Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Duffy, M. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Duffy, M. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Storage length and temperature influence infectivity and spore yield of two common Daphnia parasites

Daphnia and their parasites have emerged as a model system for understanding the ecology and evolution of infectious diseases. Two of the most commonly studied Daphnia parasites are the bacterium Pasteuria ramosa and the fungus Metschnikowia bicuspidata. In addition to being the focus of numerous field studies, these two parasites have been used in many laboratory experiments. However, there is little information in the scientific literature about how the conditions under which these parasites are stored influence the infectivity and yield of transmission stages (\"spores\"). This is problematic because such information is critical for experiment design and data interpretation.\n\nWe tested the influence of storage length (eight treatments ranging from 1 day to 1 year) and temperature (-20{degrees}C (freezer) vs. 4{degrees}C (refrigerator)) on spore infectivity and yield. We found that Pasteuria spores survived well at both -20{degrees}C and 4{degrees}C, and remained infective even after storage for one year. However, Pasteuria spore yields dropped over time, particularly at 4{degrees}C. In contrast, Metschnikowia spores were killed within days at -20{degrees}C. At 4{degrees}C, Metschnikowia infectivity declined steadily over a period of two months and, by four months, spores were no longer infective. Spore yield from Metschnikowia-infected hosts was not significantly impacted by storage length, but trended downwards.\n\nScientists working with Pasteuria should be aware that spore yield declines during storage, particularly in the refrigerator. Scientists working with Metschnikowia should be aware that it is killed by freezer storage and that, even if it is stored in the refrigerator, infectivity declines within a few months. These results might have implications for parasite distributions in the field; for example, the high sensitivity of Metschnikowia to freezing might help explain why it tends to be more common in deep lakes than in ponds or rock pools.

epidemiology

Last And Corresponding Authorship Practices In Ecology

Authorship is intended to convey information regarding credit and responsibility for manuscripts. However, while there is general agreement within ecology that the first author is the person who contributed the most to a particular project, there is less agreement regarding whether being last author is a position of significance and regarding what is indicated by someone being the corresponding author on a manuscript. Using an analysis of papers published in American Naturalist, Ecology, Evolution, and Oikos, I found that: 1) the number of authors on papers is increasing over time; 2) the proportion of first authors as corresponding author has increased over time, as has the proportion of last authors as corresponding author; 3) 84% of papers published in 2016 had the first author as corresponding author; and 4) geographic regions differed in the likelihood of having the first (or last) author as corresponding author. I also carried out an online survey to better understand views on last and corresponding authorship. This survey revealed that most ecologists view the last author as the \"senior\" author on a paper (that is, the person who runs the research group in which most of the work was carried out), and most ecologists view the corresponding author as the person taking full responsibility for a paper. However, there was substantial variation in views on authorship, especially corresponding authorship. Given these results, I suggest that discussions of authorship have as their starting point that the first author will be corresponding author and the senior author will be last author. I also suggest ways of deciding author order in cases where two senior authors contributed equally.

ecology