Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.11.18.688816

Perceiving Instability: How Expectations Bias Sensorimotor Processing in Balance Control

Abstract

Maintaining balance requires rapid integration of sensory input with top-down sensorimotor predictions. Predictive coding frameworks propose that mismatches between expected and actual sensory input ("prediction errors") drive perceptual inference. Although these frameworks have been highly influential in sensory neuroscience, it remains unclear whether they operate similarly in fast-acting sensorimotor systems such as human balance. Using electroencephalography (EEG) and discrete postural perturbations via support surface translations, we independently manipulated expectations and sensory input. Participants were primed to expect small or large perturbations, with occasional violations in which the delivered perturbation differed from expectation. We found that subjective perception of instability was shaped by expectation alone, regardless of perturbation magnitude. Similarly, pre-perturbation beta-band suppression and post-perturbation gamma activity tracked expected perturbation magnitude, with the latter strongly associated with expectation-induced perceptual biases (r = 0.69, pBON = 0.001). In contrast, both the balance N1 (a well-established stimulus-evoked cortical potential linked to the postural response) and objective behavioural markers of postural instability were determined primarily by perturbation magnitude. Crucially, neither perception nor early neural or behavioural markers appeared to encode prediction errors arising from expectation violations. Together, these findings identify boundary conditions on predictive coding in sensorimotor control, showing that during fast, reactive behaviour, perceptual inference may be shaped more strongly by expectations than by mismatch signals, even as early neural and motor responses remain driven primarily by sensory input. Significance StatementPerception is often explained through predictive coding, a framework in which the brain compares incoming sensory input with internal expectations and updates representations based on mismatches, or prediction errors. However, it remains unclear whether these perceptual inference processes operate similarly in fast, ecologically relevant sensorimotor systems, such as postural control. Our results show that top-down expectations shape perceptual experience and early cortical responses to postural perturbations, even when sensory input contradicts those expectations. Notably, these early neural markers showed limited sensitivity to prediction errors in this rapid, reactive context. Together, these findings identify conditions under which perceptual inference may rely more strongly on expectations than on sensory mismatch, refining predictive coding accounts of fast, reactive behaviour. ClassificationBiological Science (Neuroscience)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Parr, J. V. V., Mills, R., Kal, E. C., Bronstein, A. M., Ellmers, T. J.. 2025-11-18. Perceiving Instability: How Expectations Bias Sensorimotor Processing in Balance Control. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.18.688816

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗