Biology subjects

Matkovic, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Matkovic, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

The contribution of diverse and stable functional connectivity edges to brain-behavior associations

Resting-state functional connectivity (FC) has received considerable attention in the study of brain-behavior associations. However, the low generalizability of brain-behavior studies is a common challenge due to the limited sample-to-feature ratio. In this study, we aimed to improve the generalizability of brain-behavior associations in resting-state FC by focusing on diverse and stable edges, i.e., edges that show both high between-subject and low within-subject variability. We used resting-state data from 1003 participants with multiple fMRI sessions from the Human Connectome Project to group FC edges in terms of between-subject and within-subject variability. We found that resting-state FC variability was dominated by stable individual factors. Furthermore, diverse and stable edges were primarily part of heteromodal associative networks, and we showed that diverse stable regions are associated with a domain-general cognitive core. We used canonical correlation analysis (CCA) combined with feature selection and principal component analysis (PCA) to investigate the impact of edge selection on the strength and generalizability of brain-behavior associations. Surprisingly, selection based on edge stability did not significantly affect the results, but diverse edges were more informative than uniform edges in two of the three parcellations tested. Regardless, using all edges resulted in the highest strength and generalizability of canonical correlations. Our simulations suggest that under certain circumstances a combination of feature selection and PCA could improve the generalizability of the results, depending on the sample size and the information value of the features. The lack of improvement in generalizability with selection of stable edges may be due to unreliable estimation of within-subject edge variability or because within-subject edge variability is not related to the information value of the edges for brain-behavior associations. In other words, unstable edges may be equally informative as stable ones.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Static and dynamic functional connectomes represent largely similar information

Functional connectivity (FC) of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI time series can be estimated using methods that differ in sensitivity to the temporal order of time points (static vs. dynamic) and the number of regions considered in estimating a single edge (bivariate vs. multivariate). Previous research suggests that dynamic FC explains variability in FC fluctuations and behavior beyond static FC. Our aim was to systematically compare methods on both dimensions. We compared five FC methods: Pearsons/full correlation (static, bivariate), lagged correlation (dynamic, bivariate), partial correlation (static, multivariate) and multivariate AR model with and without self-connections (dynamic, multivariate). We compared these methods by (i) assessing similarities between FC matrices, (ii) by comparing node centrality measures, and (iii) by comparing the patterns of brain-behavior associations. Although FC estimates did not differ as a function of sensitivity to temporal order, we observed differences between the multivariate and bivariate FC methods. The dynamic FC estimates were highly correlated with the static FC estimates, especially when comparing group-level FC matrices. Similarly, there were high correlations between the patterns of brain-behavior associations obtained using the dynamic and static FC methods. We conclude that the dynamic FC estimates represent information largely similar to that of the static FC.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

QuNex -- An Integrative Platform forReproducible Neuroimaging Analytics

Neuroimaging technology has experienced explosive growth and transformed the study of neural mechanisms across health and disease. However, given the diversity of sophisticated tools for handling neuroimaging data, the field faces challenges in method integration (1-3), particularly across multiple modalities and species. Specifically, researchers often have to rely on siloed approaches which limit reproducibility, with idiosyncratic data organization and limited software interoperability. To address these challenges, we have developed Quantitative Neuroimaging Environment & Toolbox (QuNex), a platform for consistent end-to-end processing and analytics. QuNex provides several novel functionalities for neuroimaging analyses, including a "turnkey" command for the reproducible deployment of custom workflows, from onboarding raw data to generating analytic features. The platform enables inter-operable integration of multi-modal, community-developed neuroimaging software through an extension framework with a software development kit (SDK) for seamless integration of community tools. Critically, it supports high-throughput, parallel processing in high-performance compute environments, either locally or in the cloud. Notably, QuNex has successfully processed over 10,000 scans across neuroimaging consortia (4), including multiple clinical datasets. Moreover, QuNex enables integration of human and non-human workflows via a cohesive translational platform. Collectively, this effort stands to significantly impact neuroimaging method integration across acquisition approaches, pipelines, datasets, computational environments, and species. Building on this platform will enable more rapid, scalable, and reproducible impact of neuroimaging technology across health and disease.

neuroscience↗