Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.02.22.529409

Investigating a Gulf Stream Frontal Eddy North of Cape Hatteras: Questioning Overall Impacts on Ecology

Abstract

Ocean physics and biology can interact in myriad and complex ways. Eddies, features found at many scales in the ocean, can drive substantial changes in physical and biogeochemical fields with major implications for marine ecosystems. Mesoscale eddies are challenging to model and difficult to observe synoptically at sea due to their fine-scale variability yet broad extent. In this work we observed a frontal eddy just north of Cape Hatteras via an intensive hydrographic, biogeochemical, and optical sampling campaign. Frontal eddies occur in western boundary currents around the globe and there are major gaps in our understanding of their ecosystem impacts. In the Gulf Stream, frontal eddies have been studied in the South Atlantic Bight, where they are generally assumed to shear apart passing Cape Hatteras. However, we found that the observed frontal eddy had different physical properties and phytoplankton community composition from adjacent water masses, in addition to continued cyclonic rotation. In this work we first synthesize the overall ecological impacts of frontal eddies in a simple conceptual model. This conceptual model led to the hypothesis that frontal eddies could be well timed to supply zooplankton to secondary consumers off Cape Hatteras where there is a notably high concentration and diversity of top predators. Towards testing this hypothesis and our conceptual model we report on the biogeochemical state of this particular eddy connecting physical and biological dynamics, analyze how it differs from Gulf Stream and shelf waters even in "death", and refine our initial model with this new data. Key PointsO_LIIn-depth investigation of a frontal eddy in the Gulf Stream off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina C_LIO_LIContinued physical and biogeochemical differences are observed between the eddy and adjacent water masses even as it begins to shear apart C_LIO_LIWe share a conceptual model of the ecological impact of frontal eddies with a hypothesis that they supply zooplankton to secondary consumers C_LI Plain Language SummaryFrontal eddies are spinning masses of water (~30km in diameter) that move along western boundary currents like the Gulf Stream. When they form they carry productive coastal water into the Gulf Stream and drive upwelling within their cores. Together this leads to an increase in the amount of phytoplankton within them - much higher compared to surrounding nutrient-limited Gulf Stream water. On the east coast of the United States one common area of frontal eddy formation is just off Charleston, SC. Eddies then travel up the coast and dissipate near Cape Hatteras, NC. In this work we measured a wide range of physical and biological properties of a frontal eddy just north of Cape Hatteras. We compared these properties within the eddy to the coastal water on one side and the Gulf Stream water on the other, finding clear differences in phytoplankton community composition and other physical and chemical properties. Using the results of these observations together with previous studies we share a simple model for how frontal eddies may impact phytoplankton, zooplankton, and fish - hypothesizing that they may contribute to the high diversity and density of top predators off Cape Hatteras.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gray, P. C., Gronniger, J., Savelyev, I., Dale, J., Niebergall, A. K., Cassar, N., Windle, A. E., Hunt, D. E., Johnson, Z., Levy, M., Taylor, C., Bourdin, G., Blawas, A., Lohmann, A., Silsbe, G., Johnston, D. W.. 2023-02-23. Investigating a Gulf Stream Frontal Eddy North of Cape Hatteras: Questioning Overall Impacts on Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.22.529409

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Phenotypic variation in divergent mitochondrial haplotypes in migratory three-spined stickleback

Mitochondria are essential components in life-sustaining organismal processes. The mitochondrial genome can be influenced by selection, and divergent mitochondrial haplotypes have substantial potential to affect interspecies variation in life-history and physiology, yet little is known about whole organism phenotypic changes that might accompany mitochondrial genomic divergence. Three-spined stickleback on the Scottish island of North Uist provide a model to study this as their populations exhibit a well-mixed nuclear genome, yet two highly diverged mitochondrial haplotypes ( trans-Atlantic and European). Three-spined stickleback were sampled from six lochs to investigate associations between mitochondrial haplotype and phenotypic traits including organ size, body size, and ovule volume/clutch size, as well as citrate synthase enzyme activity. Results showed that mitochondrial haplotype has an influence on male gonadosomatic index (GSI) and potentially citrate synthase (CS) enzyme activity. Differences in male GSI may be explained by the timing of male spermatogenesis or potentially a need for larger testes in European haplotype fish. While no other phenotypic trait showed differences between mitochondrial haplotypes, there were many differences between sexes and populations e.g. in body size and organ/muscle size.

ecology↗

Gregariousness can promote invasion success of pest insects while higher environmental heterogeneity decreases it

Climate change and environmental homogenization are expected to facilitate the expansion of many forest pest insect species and increase the vulnerability of forest ecosystems to insect outbreaks. At present, we lack empirical data on how the antipredator defence traits of pest insects interact with the local environmental conditions and shape outbreak risk. Here we study this and ask 1) how the antipredator defence strategy of pest insects shapes survival under naturally varying predator community, and 2) how is predation risk shaped by the diversity and structure of forests? We tested these questions by conducting a field predation experiment with artificial prey system (prey items made from edible dough) where we manipulated the gregariousness, unpalatability and defensive colouration of prey and tested their effects on prey survival. Additionally, we measured environmental variables and invertebrate predator community structure along the prey transects to analyse how they shape overall predation risk. Our results show that the predation risk was always lowest for gregarious prey irrespective of other defence strategies. Furthermore, our results indicate that predation pressure was lower in more homogenously structured forest areas or areas with a weak quality deadwood continuum in comparison to locations with more natural state forests and good quality deadwood continuum. Altogether, our results suggest that gregariousness can facilitate pest insects to form outbreaks by increasing their survival against generalist predators. However, by maintaining higher heterogeneity in forests, it is possible to ensure higher predation pressure to regulate their population growth.

ecology↗

Two decades of EU pesticide substitution have not reduced impacts on stream invertebrates

Chemical regulation assumes that withdrawing hazardous substances and replacing them with alternatives reduces environmental harm. We tested this premise within the EU pesticide regulatory framework using a 23-year record of event-driven pesticide exposure and stream-invertebrate communities from 152 German agricultural streams sampled between 1998 and 2021. Neither pesticide toxic pressure nor pesticide-related invertebrate impairment showed a detectable decline over time, and an improvement equivalent to one ecological status class can be excluded. Dominant toxicity drivers shifted from organophosphates to neonicotinoids and subsequently to pyrethroids, yet the relationship between toxic pressure and community effects remained consistent despite their distinct modes of action. Sustained toxic pressure reflected three mechanisms: successive chemical substitution, prolonged approval periods, and continued exposure to substances no longer authorised as plant protection products. Substitution thus changed which chemicals harm streams, not how much. Measured field outcomes must become the benchmark of pesticide regulation.

ecology↗