Biology subjects

Sonnenschein, E. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Sonnenschein, E. C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Expanding the genome information on Bacillales for biosynthetic gene cluster discovery

This study showcases 121 new genomes of spore-forming Bacillales from strains collected globally from a variety of habitats, assembled using Oxford Nanopore long-read and MGI short-read sequences. Bacilli are renowned for their capacity to produce diverse secondary metabolites with use in agriculture, biotechnology, and medicine. These secondary metabolites are encoded within biosynthetic gene clusters (smBGCs). smBGCs have significant research interest due to their potential for the discovery of new bioactivate compounds. Our dataset includes 62 complete genomes, 2 at chromosome level, and 57 at contig level, covering a genomic size range from 3.50 Mb to 7.15 Mb. Phylotaxonomic analysis revealed that these genomes span 16 genera, with 69 of them belonging to Bacillus. A total of 1,176 predicted BGCs were identified by in silico genome mining. We anticipate that the open-access data presented here will expand the reported genomic information of spore-forming Bacillales and facilitate a deeper understanding of the genetic basis of Bacillales potential for secondary metabolite production.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2023

Impact of host species on assembly, composition, and functional profiles of phycosphere microbiomes

Microalgal microbiomes play vital roles in the growth and health of their host, however, their composition and functions remain only partially characterized, especially across microalgal phyla. In this study, a natural seawater microbiome was introduced to three distinct, axenic species of microalgae, the haptophyte Isochrysis galbana, the chlorophyte Tetraselmis suecica, and the diatom Conticribra weissflogii (previously Thalassiosira), and its divergence and assembly was monitored over 49 days using 16S rRNA amplicon and metagenomic analyses. The microbiomes had a high degree of host specificity in terms of taxonomic composition and potential functions, including CAZymes profiles. Rhodobacteraceae and Flavobacteriaceae families were abundant across all microalgal hosts, but I .galbana microbiomes diverged further from T. suecica and C. weissflogii microbiomes. I .galbana microbiomes had a much higher relative abundance of Flavobacteriaceae, whereas the two other algal microbiomes had higher relative abundances of Rhodobacteraceae. This could be due to the mixotrophic nature of I. galbana affecting the carbohydrate composition available to the microbiomes, which was supported by the CAZymes profile of I. galbana microbiomes diverging further from those of T. suecica and C. weissflogii microbiomes. Finally, the presence of denitrification and other anaerobic pathways was found exclusively in microbiomes of C. weissflogii potentially resulting from anoxic microenvironments in aggregates formed by this diatom during the experiment. These results underline the deterministic role of the microalgal host species on microbiome composition and functional profiles along with other factors, such as trophic mode of the microalgal host. ImportanceAs the main primary producers of the oceans, microalgae serve as cornerstones of the ecosystems they are part of. Additionally, they are increasingly used for biotechnological purposes such as the production of nutraceuticals, pigments, and antioxidants. Since the bacterial microbiomes of microalgae can affect their hosts in beneficial and detrimental ways, understanding these microbiomes is crucial to both ecological and applied roles of microalgae. The present study advances the understanding of microalgal microbiome assembly, composition, and functionality across microalgal phyla, which may inform modeling and engineering of microalgal microbiomes for biotechnological purposes.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2018

Phylogenetic distribution of roseobacticides in the Roseobacter group and their effect on microalgae

The Roseobacter-group species Phaeobacter inhibens produces the antibacterial tropodithietic acid (TDA) and the algaecidal roseobacticides with both compound classes sharing part of the same biosynthetic pathway. The purpose of this study was to investigate the production of roseobacticides more broadly in TDA-producing roseobacters and to compare the effect of producers and non-producers on microalgae. Of 33 roseobacters analyzed, roseobacticide production was a unique feature of TDA-producing P. inhibens, P. gallaeciensis and P. piscinae strains. One TDA-producing Phaeobacter strain, 27-4, was unable to produce roseobacticides, possibly due to a transposable element. TDA-producing Ruegeria mobilis and Pseudovibrio did not produce roseobacticides. Addition of roseobacticide-containing bacterial extracts affected the growth of the microalgae Rhodomonas salina, Thalassiosira pseudonana and Emiliania huxleyi, while growth of Tetraselmis suecica was unaffected. During co-cultivation, growth of E. huxleyi was initially stimulated by the roseobacticide producer DSM 17395, while the subsequent decline in algal cell numbers during senescence was enhanced. Strain 27-4 that does not produce roseobacticides had no effect on algal growth. Both bacterial strains, DSM 17395 and 27-4, grew during co-cultivation presumably utilizing algal exudates. Furthermore, TDA-producing roseobacters have potential as probiotics in marine larviculture and it is promising that the live feed Tetraselmis was unaffected by roseobacticides-containing extracts.\n\nOriginality-significance statementSome Roseobacter-group bacteria produce the antibacterial compound tropodithetic acid (TDA) and have potential as probiotics in marine aquaculture. However, a few of these strains additionally produce algaecidal compounds, the roseobacticides, which would restrict their use in marine larviculture where algae are used as live feed for fish larvae. We herein found that roseobacticides are limited to TDA-producing Phaeobacter strains and were not biosynthesized by TDA-producers outside this genus. Roseobacticides affected several strains of microalgae, but not the chlorophyte that is used as live feed in the aquaculture industry. Thus, the application of Roseobacter strains as probiotics is not hampered. Furthermore, these results demonstrate how Roseobacter-group strains act as gardeners of microalgae and thereby would be involved in environmental processes on a larger scale.

microbiology↗