeding program designs and allows them to model nearly any breeding program design. This paper lists the main features of AlphaSimR and provides a brief example simulation to show how to use the software.

genetics↗

Genomic selection strategies for clonally propagated crops

For genomic selection in clonal breeding programs to be effective, crossing parents should be selected based on genomic predicted cross performance unless dominance is negligible. Genomic prediction of cross performance enables a balanced exploitation of the additive and dominance value simultaneously. Here, we compared different strategies for the implementation of genomic selection in clonal plant breeding programs. We used stochastic simulations to evaluate six combinations of three breeding programs and two parent selection methods. The three breeding programs included i) a breeding program that introduced genomic selection in the first clonal testing stage, and ii) two variations of a two-part breeding program with one and three crossing cycles per year, respectively. The two parent selection methods were i) selection of parents based on genomic estimated breeding values, and ii) selection of parents based on genomic predicted cross performance. Selection of parents based on genomic predicted cross performance produced faster genetic gain than selection of parents based on genomic estimated breeding values because it substantially reduced inbreeding when the dominance degree increased. The two-part breeding programs with one and three crossing cycles per year using genomic prediction of cross performance always produced the most genetic gain unless dominance was negligible. We conclude that i) in clonal breeding programs with genomic selection, parents should be selected based on genomic predicted cross performance, and ii) a two-part breeding program with parent selection based on genomic predicted cross performance to rapidly drive population improvement has great potential to improve breeding clonally propagated crops.

genetics↗

Spatial modelling improves genetic evaluation in smallholder breeding programs

Breeders and geneticists use statistical models for genetic evaluation of animals to separate genetic and environmental effects on phenotype. A common way to separate these effects is to model a descriptor of an environment, a contemporary group or herd, and account for genetic relationship between animals across the environments. However, separating the genetic and environmental effects in smallholder systems is challenging due to small herd sizes and weak genetic connectedness across herds. Our hypothesis was that accounting for spatial relationships between nearby herds can improve genetic evaluation in smallholder systems. Further, geographically referenced environmental covariates are increasingly available and could be used to model underlying sources of the spatial relationships. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the potential of spatial modelling to improve genetic evaluation in smallholder systems. We focus solely on dairy cattle smallholder systems. We performed simulations and real dairy cattle data analysis to test our hypothesis. We used a range of models to account for environmental variation by estimating herd and spatial effects. We compared these models using pedigree or genomic data. The results show that in smallholder systems (i) standard models are not able to separate genetic and environmental effects, (ii) spatial modelling increases accuracy of genetic evaluation for phenotyped and non-phenotyped animals, (iii) environmental covariates do not substantially improve accuracy of genetic evaluation beyond simple distance-driven spatial relationships between herds, (iv) the benefit of spatial modelling was the largest when the genetic and environmental effects were hard to separate and (v) spatial modelling was beneficial when using either pedigree or genomic data. We have demonstrated the potential of spatial modelling to improve genetic evaluation in smallholder systems. This improvement is driven by establishing environmental connectedness between herds that enhances separation of the genetic and environmental effects. We suggest routine spatial modelling in genetic evaluations, particularly for smallholder systems. Spatial modelling could also have major impact in studies of human and wild populations.

genetics↗

A Two-Part Strategy using Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crop Breeding Programs

Hybrid crop breeding programs using a two-part strategy produced the most genetic gain, but a maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme was required to increase long-term genetic gain. The two-part strategy uses outbred parents to complete multiple generations per year to reduce the generation interval of hybrid crop breeding programs. The maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme manages genetic variance by maintaining uniform contributions and inbreeding coefficients across all crosses. This study performed stochastic simulations to quantify the potential of a two-part strategy in combination with two crossing schemes to increase the rate of genetic gain in hybrid crop breeding programs. The two crossing schemes were: (i) a circular crossing scheme, and (ii) a maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme. The results from this study show that the implementation of genomic selection increased the rate of genetic gain, and that the two-part hybrid crop breeding program generated the highest genetic gain. This study also shows that the maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme increased long-term genetic gain in two-part hybrid crop breeding programs completing multiple selection cycles per year, as a result of maintaining higher levels of genetic variance over time. The flexibility of the two-part strategy offers further opportunities to integrate new technologies to further increase genetic gain in hybrid crop breeding programs, such as the use of outbred training populations. However, the practical implementation of the two-part strategy will require the development of bespoke transition strategies to fundamentally change the data, logistics, and infrastructure that underpin hybrid crop breeding programs. Key messageHybrid crop breeding programs using a two-part strategy produced the most genetic gain by using outbred parents to complete multiple generations per year. However, a maximum avoidance of inbreeding crossing scheme was required to manage genetic variance and increase long-term genetic gain.

genetics↗

AlphaPart - R implementation of the method for partitioning genetic trends

BackgroundIn this paper we present the AlphaPart R package, an open-source software that implements a method for partitioning breeding values and genetic trends to identify sources of genetic gain. Breeding programmes improve populations for a set of traits, which can be measured with a genetic trend calculated from averaged year of birth estimated breeding values of selection candidates. While sources of the overall genetic gain are generally known, their realised contributions are hard to quantify in complex breeding programmes. The aim of this paper is to present the AlphaPart R package and demonstrate it with a simulated pig breeding example. ResultsThe package includes the main partitioning function AlphaPart, that partitions the breeding values and genetic trends by analyst defined paths, and a set of functions for handling data and results. The package is freely available from CRAN repository at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AlphaPart. We demonstrate the use of the package by examining the genetic gain in a pig breeding example, in which the multiplier achieved higher breeding values than the nucleus for traits measured and selected in the multiplier. The partitioning analysis revealed that these higher values depended on the accuracy and intensity of selection in the multiplier and the extent of gene flow from the nucleus. For traits measured only in the nucleus, the multiplier achieved comparable or smaller genetic gain than the nucleus depending on the amount of gene flow. ConclusionsAlphaPart implements a method for partitioning breeding values and genetic trends and provides a useful tool for quantifying the sources of genetic gain in breeding programmes. The use of AlphaPart will help breeders to better understand or improve their breeding programmes.

genomics↗

Genetics of recombination rate variation in the pig

BackgroundIn this paper, we estimated recombination rate variation within the genome and between individuals in the pig using multiocus iterative peeling for 150,000 pigs across nine genotyped pedigrees. We used this to estimate the heritability of recombination and perform a genome-wide association study of recombination in the pig. ResultsOur results confirmed known features of the pig recombination landscape, including differences in chromosome length, and marked sex differences. The recombination landscape was repeatable between lines, but at the same time, the lines also showed differences in average genome-wide recombination rate. The heritability of genome-wide recombination was low but non-zero (on average 0.07 for females and 0.05 for males). We found three genomic regions associated with recombination rate, one of them harbouring the RNF212 gene, previously associated with recombination rate in several other species. ConclusionOur results from the pig agree with the picture of recombination rate variation in vertebrates, with low but nonzero heritability, and a major locus that is homologous to one detected in several other species. This work also highlights the utility of using large-scale livestock data to understand biological processes.

genetics↗

Using high-throughput phenotypes to enable genomic selection by inferring genotypes

In this paper we develop and test a method which uses high-throughput phenotypes to infer the genotypes of an individual. The inferred genotypes can then be used to perform genomic selection. Previous methods which used high-throughput phenotype data to increase the accuracy of selection assumed that the high-throughput phenotypes correlate with selection targets. When this is not the case, we show that the high-throughput phenotypes can be used to determine which haplotypes an individual inherited from their parents, and thereby infer the individuals genotypes. We tested this method in two simulations. In the first simulation, we explored, how the accuracy of the inferred genotypes depended on the high-throughput phenotypes used and the genome of the species analysed. In the second simulation we explored whether using this method could increase genetic gain a plant breeding program by enabling genomic selection on non-genotyped individuals. In the first simulation, we found that genotype accuracy was higher if more high-throughput phenotypes were used and if those phenotypes had higher heritability. We also found that genotype accuracy decreased with an increasing size of the species genome. In the second simulation, we found that the inferred genotypes could be used to enable genomic selection on non-genotyped individuals and increase genetic gain compared to random selection, or in some scenarios phenotypic selection. This method presents a novel way for using high-throughput phenotype data in breeding programs. As the quality of high-throughput phenotypes increases and the cost decreases, this method may enable the use of genomic selection on large numbers of non-genotyped individuals.

genetics↗

Phasing and imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism data of missing parents of bi-parental plant populations

This paper presents an extension to a heuristic method for phasing and imputation of genotypes of descendants in bi-parental populations so that it can phase and impute genotypes of parents of bi-parental populations that are fully ungenotyped or partially genotyped. The imputed genotypes of the parent are then used to impute low-density genotyped descendants of the bi-parental population to high-density. The extension works in three steps. First, it identifies whether a parent has no or low-density genotypes available and it identifies all of its relatives that have high-density genotypes. Second, using the high-density information of relatives, it determines whether the parent is homozygous or heterozygous for a given locus. Third, it phases heterozygous positions of the parent by matching haplotypes to its relatives. We implemented the new algorithm in an extension of the AlphaPlantImptue software and tested its accuracy of imputing missing parent genotypes in simulated bi-parental populations from different scenarios. We also tested the accuracy of imputation of the missing parents descendants using the true genotype of the parent and compared this to using the imputed genotypes of the parent. Our results show that across all scenarios, the accuracy of imputation of a parent, measured as the correlation between true and imputed genotypes, was > 0.98 and did not drop below [~] 0.96. The imputation accuracy of a parent was always higher when it was inbred than when it was outbred and when it had low-density genotypes. Including ancestors of the parent at HD, increasing the number of crosses and the number of high-density descendants all increased the accuracy of imputation. The high imputation accuracy achieved for the parent across all scenarios translated to little or no impact on the accuracy of imputation of its descendants at low-density. Key MessageNew fast and accurate method for phasing and imputation of SNP chip genotypes within diploid bi-parental plant populations.

genetics↗

AlphaFamImpute: high accuracy imputation in full-sib families from genotype-by-sequencing data

SummaryAlphaFamImpute is an imputation package for calling, phasing, and imputing genome-wide genotypes in outbred full-sib families from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array and genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) data. GBS data is increasingly being used to genotype individuals, especially when SNP arrays do not exist for a population of interest. Low-coverage GBS produces data with a large number of missing or incorrect naive genotype calls, which can be improved by identifying shared haplotype segments between full-sib individuals. Here we present AlphaFamImpute, an algorithm specifically designed to exploit the genetic structure of full-sib families. It performs imputation using a two-step approach. In the first step it phases and imputes parental genotypes based on the segregation states of their offspring (that is, which pair of parental haplotypes the offspring inherited). In the second step it phases and imputes the offspring genotypes by detecting which haplotype segments the offspring inherited from their parents. With a series of simulations we find that AlphaFamImpute obtains high accuracy genotypes, even when the parents are not genotyped and individuals are sequenced at less than 1x coverage. Availability and implementationAlphaFamImpute is available as a Python package from the AlphaGenes website, http://www.AlphaGenes.roslin.ed.ac.uk/AlphaFamImpute. Contactawhalen@roslin.ed.ac.uk Supplementary informationA complete description of the methods is available in the supplementary information.

genetics↗