Biology subjects

Willemsen, S. C. M. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Willemsen, S. C. M. J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Does stimulus order affect central tendency and serial dependence in vestibular path integration?

The reproduction of a perceived stimulus, such as a distance or a duration, is often influenced by two biases. Central tendency indicates that reproductions are biased toward the mean of the stimulus distribution. Serial dependence reflects that the reproduction of the current stimulus is influenced by the previous stimulus. Although these biases are well-documented, their origins remain to be determined. Studies on duration reproduction suggest that autocorrelation within a stimulus sequence may play a role. In this study, we explored whether the level of autocorrelation in a stimulus sequence affects central tendency and serial dependence in vestibular path integration. Participants (n = 24) performed a vestibular distance reproduction task in total darkness by actively replicating a passively moved stimulus distance with a linear motion platform. We compared two conditions: a high-autocorrelation condition, where stimulus distances followed a random walk, and a no-autocorrelation condition, where the same distances were presented in a randomly shuffled order. We quantified both biases using two approaches: separate simple linear regressions and a joint multiple linear regression model that accounts for the autocorrelation in the stimulus sequence. Simple linear regressions revealed that central tendency was weaker and serial dependence reversed in the high-autocorrelation condition compared to the no-autocorrelation condition. However, these differences were no longer observed in the multiple linear regression analysis, indicating that these biases were independent of the specific stimulus sequence protocol. We conclude that these perceptual biases in vestibular path integration persist regardless of stimulus autocorrelation, suggesting that they reflect robust strategies of the brain to process vestibular information in self-motion perception. Author summaryHow are we able to successfully navigate our surroundings? An essential part of navigation is distance estimation based on self-motion signals. We previously found that distance reproductions based on vestibular self-motion signals were affected by stimulus history. Reproductions showed a central tendency toward the mean of the stimulus distribution and an attractive serial dependence toward the immediately preceding stimulus distance. The stimulus distances were presented in a low-autocorrelation, randomized order. Here we ask whether reproductions show the same central tendency and serial dependence when consecutive stimulus distances are similar (i.e., in a high-autocorrelation, random-walk order). Participants performed a distance reproduction task in the dark: a linear motion platform first passively moved the participant over a stimulus distance, after which they actively reproduced this distance by steering the platform back to the estimated start position. We found that the reproductions showed similar central tendency and attractive serial dependence in both a no- and high-autocorrelation condition, but only if the analysis accounted for the covariation of the two effects in the high-autocorrelation condition. In conclusion, our findings indicate that central tendency and serial dependence of vestibular distance reproductions are not a result of the stimulus sequence protocol, but have neurocognitive origins.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Central tendency and serial dependence in vestibular path integration

Path integration, the process of updating ones position using successive self-motion signals, has previously been studied using visual distance reproduction tasks in which optic flow patterns provide information about traveled distance. These studies have reported that reproduced distances show two types of systematic biases: central tendency and serial dependence. In the present study, we investigated whether these biases are also present in vestibular path integration. Participants were seated on a linear motion platform and performed a distance reproduction task in total darkness. The platform first passively moved the participant a pre-defined stimulus distance which they then actively reproduced by steering the platform back the same distance. Stimulus distances were sampled from short- and long-distance probability distributions and presented in either a randomized order or in separate blocks to study the effect of presentation context. Similar to the effects observed in visual path integration, we found that reproduced distances showed an overall positive central tendency effect as well as a positive, attractive serial dependence effect. Furthermore, reproduction behavior was affected by presentation context. These results were mostly consistent with predictions of a Bayesian Kalman-filter model, originally proposed for visual path integration. New & NoteworthyDistance reproduction tasks based on visual information about the traveled distance have shown that reproductions are biased by central tendency and serial dependence effects. Here, we show that distance reproductions based on vestibular signals show similar biases and that the reproductions are affected by the presentation order of the stimulus distances.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Natural statistics of head roll: implications for Bayesian inference in spatial orientation

We previously proposed a Bayesian model of multisensory integration in spatial orientation (1). Using a Gaussian prior, centered on an upright head orientation, this model could explain various perceptual observations in roll-tilted participants, such as the subjective visual vertical, the subjective body tilt (1), the rod-and-frame effect (2), as well as their clinical (3) and age-related deficits (4). Because it is generally assumed that the prior reflects an accumulated history of previous head orientations, and recent work on natural head motion suggests non-Gaussian statistics, we examined how the model would perform with a non-Gaussian prior. In the present study, we first experimentally generalized the previous observations in showing that also the natural statistics of head orientation are characterized by long tails, best quantified as a t-location-scale distribution. Next, we compared the performance of the Bayesian model and various model variants using such a t-distributed prior to the original model with the Gaussian prior on their accounts of previously published data of the subjective visual vertical and subjective body tilt tasks. All of these variants performed substantially worse than the original model, suggesting a special value of the Gaussian prior. We provide computational and neurophysiological reasons for the implementation of such a prior, in terms of its associated precision-accuracy trade-off in vertical perception across the tilt range. New & NoteworthyIt has been argued that the brain uses Bayesian computations to process multiple sensory cues in vertical perception, including a prior centered on upright head orientation which is usually taken to be Gaussian. Here, we show that non-Gaussian prior distributions, although more akin to the statistics of head orientation during natural activities, provide a much worse explanation of such perceptual observations than a Gaussian prior.

neuroscience↗