Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.04.23.649202

Biodiversity temporal trends are reshaping food web structure and redundancy in riverine ecosystems

Danet, A.·El Madouri, L.·Bonnaffe, W.·Beckerman, A. P.·Mouchet, M.·Fontaine, C.·Thebault, E.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Biodiversity temporal changes are expected to profoundly impact ecosystem functioning and stability, yet large-scale empirical evidence remains limited. Bridging this gap requires aligning biodiversity temporal trends with food web theory and Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning research, both of which provide strong predictions about the ecological consequences of biodiversity loss. Most insights on those consequences currently rely on spatial comparisons of ecological communities, assuming they reflect temporal trends--a space-for-time substitution. Here, we analyze biodiversity and food web time series from over 400 riverine fish communities across France (1995-2018) to evaluate how biodiversity temporal trends reshape food web structure and community functioning. We examine relationships among species richness, community biomass, and three key food web metrics: connectance, weighted average trophic level, and trophic pathway redundancy. We also test the space-for-time hypothesis using spatial gradients and a theoretical food web model. Our structural equation models and robustness analysis reveal that declines in species richness strongly correlate with reduced community biomass, with top trophic-level species playing a disproportionate role in food web changes. Declining biomass is associated with the loss of top trophic levels and decreased connectance, while temporal changes in species richness negatively correlates with changes in connectance. Both biomass and species richness declines reduce trophic pathway redundancy, suggesting that biodiversity loss weakens community robustness to future perturbations. Our findings align with food web theory and Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning research, support the validity of space-for-time approaches for basic food web metrics, and demonstrate the relevance of food web metrics as indicators of ecosystem function and fragility. SignificanceRates of biodiversity loss raise urgent concerns about ecosystem functioning and stability, yet how biodiversity trends directly impact these critical processes remains unclear. For instance, food web & Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning research has delivered strong predictions about the ecological consequences of biodiversity loss but lack of empirical assessment. Using an extensive dataset of riverine fish communities, we link biodiversity trends to temporal changes in food web structure. We demonstrate that temporal changes in species richness and community biomass consistently associate with altered food web structure. We found that declining biodiversity reduces trophic pathway redundancy, likely increasing ecosystem vulnerability to perturbations. Our findings suggest that food web structure metrics could serve as valuable indicators for monitoring ecosystem health and guiding conservation strategies.

Explore related subjects

ecologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Danet, A., El Madouri, L., Bonnaffe, W., Beckerman, A. P., Mouchet, M., Fontaine, C., Thebault, E.. 2025-04-23. Biodiversity temporal trends are reshaping food web structure and redundancy in riverine ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.23.649202

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗
bioRxiv2026

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗