Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.06.28.601283

Organoid Models Derived from Primary Tumors and Patient-Derive Xenograft Tumors Reflect Platinum Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer Patients

Abstract

BackgroundOvarian cancer (OC) remains the deadliest gynecological cancer, primarily due to late-stage diagnosis and high rates of chemotherapy resistance and recurrence. Lack of representative preclinical models complicate the challenges of discovering effective therapies, especially for platinum-resistant OC. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models maintain the genetic characteristics of the original tumor and are ideal for testing candidate therapies in vivo, but their high cost limits their feasibility for high-throughput drug screening. Organoid models mimic the tumors 3D structure and preserve intra-tumoral heterogeneity. While organoids established directly from primary patient tumors are the optimal model for personalized drug response studies, the supply of primary tissue is often limited. Patient-derived xenograft tumors can be passaged in mice and provide a renewable source of cancer cells for organoids. This study aimed to determine if PDX-derived organoids (PDXOs) can reflect patient responses to chemotherapy similarly to primary patient-derived organoids (PDOs). Methods3D tumor organoid cultures were established from paired primary OC and PDX samples. Organoid viability after 72-hour treatment with paclitaxel (PTX), carboplatin (CBDCA), or their combination was compared between organoids derived directly from the patient or from the PDX models. The in vitro drug responses of PDXOs and PDOs were then compared to defined patient clinical responses: platinum-sensitive (initial response to standard platinum/taxol therapy lasting >6 months post-treatment), platinum-resistant (initial response to standard chemotherapy lasting < 6 months), or platinum-refractory (no initial response to standard chemotherapy). ResultsIn drug response assays, PDXOs and PDOs demonstrated similar sensitivity to standard chemotherapy and also reliably reflected patient responses based on the clinical designation of platinum sensitivity. While organoids derived from the ascites were smaller with a denser morphology, their drug response mirrored that of the organoids derived from solid tumor. Platinum-sensitive cases exhibited significant reductions (around 50% reduction) in organoid viability when treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, or their combination. Platinum-resistant or refractory organoids showed little to no reduction in viability with carboplatin or paclitaxel monotherapy or the combination. Organoids derived from one platinum-resistant case did show a small but significant reduction in viability with single-agent paclitaxel, suggesting that organoid models might predict response to second-line paclitaxel therapy. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that PDXOs respond to drugs similarly to PDOs and confirms that both models effectively mirror patient response to standard chemotherapy. This highlights the potential of PDXOs as renewable models for screening novel therapies and developing personalized strategies in OC. SIMPLE SUMMARYOvarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological cancer, largely due to its late diagnosis and resistance to chemotherapy. In order to identify novel therapies to treat ovarian cancer, we need better in vitro models that represent the genetic heterogeneity of the patient population. This study evaluates patient-derived organoid models established either directly from patient samples (PDOs) or from patient samples that were first passaged in mice and are referred to as patient-derived xenograft organoids (PDXOs). For each patient, organoid response to standard chemotherapy based on organoid viability assays was compared to the patients clinical designation of platinum sensitivity, which is categorized as platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory based on their response to standard chemotherapy. We demonstrated that both PDOs and PDXOs accurately reflect the patients clinical designation, suggesting their utility as effective models for testing new therapies and personalizing treatment. Importantly, by providing a renewable source of patient-derived cells, PDXOs extend the utility of each sample, making organoids essential tools for developing and refining personalized treatment strategies in oncology.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nikeghbal, P., Burke, D., Steinkamp, M. P.. 2024-07-02. Organoid Models Derived from Primary Tumors and Patient-Derive Xenograft Tumors Reflect Platinum Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer Patients. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.601283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

BAP1 loss and PRAME expression converge to remodel the tumor-immune ecosystem during uveal melanoma progression

Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by a small number of recurrent genetic alterations that determine metastatic propensity. BAP1 loss and PRAME expression define the dominant prognostic axes in UM, yet how they promote malignant progression remains unclear. We profiled 190,535 cells from normal uvea, uveal nevus, primary and metastatic UM using single-cell transcriptomics, T cell receptor sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and isogenic perturbation models. Normal melanocytes, nevus cells and UM cells formed a transcriptional continuum marked by loss of differentiation and emergence of neural crest-like, stress-responsive, hypoxic-glycolytic and immune-interacting states. BAP1 loss and PRAME expression imposed distinct but convergent immunoregulatory programs, inducing interferon and TNF-NFkB signaling and MHC-I expression, with HLA-E showing the strongest response. These alterations were accompanied by macrophage and CD8+ T cell remodeling. PRAME-enriched tumor regions formed spatially organized niches enriched for macrophages and plasma cells. These findings define BAP1 loss and PRAME expression as distinct but convergent axes of tumor-immune coevolution and nominate HLA-E as a candidate mediator of immune resistance.

cancer biology↗

A plasma metabolomics workflow for breast cancer detection using quantitative GC/MS and machine learning

Blood-based metabolomic profiling has been widely investigated for breast cancer (BC) detection; however, clinical implementation remains limited due to variability in sample handling, analytical reproducibility, and overfitting during statistical analysis. We established a plasma GC/MS metabolomics workflow for discriminating BC from healthy controls (HC) using conventional machine-learning algorithms. Plasma samples (n = 360; BC = 180, HC = 180) were collected prospectively under standardized preanalytical conditions before surgery and the initiation of systematic anticancer therapy and analyzed using a quantitative GC/MS platform with automated derivatization. Feature selection and model development were conducted using three machine-learning (ML) algorithms (Lasso logistic regression (LR), random forest classifier (RFC), and support vector machine (SVM)). A total of 45 metabolite candidate biomarkers were identified, and the optimal number of metabolite features for each algorithm was estimated by a recursive feature elimination (RFE)-based strategy. The best-performing models achieved area under the ROC curve values (AUC) of 0.910 (LR), 0.893 (RFC), and 0.843 (SVM). We selected prioritizing candidate biomarkers consistently expressed across the multi-algorithm pipeline. A bagging ensemble model improved stability (AUC = 0.911) and reduced false-positive predictions in the independent HC dataset. In addition, model stability with respect to false-positive predictions was assessed using an independent HC cohort (n = 15) that was collected at a separate institution. These results indicate that a plasma metabolomics workflow combined with conventional multi-algorithm ML, algorithm-specific feature selection, and independent assessment provides stable discrimination between BC and HC in a moderately sized cohort.

cancer biology↗

Prognostic value, signal interaction network, and immune infiltration characteristics of MET gene expression in gastric cancer analyzed by multi-database bioinformatics

Objective Based on the bioinformatics method of multi-database integration, this study systematically analyzes the expression characteristics, clinical pathological correlation, prognostic value, potential molecular mechanisms, and immune infiltration patterns of hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) in gastric cancer. Methods The UALCAN and GEPIA databases were employed to examine the differential expression of MET between gastric cancer and normal gastric mucosal tissues, as well as its associations with clinicopathological features. Kaplan-Meier Plotter was utilized to evaluate the impact of MET expression on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed via LinkedOmics, followed by Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of co-expressed genes. Four algorithms, TIMER, CIBERSORT, EPIC, and MCPcounter, were used to cross evaluate the correlation between MET expression and immune cell infiltration; Further validate the cell type specific expression of MET using the gastric cancer single-cell sequencing queues (GSE134520, GSE167297) built into the TISCH database. Results MET expression was significantly elevated in gastric cancer tissues compared with normal gastric mucosa (P < .05), and its expression level was significantly correlated with tumor grade and TNM stage. Patients with high MET expression exhibited significantly poorer OS and PFS than those with low MET expression (P < .05). The PPI network revealed that MET could interact with 20 key proteins, including EGFR, ERBB2, HGF, STAT3, and GRB2 etc. GO enrichment analysis suggests that differentially expressed genes are significantly enriched in functions such as the ERBB signaling pathway, cadherin binding, and DNA repair complexes; KEGG enrichment analysis showed that MET related genes were significantly enriched in pathways such as homologous recombination, nuclear cytoplasmic transport, mismatch repair, and oxidative phosphorylation. Immune infiltration analysis showed that the negative association between MET and B cells infiltration has cross algorithm robustness, while the association with neutrophils, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and macrophages exhibits algorithmic heterogeneity or insignificance; There is no significant correlation between MET and common immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4, etc. Single cell validation further confirmed that MET is mainly enriched in malignant epithelial cells and endothelial cells, and is almost not expressed in immune cells. Conclusions Multidimensional bioinformatic analyses demonstrate that elevated MET expression serves as an independent risk factor for unfavorable prognosis in gastric cancer. MET may mediate dual drug resistance in gastric cancer via crosstalk with multiple signaling molecules (including EGFR, ERBB2, HGF, STAT3 and GRB2) and dysregulation of the homologous recombination repair pathway. Results from multiple-algorithm immune infiltration analysis, single-cell dataset analysis and immune checkpoint correlation analysis indicate that MET exerts only modest direct regulatory effects on the gastric cancer immune microenvironment. This exploratory study offers systematic bioinformatic evidence supporting MET as a candidate prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for gastric cancer. Further functional experiments and prospective cohort studies are required to validate its molecular mechanisms and clinical utility.

cancer biology↗