Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mah, J. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Mah, J. C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Inference of population demographic history captures differing evolutionary signals based on the number of individuals in the dataset

Accurate estimation of population demographic history is central to population genetics yet remains challenging due to the sensitivity of inference methods to the number of individuals and the demographic scenario assumed in inference. The site-frequency spectrum (SFS) of neutral variants, a widely used summary statistic of genetic variation, is particularly sensitive to demographic processes, but studies have shown that qualitative results from demographic inference, i.e., population expansion vs. contraction, can depend strongly on the number of individuals in the dataset. Here, we analyzed two simulated datasets and one empirical dataset characterized by an ancient population bottleneck followed by a recent population expansion. Fitting a two-epoch demographic model across a range of sample sizes, we found that inference shifted from signals of ancient population contraction at small sample sizes to signals of recent population expansion at large sample sizes. Other summary statistics, including Tajimas D and the proportion of singletons, also changed with sample size. We found that these changes of inferred evolutionary signals under a two-epoch model can be explained by the epoch which contributes the highest mean proportion of coalescent branch lengths. Our results highlight that demographic inference depends critically on the number of individuals analyzed and suggest that analyzing datasets at multiple sample sizes can reveal complementary aspects of population history.

evolutionary biology↗

The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals

1The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) describes the selection coefficients (s) of newly arising mutations and fundamentally influences population genetic processes. However, the extent and mechanisms of DFE variation have not been systematically investigated across species with divergent phylogenetic histories and ecological functions. Here, we inferred the DFE in natural populations of eleven animal (sub)species, including humans, mice, fin whales, vaquitas, wolves, collared flycatchers, pied flycatchers, halictid bees, Drosophila, and mosquitoes. We find that the DFE co-varies with phylogeny, where the expected mutation effects are more similar in closely related species (Pagels{lambda} = 0.84, P = 0.01). Additionally, mammals have a higher proportion of strongly deleterious mutations (22% to 47% in mammals; 0.0% to 5.4% in insects and birds) and a lower proportion of weakly deleterious mutations than insects and birds. Population size is significantly negatively correlated with the expected impact of new deleterious mutations (PGLS{lambda}, P = 0.03), and the proportion of new beneficial mutations ([Formula], P < 0.001). These findings align with Fishers Geometric Model (FGM), which defines organismal complexity as the number of phenotypes under selection. Consistent with the FGMs predictions, we observe that mutations are more deleterious in complex organisms, while beneficial mutations occur more frequently in smaller populations to compensate for the drift load. Our study demonstrates strong phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of a fundamental population genetics parameter, and proposes that, through mechanisms of global epistasis, long-term population size and organismal complexity drive variation in the DFE across animals. 2 Significance StatementUnderstanding how mutations affect fitness is fundamental in evolution, but little is known about how and why the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) varies across species. In this study, we examine the DFE in diverse animal populations and show that closely related species exhibit similar patterns of mutation effects, with new mutations being more deleterious in mammals compared with birds and insects. Our findings corroborate Fishers Geometric Model, which explains the variation in the DFE across species as a function of organismal complexity and long-term population size. By connecting organismal complexity and population size with the DFE, we offer a phylogenetic view into the selective forces shaping species adaptation and evolution.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary consequences of domestication on the selective effects of new amino acid changing mutations in canids

The domestication of wild canids led to dogs no longer living in the wild but instead residing alongside humans. Extreme changes in behavior and diet associated with domestication may have led to the relaxation of the selective pressure on traits that may be less important in the domesticated context. Thus, here we hypothesize that strongly deleterious mutations may have become less deleterious in domesticated populations. We test this hypothesis by estimating the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) for new amino acid changing mutations using whole-genome sequence data from 24 gray wolves and 61 breed dogs. We find that the DFE is strikingly similar across canids, with 26-28% of new amino acid changing mutations being neutral/nearly neutral (|s| < 1e-5), and 41-48% under strong purifying selection (|s| > 1e-2). Our results are robust to different model assumptions suggesting that the DFE is stable across short evolutionary timescales, even in the face of putative drastic changes in the selective pressure caused by artificial selection during domestication and breed formation. On par with previous works describing DFE evolution, our data indicate that the DFE of amino acid changing mutations depends more strongly on genome structure and organismal characteristics, and less so on shifting selective pressures or environmental factors. Given the constant DFE and previous data showing that genetic variants that differentiate wolf and dog populations are enriched in regulatory elements, we speculate that domestication may have had a larger impact on regulatory variation than on amino acid changing mutations. Significance StatementDomestication of dogs to live alongside humans resulted in a dramatic shift in the pressures of natural selection. Thus, comparing dogs and wolves offers a unique opportunity to assess how these shifts in selective pressures have impacted the fitness effects of individual mutations. In this project, we use patterns of genetic variation in dogs and wolves to estimate the distribution of fitness effects (DFE), or the proportions of amino acid changing mutations with varying fitness effects throughout the genome. Overall, we find that the DFE for amino acid changing mutations is similar between dogs and wolves. Even genes thought to be most affected by domestication show a similar DFE, suggesting that the DFE has remained stable over evolutionary time.

genetics↗

Inference of the demographic histories and selective effects of human gut commensal microbiota over the course of human history

Despite the importance of gut commensal microbiota to human health, there is little knowledge about their evolutionary histories, including their population demographic histories and their distributions of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations. Here, we infer the demographic histories and DFEs of 27 of the most highly prevalent and abundant commensal gut microbial species in North Americans over timescales exceeding human generations using a collection of lineages inferred from a panel of healthy hosts. We find overall reductions in genetic variation among commensal gut microbes sampled from a Western population relative to an African rural population. Additionally, some species in North American microbiomes display contractions in population size and others expansions, potentially occurring at several key historical moments in human history. DFEs across species vary from highly to mildly deleterious, with accessory genes experiencing more drift compared to core genes. Within genera, DFEs tend to be more congruent, reflective of underlying phylogenetic relationships. Taken together, these findings suggest that human commensal gut microbes have distinct evolutionary histories, possibly reflecting the unique roles of individual members of the microbiome.

evolutionary biology↗