Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.05.13.653358

The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals

Abstract

1The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) describes the selection coefficients (s) of newly arising mutations and fundamentally influences population genetic processes. However, the extent and mechanisms of DFE variation have not been systematically investigated across species with divergent phylogenetic histories and ecological functions. Here, we inferred the DFE in natural populations of eleven animal (sub)species, including humans, mice, fin whales, vaquitas, wolves, collared flycatchers, pied flycatchers, halictid bees, Drosophila, and mosquitoes. We find that the DFE co-varies with phylogeny, where the expected mutation effects are more similar in closely related species (Pagels{lambda} = 0.84, P = 0.01). Additionally, mammals have a higher proportion of strongly deleterious mutations (22% to 47% in mammals; 0.0% to 5.4% in insects and birds) and a lower proportion of weakly deleterious mutations than insects and birds. Population size is significantly negatively correlated with the expected impact of new deleterious mutations (PGLS{lambda}, P = 0.03), and the proportion of new beneficial mutations ([Formula], P < 0.001). These findings align with Fishers Geometric Model (FGM), which defines organismal complexity as the number of phenotypes under selection. Consistent with the FGMs predictions, we observe that mutations are more deleterious in complex organisms, while beneficial mutations occur more frequently in smaller populations to compensate for the drift load. Our study demonstrates strong phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of a fundamental population genetics parameter, and proposes that, through mechanisms of global epistasis, long-term population size and organismal complexity drive variation in the DFE across animals. 2 Significance StatementUnderstanding how mutations affect fitness is fundamental in evolution, but little is known about how and why the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) varies across species. In this study, we examine the DFE in diverse animal populations and show that closely related species exhibit similar patterns of mutation effects, with new mutations being more deleterious in mammals compared with birds and insects. Our findings corroborate Fishers Geometric Model, which explains the variation in the DFE across species as a function of organismal complexity and long-term population size. By connecting organismal complexity and population size with the DFE, we offer a phylogenetic view into the selective forces shaping species adaptation and evolution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lin, M., Chakraborty, S., Amorim, C. E. G., Morales, S. N., Beichman, A. C., Nunez-Valencia, P. G., Mah, J. C., Ronbinson, J. A., Kyriazis, C. C., Huber, C. D., Webb, A. E., Kocher, S. D., Archer, F. I., Moreno-Estrada, A., Wayne, R. K., Lohmueller, K. E.. 2025-05-13. The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.13.653358

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗