Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.07.25.605084

Phonological representations of auditory and visual speech in the occipito-temporal cortex and beyond

Abstract

Speech is a multisensory signal that can be extracted from the voice and the lips. Previous studies suggested that occipital and temporal regions encode both auditory and visual speech features but their precise location and nature remain unclear. We characterized brain activity using fMRI (in male and female) to functionally and individually define bilateral Fusiform Face Areas (FFA), the left Visual Word Form Area (VWFA), an audio-visual speech region in the left Superior Temporal Sulcus (lSTS) and control regions in bilateral Para-hippocampal Place Areas (PPA). In these regions, we performed multivariate patterns classification of corresponding phonemes (speech sounds) and visemes (lip movements). We observed that the VWFA and lSTS represent phonological information from both vision and sounds. The multisensory nature of phonological representations appeared selective to the anterior portion of VWFA, as we found viseme but not phoneme representation in adjacent FFA or even posterior VWFA, while PPA did not encode phonology in any modality. Interestingly, cross-modal decoding revealed aligned phonological representations across the senses in lSTS, but not in VWFA. A whole-brain cross-modal searchlight analysis additionally revealed aligned audio-visual phonological representations in bilateral pSTS and left somato-motor cortex overlapping with oro-facial articulators. Altogether, our results demonstrate that auditory and visual phonology are represented in the anterior VWFA, extending its functional coding beyond orthography. The geometries of auditory and visual representations do not align in the VWFA as they do in the STS and left somato-motor cortex, suggesting distinct multisensory representations across a distributed phonological network. Significance statementSpeech is a multisensory signal that can be extracted from the voice and the lips. Which brain regions encode both visual and auditory speech representations? We show that the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA) and the left Superior Temporal Sulcus (lSTS) both process phonological information from speech sounds and lip movements. However, while the lSTS aligns these representations across the senses, the VWFA does not, indicating different encoding mechanisms. These findings extend the functional role of the VWFA beyond reading. An additional whole-brain approach reveals shared representations in bilateral superior temporal cortex and left somato-motor cortex, indicating a distributed network for multisensory phonology.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Van Audenhaege, A., Mattioni, S., Cerpelloni, F., Remi, G., Arnaud, S., Collignon, O.. 2024-07-26. Phonological representations of auditory and visual speech in the occipito-temporal cortex and beyond. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.25.605084

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗