Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.18.665463

The yEvo Mutation Browser: Enhancing student understanding of experimental evolution and genomics through interactive data visualization

Abstract

Experimental evolution is a powerful method for studying the relationship between genotype and phenotype by observing how populations genetically adapt to controlled selective pressures. In educational settings, this approach also offers a dynamic way for students to engage with molecular genetics. One such educational effort, known as "yEvo" (yeast evolution), introduces experimental evolution into high school classrooms, allowing students to evolve the bakers yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under various stressors and investigate the resulting genetic changes. While the hands-on experiments have been successful in fostering student interest and understanding of evolution, the downstream data analysis (interpreting whole-genome sequencing results of evolved yeast compared to the ancestor) remains a challenge. Students often struggle to grasp the significance of their mutated genes and lack the broader context to determine which mutations are most phenotypically relevant. To address these issues, we developed the yEvo Mutation Browser, an intuitive web tool designed to assist students and researchers alike in visualizing and contextualizing genome sequencing data. Developed using R Shiny, this tool features an interactive chromosome map displaying mutated genes, graphs categorizing mutation types, a gene viewer illustrating specific mutation sites within genes, and a protein view that maps specific mutations onto protein structures. The app also features an option for non-yEvo-affiliated users to upload their own experimental evolution or genetic screen datasets and compare them with all yEvo data collected since 2018. The yEvo Mutation Browser streamlines data interpretation, helping students understand how organisms employ diverse genetic strategies to adapt to environmental stress. In the future, this framework could be adapted for use with other model organisms, offering a valuable resource for both genetics research and education. SignificanceBringing novel research into the classroom can transform how students learn science. The yEvo project engages high school students in experimental evolution, enabling them to witness natural selection in action and connect genetic mutations to evolutionary outcomes. By providing an accessible web-based tool, the "yEvo Mutation Browser," this work lowers barriers to interpreting genome sequencing data, allowing students, teachers, and researchers alike to explore how yeast populations adapt to diverse stress conditions. This resource not only strengthens STEM education by making cutting-edge genetics more approachable, but also builds a shared dataset that enriches the broader yeast genetics community.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anderson, L., Schoch, J., Anastasia, E., Wang, V. Y.-S., Zeng, Z., Gorjifard, S., Dunham, M. J.. 2025-07-22. The yEvo Mutation Browser: Enhancing student understanding of experimental evolution and genomics through interactive data visualization. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.18.665463

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Gelato streamlines reproducible and auditable assembly of Western blot figures

Western blotting has been widely used for decades, yet figure preparation remains unstandardized, error-prone and difficult to audit. Gelato is a free Fiji/ImageJ plugin that streamlines intuitive figure preparation, logs processing coordinates, provides a straightforward audit platform andenables reproduction from raw images. By making these capabilities simple and accessible, Gelato facilitates robust Western blot reporting, reducing a substantial burden on authors and reviewers while strengthening scientific rigor.

scientific communication and education↗

Perceived Risk and Barriers to Open and Responsible Research Across Fifteen UK Universities

Open research practices are increasingly promoted to improve research transparency, reproducibility, accessibility, and societal impact. Despite growing support from research funders, institutions, and policy initiatives, adoption remains uneven across disciplines and research communities. This study examined perceived risks and barriers associated with 14 FORRT Guideline areas using qualitative responses from the UK Reproducibility Network Open and Transparent Research Practices Survey (N = 2,567), conducted across 15 UK higher education institutions. Free-text responses describing risks and barriers were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. A total of 3,951 relevant comments generated 3,433 coded references to barriers and risks. Three interconnected clusters emerged. Individual concerns included lack of motivation, fear of losing intellectual credit, and concerns about exposing mistakes and criticism. Systemic and institutional barriers included lack of time and resources, inadequate infrastructure, insufficient training and support, lack of incentives and recognition, unclear guidance, disciplinary and methodological challenges, and tensions between open practices and intellectual property requirements. Ethical and quality-related concerns included risks to participant confidentiality and privacy, challenges associated with sensitive data, concerns about inappropriate application of open research practices across different research traditions, perceived impacts on research quality and innovation, and potential effects on public trust in research. Lack of time and resources was the most frequently reported barrier. Across responses, barriers were commonly described as interdependent, with shortcomings in funding, infrastructure, institutional support, incentives, and training reinforcing one another. Respondents largely supported the principles underpinning open research but highlighted substantial practical, professional, and ethical challenges to implementation. These findings suggest that increasing open research adoption requires more than policy mandates or awareness-raising activities. Sustainable uptake will depend on aligned incentives, adequate infrastructure and support, recognition of methodological diversity, and approaches that enable openness to be implemented responsibly across different research contexts.

scientific communication and education↗

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗