Bacterial Cytological Profiling Identifies Rhodanine-containing PAINS Analogs as Specific Inhibitors of E. coli Thymidylate Kinase in Vivo

Abstract

In this study, we conducted an activity screen of 31 structural analogs of rhodanine-containing pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS). We identified nine active molecules inhibiting the growth of E. coli and classified them according to their in vivo mechanisms of action. The mechanisms of action of PAINS are generally difficult to identify due to their promiscuity. However, we leveraged bacterial cytological profiling, a fluorescence microscopy technique, to study these complex mechanisms. Ultimately, we found that although some of our molecules promiscuously inhibit multiple cellular pathways, a few molecules specifically inhibit DNA replication despite their structural similarity to related PAINS. A genetic analysis of resistant mutants revealed that thymidylate kinase (an enzyme essential for DNA synthesis) is an intracellular target of some of these rhodanine-containing antibiotics. This finding was supported by assays of in vitro activity as well as experiments utilizing a thymidylate kinase overexpression system. The analog that demonstrated the lowest IC50 in vitro and MIC in vivo displayed the greatest specificity for the inhibition of DNA replication in E. coli, despite containing a rhodamine moiety. While its generally thought that PAINS cannot be developed as antibiotics, this work highlights the utility of bacterial cytological profiling for studying the in vivo specificity of antibiotics, and it showcases novel inhibitors of E. coli thymidylate kinase. ImportanceWe demonstrate that bacterial cytological profiling is a powerful tool for directing antibiotic discovery efforts because it can be used to determine the specificity of an antibiotics in vivo mechanism of action. By assaying analogs of PAINS, molecules that are notoriously intractable and non-specific, we (surprisingly) identify molecules with specific activity against E. coli thymidylate kinase. This suggests that structural modifications to PAINS can confer stronger inhibition by targeting a specific cellular pathway. While in vitro inhibition assays are susceptible to false positive results (especially from PAINS), bacterial cytological profiling provides the resolution to identify molecules with specific in vivo activity.