Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/126938

Last And Corresponding Authorship Practices In Ecology

Abstract

Authorship is intended to convey information regarding credit and responsibility for manuscripts. However, while there is general agreement within ecology that the first author is the person who contributed the most to a particular project, there is less agreement regarding whether being last author is a position of significance and regarding what is indicated by someone being the corresponding author on a manuscript. Using an analysis of papers published in American Naturalist, Ecology, Evolution, and Oikos, I found that: 1) the number of authors on papers is increasing over time; 2) the proportion of first authors as corresponding author has increased over time, as has the proportion of last authors as corresponding author; 3) 84% of papers published in 2016 had the first author as corresponding author; and 4) geographic regions differed in the likelihood of having the first (or last) author as corresponding author. I also carried out an online survey to better understand views on last and corresponding authorship. This survey revealed that most ecologists view the last author as the \"senior\" author on a paper (that is, the person who runs the research group in which most of the work was carried out), and most ecologists view the corresponding author as the person taking full responsibility for a paper. However, there was substantial variation in views on authorship, especially corresponding authorship. Given these results, I suggest that discussions of authorship have as their starting point that the first author will be corresponding author and the senior author will be last author. I also suggest ways of deciding author order in cases where two senior authors contributed equally.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Duffy, M. A.. 2017-04-12. Last And Corresponding Authorship Practices In Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/126938

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Human-caused ignitions and plant invasion drive fire-regime change in a dryland biodiversity hotspot

Dryland ecosystems cover much of Earths terrestrial surface and are increasingly affected by climate warming, land-use change, and biological invasion. The Sonoran Desert of western North America, a biodiversity hotspot that historically experienced infrequent fire, exemplifies how these global-change processes are driving ecosystem transformation through the emergence of novel disturbance regimes. Using records of more than 73,000 wildland fire events, we quantified anthropogenic and environmental controls on fire ignition, size, and spread across the Sonoran Desert. Human-caused ignitions accounted for 95.5% of all recorded fires since the early 1990s and were concentrated near roads, buildings, and other areas of human activity, particularly during late spring. In contrast, lightning-caused ignitions were rare within the Sonoran Desert and occurred primarily in adjacent montane forests during late summer months. Consistent with broader trends across the western United States, fires were typically largest when they ignited far from roads, where access is limited, and fire management often relies on indirect attack strategies. Pre-fire annual and perennial herbaceous vegetation both promoted fire spread, with detectable effects at cover values as low as 5%, while bare ground reduced fuel connectivity and constrained fire growth. Rather than exhibiting a distinct threshold response, fire spread increased linearly with herbaceous cover, suggesting that even modest increases in fine fuels can alter fire behavior in this historically fuel-limited ecosystem. Together, our results illustrate that human ignitions determine where fires occur, whereas herbaceous fuels determine whether those ignitions spread, driving fire-regime transformation across an iconic North American desert. Managing and adapting to this novel fire regime will require coordinated efforts to reduce human-caused ignitions, limit invasive herbaceous fuels, maintain bare-ground interspaces, and rapidly suppress fires. More broadly, our findings identify the mechanisms controlling fire regime change in dryland ecosystems and provide a framework for anticipating ecosystem transformation under ongoing global change.

ecology↗

Hidden infections: Linking parasite ecology, fish health and stakeholder perceptions in Nile tilapia aquaculture in central Kenya

Parasite infections in farmed fish may remain unrecognised when fish-health assessment relies mainly on visible signs. We investigated metazoan parasite occurrence, parasite diversity and community composition, associations between gill-parasite burden and histological alterations, and stakeholder recognition of fish-health problems in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) aquaculture in central Kenya. We examined 157 fish from 20 farms, assessed gill histology in 137 fish, measured water quality once per farm, and collected questionnaire and interview data from 48 stakeholders. Five metazoan parasite groups were recorded, with monopisthocotylans the most prevalent (36.3%). Higher monopisthocotylan burden was associated with a greater cumulative number of gill lesion types (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.43-2.42, p < 0.001), whereas copepod burden was not. Parasite diversity was higher in the larger operational pond category across all three Hill-number orders (p = 0.006-0.008), and parasite-community composition differed between categories (PERMANOVA, p = 0.034), although these comparisons were exploratory because only four farms were in the larger category and farm category overlapped with county. Single-time-point water-quality measurements showed no clear associations with parasite burden, diversity or community composition after multiple-testing correction. Farmers and fisheries or extension officers recognised signs of poor fish health but rarely identified parasites as a specific cause, and routine diagnostic confirmation was uncommon. The findings reveal a gap between laboratory detection of parasite-associated gill alterations and farm-level recognition and diagnosis.

ecology↗

Habitat degradation destabilizes complex metacommunities by disrupting dispersal

Habitat loss and fragmentation are rapidly reshaping ecosystems worldwide, yet their consequences for ecological stability remain unresolved. Classical theory, pioneered by Robert May, established rigorous criteria for stability; however, these apply to spatially well-mixed communities, limiting their relevance to habitat degradation. Here, we develop a metacommunity framework that integrates classical stability theory with spatial dynamics to determine how anthropogenic habitat degradation reshapes ecosystem stability. We show that metacommunities exhibit three distinct dynamical regimes following a perturbation (e.g., drought or forest fire): stable regime (perturbations decay and species persist), reactive regime (perturbations are transiently amplified, which increases extinction risk under repeated disturbances), and unstable regime (perturbations grow, causing extinctions even after a single disturbance). Dispersal fundamentally reshapes these stability transitions, converting unstable communities into reactive ones and reactive communities into stable ones. While homogeneous dispersal progressively stabilizes communities, heterogeneous dispersal maximizes stability at intermediate strengths. We further show that habitat loss and fragmentation can be comparably effective at driving species extinctions by shifting metacommunities from stable to reactive and ultimately unstable regimes, demonstrating that fragmentation per se can be as important as habitat loss. Our findings reveal that reactivity is both an early-warning signal of impending instability and a state of elevated extinction risk under recurrent disturbances. By linking stability transitions to changes in population persistence under nonlinear dynamics, our results bridge classical stability theory with spatial ecology and provide a general framework for predicting how ecological complexity and dispersal jointly govern both ecosystem stability and population persistence under habitat degradation.

ecology↗