Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Parr, J. V. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Parr, J. V. V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Perceiving Instability: How Expectations Bias Sensorimotor Processing in Balance Control

Maintaining balance requires rapid integration of sensory input with top-down sensorimotor predictions. Predictive coding frameworks propose that mismatches between expected and actual sensory input ("prediction errors") drive perceptual inference. Although these frameworks have been highly influential in sensory neuroscience, it remains unclear whether they operate similarly in fast-acting sensorimotor systems such as human balance. Using electroencephalography (EEG) and discrete postural perturbations via support surface translations, we independently manipulated expectations and sensory input. Participants were primed to expect small or large perturbations, with occasional violations in which the delivered perturbation differed from expectation. We found that subjective perception of instability was shaped by expectation alone, regardless of perturbation magnitude. Similarly, pre-perturbation beta-band suppression and post-perturbation gamma activity tracked expected perturbation magnitude, with the latter strongly associated with expectation-induced perceptual biases (r = 0.69, pBON = 0.001). In contrast, both the balance N1 (a well-established stimulus-evoked cortical potential linked to the postural response) and objective behavioural markers of postural instability were determined primarily by perturbation magnitude. Crucially, neither perception nor early neural or behavioural markers appeared to encode prediction errors arising from expectation violations. Together, these findings identify boundary conditions on predictive coding in sensorimotor control, showing that during fast, reactive behaviour, perceptual inference may be shaped more strongly by expectations than by mismatch signals, even as early neural and motor responses remain driven primarily by sensory input. Significance StatementPerception is often explained through predictive coding, a framework in which the brain compares incoming sensory input with internal expectations and updates representations based on mismatches, or prediction errors. However, it remains unclear whether these perceptual inference processes operate similarly in fast, ecologically relevant sensorimotor systems, such as postural control. Our results show that top-down expectations shape perceptual experience and early cortical responses to postural perturbations, even when sensory input contradicts those expectations. Notably, these early neural markers showed limited sensitivity to prediction errors in this rapid, reactive context. Together, these findings identify conditions under which perceptual inference may rely more strongly on expectations than on sensory mismatch, refining predictive coding accounts of fast, reactive behaviour. ClassificationBiological Science (Neuroscience)

neuroscience↗

Cortical, muscular, and kinetic activity underpinning attentional focus strategies during visuomotor control

Focusing internally on movement control or bodily sensations is frequently shown to disrupt the effectiveness and efficiency of motor control when compared to focusing externally on the outcome of movement. Whilst the behavioural consequences of these attentional strategies are well documented, it is unclear how they are explained at the corticomuscular level. The aim of the present study was to investigate how attentional focus strategies affect kinetic, cortical, muscular, and corticomuscular activity during an isometric force precision task. In a repeated measures design, we measured force, EEG and EMG activity from twenty-seven participants who performed 160 isometric contractions of the right hand whilst encouraged to adopt either an internal or external focus through a combination of instructions, secondary tasks, and self-report evaluations. Results indicated that focusing internally led to poorer force accuracy and steadiness compared to an external focus. An internal focus also increased muscle activity of the forearm flexor, increased EEG alpha activity across the parieto-occipital cortex, lowered frontal midline EEG theta activity, and lowered beta corticomuscular coherence between the forearm flexor and contralateral motor cortex. The results of this study provide a holistic understanding of how attentional focus strategies alter neuromuscular control during an isometric force precision task, paving the way for exploring how the behavioural consequences of attentional strategies can be explained at the corticomuscular levels across a wide range of motor tasks and contexts.

neuroscience↗

All talk? Left temporal alpha oscillations are not specific to verbal-analytical processing during conscious motor control

The present study tested the validity of inferring verbal-analytic motor processing from EEG left-temporal alpha activity. Participants (n = 20) reached for and transport a jar under three conditions: one control condition and two self-talk conditions aimed at eliciting either task-unrelated verbal processing or task-related conscious control, while 32-channel EEG and kinematics were recorded. Compared to the control condition, both self-talk conditions elicited greater self-reported levels of verbal processing, but only the task-related self-talk condition was accompanied by greater left temporal activity (i.e., EEG alpha power decreased) during movement production. However, this increase was not localised to the left temporal region but was rather evident over all scalp regions examined, suggesting an interpretation more consistent with diminished neural efficiency. No effects for left temporal-frontal (T7-Fz) connectivity were detected across conditions. Our results failed to endorse left-temporal EEG alpha activity as valid index of verbal-analytic processing during motor tasks.

neuroscience↗