Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/361345

Prevalence and determinants of smoking status among university students: Artvin Coruh University sample

Karado?an, D.·Önal, O.·Kanbay, Y.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background and aimWhile smoking prevalence has decreased in many developed countries, in others it is still an increasing risk factor for public health, especially among young adults. In this study we aimed to find the factors affecting university students smoking status.\n\nMethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted between March and June 2017 with a simple random sampling method. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, cigarette smoking status, and the related risk factors. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis with the Backward:LR test were performed.\n\nResultsOut of 2723 students, 2505 students data were available and suitable for analysis. Mean participant age was 20.9{+/-}2.5, with female dominance (58.9%). Students studying in two-year degree departments comprised 45.6% of the study population, and the remaining 54.4% of the students were in 4-year degree departments. In terms of parental smoking habits, 36.1% reported a smoker father, while that rate was 10.3% for mothers and 15.0% for siblings. Current smokers represented 27.9% of the group: 46% among males and 15.3% among females. Mean age for beginning smoking was 16.34{+/-}2.72, 15.65{+/-}2.67 for males, 16.34{+/-}2.72 for females (p<0.05). Mean Fagerstromtest score was 4.43{+/-}1.82, and female students had lower test scores than males (p<0.05). After controlling for potential confounders in multivariate analysis, it was seen that five factors were positively associated with current smoking (p<0.05): male gender (OR:3.43; 95%, CI:2.75-4.28), studying in two-year programs (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.39-2.18), having at least one close family member who is a smoker (OR:1.63; 95% CI:1.31-2.04), having close friends who are all smokers (OR:1.81; 95% CI: 1.40-2.33), and alcohol consumption (OR:4.39; 95% CI: 3.51-5.49).\n\nConclusionOur study showed a higher smoking rate among our study population, both compared to similar nationalstudies and the countrys overall smoking rate. Underlying factors should be evaluated via qualitative studies and preventive strategies should be implemented accordingly.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

epidemiologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Karado?an, D., Önal, O., Kanbay, Y.. 2018-07-03. Prevalence and determinants of smoking status among university students: Artvin Coruh University sample. https://doi.org/10.1101/361345

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2018

Translating surveillance data into incidence estimates

Monitoring a population for a disease requires the hosts to be sampled and tested for the pathogen. This results in sampling series from which to estimate the disease incidence, i.e. the proportion of hosts infected. Existing estimation methods assume that disease incidence is not changing between monitoring rounds, resulting in underestimation of the disease incidence. In this paper we develop an incidence estimation model accounting for epidemic growth with monitoring rounds sampling varying incidence. We also show how to accommodate the asymptomatic period characteristic to most diseases. For practical use, we produce an approximation of the model, which is subsequently shown accurate for relevant epidemic and sampling parameters. Both the approximation and the full model are applied to stochastic spatial simulations of epidemics. The results prove their consistency for a very wide range of situations.

epidemiology↗
bioRxiv2018

The Swiss Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia registry: objectives, methods and first results

Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare hereditary, multi-organ disease caused by defects in ciliary structure and function. It results in a wide range of clinical manifestations, most commonly in the upper and lower airways. Central data collection in national and international registries is essential to studying the epidemiology of rare diseases and filling in gaps in knowledge of diseases such as PCD. For this reason, the Swiss Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Registry (CH-PCD) was founded in 2013 as a collaborative project between epidemiologists and adult and paediatric pulmonologists.\n\nThe registry records patients of any age, suffering from PCD, who are treated and resident in Switzerland. It collects information from patients identified through physicians, diagnostic facilities, and patient organisations. The registry dataset contains data on diagnostic evaluations, lung function, microbiology and imaging, symptoms, treatments, and hospitalizations.\n\nBy May 2018, CH-PCD has contacted 566 physicians of different specialties and identified 134 patients with PCD. At present this number represents an overall 1 in 63,000 prevalence of people diagnosed with PCD in Switzerland. Prevalence differs by age and region; it is highest in children and adults younger than 30 years, and in Espace Mittelland. The median age of patients in the registry is 25 years (range 5-73), and 49 patients have a definite PCD diagnosis based on recent international guidelines. Data from CH-PCD are contributed to international collaborative studies and the registry facilitates patient identification for nested studies.\n\nCH-PCD has proven to be a valuable research tool that already has highlighted weaknesses in PCD clinical practice in Switzerland. Development of centralised diagnostic and management centres and adherence to international guidelines are needed to improve diagnosis and management--particularly for adult PCD patients.

epidemiology↗
bioRxiv2018

Perfect Counterfactuals for Epidemic Simulations

Simulation studies are often used to predict the expected impact of control measures in infectious disease outbreaks. Typically, two independent sets of simulations are conducted, one with the intervetnion, and one without, and epidemic sizes (or some related metric) are compared to estimate the effect of the intervention. Since it is possible that controlled epidemics are larger than uncontrolled ones if there is substantial stochastic variation between epidemics, uncertainty intervals from this approach can include a negative effect even for an effective intervention. To more precisely estimate the number of cases an intervention will prevent within a single epidemic, here we develop a single world approach to matching simulations of controlled epidemics to their exact uncontrolled counterfac-tual. Our method borrows concepts from percolation approaches prune out possible epidemic histories and create potential epidemic graph that can be realized to create perfectly matched controlled and uncontrolled epidemics. We present an implementation of this method for a common class of compartmental models, and its application in a simple SIR model. Results illustrate how, at the cost of some computation time, this method substantially narrows confidence intervals and avoids non-sensical inferences.

epidemiology↗