bioRxiv · 10.1101/451153
Perfect Counterfactuals for Epidemic Simulations
Abstract
Simulation studies are often used to predict the expected impact of control measures in infectious disease outbreaks. Typically, two independent sets of simulations are conducted, one with the intervetnion, and one without, and epidemic sizes (or some related metric) are compared to estimate the effect of the intervention. Since it is possible that controlled epidemics are larger than uncontrolled ones if there is substantial stochastic variation between epidemics, uncertainty intervals from this approach can include a negative effect even for an effective intervention. To more precisely estimate the number of cases an intervention will prevent within a single epidemic, here we develop a single world approach to matching simulations of controlled epidemics to their exact uncontrolled counterfac-tual. Our method borrows concepts from percolation approaches prune out possible epidemic histories and create potential epidemic graph that can be realized to create perfectly matched controlled and uncontrolled epidemics. We present an implementation of this method for a common class of compartmental models, and its application in a simple SIR model. Results illustrate how, at the cost of some computation time, this method substantially narrows confidence intervals and avoids non-sensical inferences.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Kaminsky, J., Keegan, L. T., Metcalf, C. J. E., Lessler, J.. 2018-10-26. Perfect Counterfactuals for Epidemic Simulations. https://doi.org/10.1101/451153
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.