Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2022.02.04.479097

Evaluation of Nutritional Potential and Effect of Processing on Improving Nutrient Content of Cassava (Mannihot esculenta crantz) Root and Leaves

Abstract

Cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz) is a major food crop in Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, the Pacific, and South America, where it feeds around 800 million people. Its roots are an excellent source of energy, and its leaves are rich in minerals, vitamins, and protein, which could substantially supplement the current starchy diets if properly detoxified since they contain some toxic anti-nutritional factors. The objective of this study was to provide information on the nutritional profile of cassava root and leaves and role of processing in enhancing and stabilizing their valuable nutrients. Two cassava varieties, kello and qulle, obtained from Areca Agricultural Research Center were used in this study. Roots and leaves were processed (fermented, boiled, and fluid bed dried), and nutritional, anti-nutritional, and functional properties were assessed using AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) standard procedures. As compared to leaves, roots had higher carbohydrate contents, ranging from 81.0 to 87.1 g/100g, whereas leaves had higher protein (21.2 to 28.4g/100g), total carotenoid (234.1 to 987.9 g/g), fiber (16.1 to 22.9 g/100g), Ca (499.8 to 545.4 mg/100g), K (1193.4 to 1211.0 mg/100g), Mg (274.5 to 340.5 mg/100g) and Fe (129.1 to 146.1 mg/kg) contents. Anti-nutritional factors were slightly higher in the leaves than in the roots, with toxic cyanides ranging from 10.1 to 61.0 mg/kg in the leaves and from 1.8 to 47.5 mg/kg in the roots. However, the processing of leaves decreased cyanide content from 61.0 mg/kg to 10.1 mg/kg. Similarly, other anti-nutritional factors, such as condensed tannins, oxalates, and phytate were reduced from 52.0 to 21.0 mg/100g, 156.5 to 25.9 mg/100g, and 35.9 to 4.0 mg/100g), respectively. Hence, the fermentation of leaves and roots followed by boiling and drying is an interesting approach to reduce anti-nutritional factors significantly and ensure their nutritional quality. This study revealed that variety kello had a relatively better nutritional profile than variety qulle, for both root and leaves, except for total carotenoid content, which was higher in the latter. Genetic background and processing methods can greatly affect the nutritional profile of cassava varieties, so it is critical to analyze diverse cassava germplasm and refine the processing method to identify highly nutritious and healthy varieties.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lambebo, T., Deme, T.. 2022-02-04. Evaluation of Nutritional Potential and Effect of Processing on Improving Nutrient Content of Cassava (Mannihot esculenta crantz) Root and Leaves. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.04.479097

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

Promoting Transparent, Fair, and Inclusive Practices in Grantmaking: Lessons from the Open and Equitable Model Funding Program.

The Open Research Funders Group (ORFG) has been instrumental in promoting open and equitable scholarship to enhance academic researchs transparency and accessibility. In 2020, the ORFG formed the Equity & Open Science Working Group, leading to the launch of the Open & Equitable Model Funding Program in 2021. This program aimed to refine grantmaking processes for broader inclusivity and equitable open scholarship practices. The program gathered a cohort of 11 funding organizations and focused on applying various proposed interventions within existing funding programs to improve grantmaking practices. The initiative highlighted the importance of targeted intervention selection and the need for delimited goal-setting, revealing challenges in implementation due to limited resources and the complexity of the processes involved. Participants valued the pilot for its structured approach and opportunities for shared learning despite some facing complexities in fully implementing the interventions. The ORFGs future approach involves flexible intervention selection, effective resource management, and fostering a collaborative community, aiming for a more inclusive and practical application of open scholarship principles.

scientific communication and education↗

Unveiling the Emotional Turmoil: How Covid-19 impacted researchers and the pursuit of emotional well-being in academia.

The Covid-19 crisis unprecedentedly required researchers to adapt to significant changes in their work and personal lives. Our study aims to fill this gap analysing the Covid-19 emotional impact and confinement potential disruptions on researchers activity (specifically, those related to working conditions, caring responsibilities, health, balance, and social support) considering the modulating role played by age, gender, and job position. An online survey was distributed during the first lockdown period of the Covid-19 pandemic, and answers from 1301 researchers (ECR %, senior researchers %) working in Sciences (28.1%), Social Sciences (25.9%), Humanities (16.2%), Health (16.2%) and in Engineering and Architecture (13.5%) were collected. The study highlights that the initial lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic had a significant emotional impact on researchers, exacerbating pre-existing emotional distress and burnout within this group. Factors such as age, health, gender, and difficulties in balancing work and family life were associated with an increased risk of burnout and emotional distress. Lack of social support was identified as a significant risk factor, while the academic culture prioritizing productivity over well-being contributed to the issue. These findings underscore the need for greater support and cultural changes in academia to preserve researchers mental health and prevent the chronicization of mental health issues in young academics.

scientific communication and education↗