Does stimulus order affect central tendency and serial dependence in vestibular path integration?

Abstract

The reproduction of a perceived stimulus, such as a distance or a duration, is often influenced by two biases. Central tendency indicates that reproductions are biased toward the mean of the stimulus distribution. Serial dependence reflects that the reproduction of the current stimulus is influenced by the previous stimulus. Although these biases are well-documented, their origins remain to be determined. Studies on duration reproduction suggest that autocorrelation within a stimulus sequence may play a role. In this study, we explored whether the level of autocorrelation in a stimulus sequence affects central tendency and serial dependence in vestibular path integration. Participants (n = 24) performed a vestibular distance reproduction task in total darkness by actively replicating a passively moved stimulus distance with a linear motion platform. We compared two conditions: a high-autocorrelation condition, where stimulus distances followed a random walk, and a no-autocorrelation condition, where the same distances were presented in a randomly shuffled order. We quantified both biases using two approaches: separate simple linear regressions and a joint multiple linear regression model that accounts for the autocorrelation in the stimulus sequence. Simple linear regressions revealed that central tendency was weaker and serial dependence reversed in the high-autocorrelation condition compared to the no-autocorrelation condition. However, these differences were no longer observed in the multiple linear regression analysis, indicating that these biases were independent of the specific stimulus sequence protocol. We conclude that these perceptual biases in vestibular path integration persist regardless of stimulus autocorrelation, suggesting that they reflect robust strategies of the brain to process vestibular information in self-motion perception. Author summaryHow are we able to successfully navigate our surroundings? An essential part of navigation is distance estimation based on self-motion signals. We previously found that distance reproductions based on vestibular self-motion signals were affected by stimulus history. Reproductions showed a central tendency toward the mean of the stimulus distribution and an attractive serial dependence toward the immediately preceding stimulus distance. The stimulus distances were presented in a low-autocorrelation, randomized order. Here we ask whether reproductions show the same central tendency and serial dependence when consecutive stimulus distances are similar (i.e., in a high-autocorrelation, random-walk order). Participants performed a distance reproduction task in the dark: a linear motion platform first passively moved the participant over a stimulus distance, after which they actively reproduced this distance by steering the platform back to the estimated start position. We found that the reproductions showed similar central tendency and attractive serial dependence in both a no- and high-autocorrelation condition, but only if the analysis accounted for the covariation of the two effects in the high-autocorrelation condition. In conclusion, our findings indicate that central tendency and serial dependence of vestibular distance reproductions are not a result of the stimulus sequence protocol, but have neurocognitive origins.