bioRxiv · 10.1101/2023.01.24.525348
Static and dynamic functional connectomes represent largely similar information
Abstract
Functional connectivity (FC) of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI time series can be estimated using methods that differ in sensitivity to the temporal order of time points (static vs. dynamic) and the number of regions considered in estimating a single edge (bivariate vs. multivariate). Previous research suggests that dynamic FC explains variability in FC fluctuations and behavior beyond static FC. Our aim was to systematically compare methods on both dimensions. We compared five FC methods: Pearsons/full correlation (static, bivariate), lagged correlation (dynamic, bivariate), partial correlation (static, multivariate) and multivariate AR model with and without self-connections (dynamic, multivariate). We compared these methods by (i) assessing similarities between FC matrices, (ii) by comparing node centrality measures, and (iii) by comparing the patterns of brain-behavior associations. Although FC estimates did not differ as a function of sensitivity to temporal order, we observed differences between the multivariate and bivariate FC methods. The dynamic FC estimates were highly correlated with the static FC estimates, especially when comparing group-level FC matrices. Similarly, there were high correlations between the patterns of brain-behavior associations obtained using the dynamic and static FC methods. We conclude that the dynamic FC estimates represent information largely similar to that of the static FC.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Matkovic, A., Anticevic, A., Murray, J. D., Repovs, G.. 2023-01-24. Static and dynamic functional connectomes represent largely similar information. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.525348
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.