Phylogenetic distribution of roseobacticides in the Roseobacter group and their effect on microalgae

Abstract

The Roseobacter-group species Phaeobacter inhibens produces the antibacterial tropodithietic acid (TDA) and the algaecidal roseobacticides with both compound classes sharing part of the same biosynthetic pathway. The purpose of this study was to investigate the production of roseobacticides more broadly in TDA-producing roseobacters and to compare the effect of producers and non-producers on microalgae. Of 33 roseobacters analyzed, roseobacticide production was a unique feature of TDA-producing P. inhibens, P. gallaeciensis and P. piscinae strains. One TDA-producing Phaeobacter strain, 27-4, was unable to produce roseobacticides, possibly due to a transposable element. TDA-producing Ruegeria mobilis and Pseudovibrio did not produce roseobacticides. Addition of roseobacticide-containing bacterial extracts affected the growth of the microalgae Rhodomonas salina, Thalassiosira pseudonana and Emiliania huxleyi, while growth of Tetraselmis suecica was unaffected. During co-cultivation, growth of E. huxleyi was initially stimulated by the roseobacticide producer DSM 17395, while the subsequent decline in algal cell numbers during senescence was enhanced. Strain 27-4 that does not produce roseobacticides had no effect on algal growth. Both bacterial strains, DSM 17395 and 27-4, grew during co-cultivation presumably utilizing algal exudates. Furthermore, TDA-producing roseobacters have potential as probiotics in marine larviculture and it is promising that the live feed Tetraselmis was unaffected by roseobacticides-containing extracts.\n\nOriginality-significance statementSome Roseobacter-group bacteria produce the antibacterial compound tropodithetic acid (TDA) and have potential as probiotics in marine aquaculture. However, a few of these strains additionally produce algaecidal compounds, the roseobacticides, which would restrict their use in marine larviculture where algae are used as live feed for fish larvae. We herein found that roseobacticides are limited to TDA-producing Phaeobacter strains and were not biosynthesized by TDA-producers outside this genus. Roseobacticides affected several strains of microalgae, but not the chlorophyte that is used as live feed in the aquaculture industry. Thus, the application of Roseobacter strains as probiotics is not hampered. Furthermore, these results demonstrate how Roseobacter-group strains act as gardeners of microalgae and thereby would be involved in environmental processes on a larger scale.