Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.03.23.436533

Tick hazard in the South Downs National Park (UK): species, distribution, key locations for future interventions, site density, habitats

Abstract

BackgroundThe South Downs National Park (SDNP) is the UKs most visited National Park, and a foci of tick-borne Lyme disease. A range of human pathogens have been detected in UK ticks and related hosts, and the first presumed autochthonous cases of tick-borne encephalitis and babesiosis were recorded in 2019-20. SDNPs key objectives include conserving wildlife and encouraging enjoyment of the countryside, so interventions are needed that reduce hazard without negatively affecting ecosystem health. To be successful these require knowledge of site hazards, and we aimed to provide this to enable action. MethodsBritish Deer Society volunteers submitted ticks removed from deer. Key potential intervention sites were selected and ticks collected by drag-sampling six 50 m2 transects per site, in most cases twice yearly for two years. Ticks were identified in-lab (sex, life stage, species), hazard measured as tick presence, Density of Ticks (all life stages, DOT), and Density of Nymphs (DON). Sites and habitat types were analysed for association with hazard. Distribution across SDNP was mapped in a Geographic Information System (GIS), by combining and comparing our fieldwork results with records from five other data sources (recent and historic). Results87 Ixodes ricinus (all but one adults, 82%F) were removed from 14 deer (Dama dama n=10; Capreolus capreolus n=3; 1 not recorded; tick burden, 1-35) at 12 locations (commonly woodland). Five potential key intervention sites were identified and drag-sampled 2015-16, collecting 623 ticks (238 on-transects): 53.8% nymphs, 42.5% larvae, 3.7% adults (13M, 10F). Ticks were present on-transects at all sites drag-sampled (I.ricinus at three, Haemaphysalis punctata at two). The Mens (TM, the quietist site for human visitors) had the highest DOT at 30/300 m2 (DON=30/300 m2), followed by Queen Elizabeth Country Park (QECP, the busiest) at 22/300 m2 (12/300 m2), Cowdray Estate (CE) at 8/300 m2 (6/300 m2), and Seven Sisters Country Park (SSCP) at 1/300 m2 (1/300 m2). Ditchling Beacon Nature Reserve (DBNR) was sampled 2016 only (one adult H.punctata collected). Woodland had significantly higher hazard than grazed downland, but ticks were present at all downland sites drag-sampled. GIS mapping showed I.ricinus identified in 33/37 of SDNPs 10 km2 grid squares, Ixodes hexagonus 10/37, H.punctata 7/37, Dermacentor reticulatus 1/37. ConclusionsMapping shows tick hazard is broadly distributed across SDNP. Ixodes ricinuswas most common, though the seeming range expansion of H.punctata is concerning, particularly as it seems to thrive better on grazed downland than I.ricinus. Site specific recommendations include: management of small high hazard plots with heavy visitor numbers (QECP); signage on post-visit precautions (all sites); repellent impregnated clothing for deerstalkers (CE); flock trials to control H.punctata (SSCP, DBNR). Further research at TM, which has high tick density, may contribute to knowledge on ecological dynamics underlying infection density, and the potential use of predator re-introduction/protection as a public health intervention. Ecological research on H.punctata would aid control. The SDNP Authority is ideally placed to link and champion site-based and regional policies to reduce hazard, whilst avoiding or reducing conflict between public health and ecosystem health.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Middleton, J., Cooper, I., Rott, A. S.. 2021-03-24. Tick hazard in the South Downs National Park (UK): species, distribution, key locations for future interventions, site density, habitats. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.436533

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Beyond Single-Metric Assessments: Uncovering Masked Butterfly Declines via Multi-Scalar Analysis in Central Alberta

1. This study analyzed 21 years (2000-2025) of butterfly count data from Central Alberta, integrated with intensive 5-year (2021-2025) high-resolution intra-seasonal sampling. 2. Long-term macro-scale analysis revealed a significant decline in Shannon Diversity, a change that remained obscured when relying solely on traditional metrics of species richness and evenness. 3. This diversity decline was primarily driven by the severe, long-term collapse of the native Common Ringlet (Coenonympha tullia). 4. Four other dominant species--Cabbage White (Pieris rapae), Clouded Sulphur (Colias eriphyle), European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola), and Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala)--maintained long-term population stability, though their abundances were significantly constrained by extreme winter minimum temperatures and rapid spring warming. 5. High-resolution intra-seasonal analysis (2021-2025) demonstrated that community indices and species-specific abundances were strongly limited by daily weather, particularly wind velocity and temperature. 6. These findings illustrate that while traditional metrics like richness and evenness are fundamental to community ecology, they provide incomplete insights when applied in isolation; they are most effective when utilized as part of a complementary, multi-scalar framework. 7. This study highlights the necessity of coupling multi-decadal historical datasets with high-frequency, fine-scale sampling to accurately identify the mechanisms of community turnover that simpler metrics may overlook. 8. The results underscore the critical importance of standardized citizen science monitoring in quantifying environmental impacts and establishing conservation priorities for terrestrial insect groups.

ecology↗

From concentration to export: resource contrasts and bee traits shape pollinator spillover to crops

Floral plantings can either concentrate bees or export them to adjacent crops, yet the ecological conditions influencing these outcomes remain unclear. Here, we develop a mathematical model as proof of concept for our previous integrative hypothesis: concentrator and exporter outcomes can arise as alternative, context-dependent outcomes of the same underlying resource-selection process. Using bees as a model and focusing specifically on spillover from floral plantings to crops, we identified resource-specific thresholds separating concentration- and export-favoring conditions. Our model translates differences in relative patch attractiveness into context-dependent concentration and export outcomes and generates resource-specific, testable predictions about the conditions favoring pollinator movement into crops. In our simulations, the concentrator-exporter transition occurred at a lower flowering-intensity contrast than at pollen or nectar contrasts, which suggests that flowering intensity may provide an initial cue for bee movement, whereas nectar and pollen rewards refine or sustain bee responses once crops are perceived as attractive. Spillover thresholds differed among resource contrasts, whereas response steepness varied across bee-trait and community scenarios. Under the model's trait-sensitivity formulation, predicted spillover probability responded more strongly to flowering contrast for specialists than for generalists; colony size amplified this response, whereas bee richness dampened it. Together, these patterns show how flowering and resource contrasts interact with bee traits and community context to shape predicted spillover. Our results confirm that the concentrator and exporter hypotheses can be understood as context-dependent outcomes of the same ecological process rather than as mutually exclusive alternatives. Experimental tests of the predicted thresholds conducted in the field could reveal when and where floral plantings are most likely to promote bee spillover to crops, potentially supporting crop pollination.

ecology↗

A Computational Re-evaluation of Spatial Trials for Zoonotic Tuberculosis Control: Model Misspecification, Diagnostic Miss-classification, and the Illusion of Wildlife Culling Efficacy

1. Wildlife reservoir management frequently relies on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial's (RBCT) trade-off hypothesis, which posits that reductions in cattle herd infections are offset by a perturbation effect driven by disrupted host dispersal. This paper evaluates the computational and epidemiological robustness of this historical trial, which serves as the foundational empirical experiment guiding zoonotic tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) control policies. 2. Using generalized linear mixed models with a generalized Poisson error distribution to explicitly address historical data overdispersion, this study contrasts traditional parametric inference against exact cluster-constrained permutation tests across distinct operational definitions of disease incidence. 3. Non-parametric diagnostics reveal that previously reported treatment and perturbation effects render as statistical artifacts under exact non-parametric permutation. Inside culling zones, parametric significance fails to withstand exact permutation verification due to extreme data leverage in localized cluster blocks. 4. Crucially, when diagnostic misclassification biases are eliminated by analysing total reactor datasets, all apparent culling effects disappear, and information criteria overwhelmingly favour nested null architectures. Unconfirmed reactors likely represent true biological infections missed by low-sensitivity post-mortem macro-necropsy, proving that host removal tracks observation noise rather than genuine zoonotic transmission pathways. 5. Finally, empirical scaling conducted in this study identifies a novel mathematical saturation effect, demonstrating that this sub-linear scaling is an operational artifact of unmodelled herd-level disease recurrence over time. 6. Policy implications. Because current zoonotic tuberculosis intervention frameworks are built upon a structurally misspecified statistical model, they have driven large-scale veterinary policies resulting in substantial, unevidenced ecological and economic interventions while failing to provide genuine public health, animal health, or disease control benefits.

ecology↗