Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Zuhlsdorff, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Zuhlsdorff, K..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Neurobehavioural correlates of changing one's mind in ADHD and OCD

Cognitive flexibility is an executive function that allows individuals to adjust behaviour in response to changing environmental demands. We assessed volitional switching under uncertainty, without rule-based learning, in the Change Your Mind task. Nineteen patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), 19 patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and matched control participants (20 per group) completed the task whilst undergoing a functional MRI scan. The task was a two-alternative forced choice paradigm where each stimulus was presented twice successively, with spurious feedback following the first presentation. This allowed participants the opportunity to repeat or change their response. Participants with ADHD changed their response more frequently than controls following a previously correct response, associated with reduced accuracy on the second trial. This was accompanied with smaller differences between change and repeat trials in the superior frontal gyrus, paracingulate gyrus and frontal pole compared to controls. Participants with OCD did not differ from healthy controls in their performance but exhibited greater activity on both change and repeat trials in the pre- and postcentral gyri than controls. These results point to distinct neurobehavioural differences in patients with ADHD and OCD underlying what is often termed more broadly inflexible behaviour.

neuroscience↗

Impacts and interactions of stress, noradrenaline and serotonin signalling on probabilistic reversal learning

RationaleEarly life stress (ELS) is acknowledged to underlie cognitive and emotional abnormalities linked to stress-related mood disorders. ELS can lead to persistent biases in how uncertain feedback is processed to affect the flexibility of decision-making. Objectives(1) To investigate the effects of ELS on the flexibility of rats trained on a serial probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task involving spurious positive and negative feedback. (2) To elucidate the involvement of the stress hormone corticosterone and the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems in modulating how ELS affects PRL. MethodsMale and female rats were intermittently separated from maternal care on postnatal days five to nineteen, inclusively. As adults, the same rats were trained on a deterministic reversal learning task involving certain rewarded or non-rewarded outcomes followed by a PRL task where correct and incorrect responses were rewarded on 80% and 20% of trials, respectively. Dose-dependent effects of the beta-blocker, propranolol, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, citalopram and corticosterone were subsequently determined. ResultsELS resulted in an increased responsivity to feedback, specifically in males making more win-stay responses following a reward, that was associated with an increased punishment learning rate. In both control and MS rats, propranolol increased feedback sensitivity, but delayed updating following a rule switch. In contrast, neither citalopram nor corticosterone significantly affected reversal learning. ConclusionsELS is sufficient to cause persistent changes in how feedback is processed by male rats on a reversal learning task. Activation of beta-adrenergic receptors may be necessary for updating learned associations during decision-making involving uncertain feedback.

neuroscience↗

5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C receptor antagonism differentially modulates reinforcement learning and cognitive flexibility: behavioral and computational evidence

Cognitive flexibility, the ability to adapt behavior in response to a changing environment, is disrupted in several neuropsychiatric disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Evidence suggests that flexibility, which can be operationalized using reversal learning tasks, is modulated by serotonergic transmission. However, how exactly flexible behavior and associated reinforcement learning (RL) processes are modulated by 5-HT action on specific receptors is unknown. We investigated the effects of 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR) and 5-HT2C receptor (5-HT2CR) antagonism on cognitive flexibility and underlying RL mechanisms. Thirty-six male Lister hooded rats were trained on a touchscreen visual discrimination and reversal task. We evaluated the effects of systemic treatments with the 5-HT2AR and 5-HT2CR antagonists M100907 and SB-242084, respectively, on reversal learning performance and performance on probe trials where correct and incorrect stimuli were presented with a third, probabilistically rewarded, stimulus. Computational models were fitted to task choice data to extract RL parameters, including a novel model designed specifically for this task. 5-HT2AR antagonism impaired reversal learning during certain phases. 5-HT2CR antagonism, on the other hand, impaired learning from positive feedback. RL models further differentiated these effects. 5-HT2AR antagonism decreased punishment learning rate at high and low doses. The low dose also increased exploration (beta) and increased stimulus and side stickiness (kappa). 5-HT2CR antagonism also increased beta, but reduced side stickiness. These data indicate that 5-HT2A and 5-HT2CRs both modulate different aspects of flexibility, with 5-HT2ARs modulating learning from negative feedback and 5-HT2cRs for learning from positive feedback.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Computational modeling of reinforcement learning and functional neuroimaging of probabilistic reversal dissociates compulsive behaviors in Gambling and Cocaine Use Disorders

Cognitive flexibility refers to the ability to adjust to changes in the environment and is essential for adaptive behavior. It can be investigated using laboratory tests such as probabilistic reversal learning (PRL). In individuals with both Cocaine Use Disorder (CUD) and Gambling Disorder (GD), overall impairments in PRL flexibility are observed. However, it is poorly understood whether this impairment depends on the same brain mechanisms in cocaine and gambling addictions. Reinforcement learning (RL) is the process by which rewarding or punishing feedback from the environment is used to adjust behavior, to maximise reward and minimise punishment. Using RL models, a deeper mechanistic explanation of the latent processes underlying cognitive flexibility can be gained. Here, we report results from a re-analysis of PRL data from control participants (n=18) and individuals with either GD (n=18) or CUD (n=20) using a hierarchical Bayesian RL approach. We observed significantly reduced stimulus stickiness (i.e., stimulus-bound perseveration) in GD, which may reflect increased exploratory behavior that is insensitive to outcomes. RL parameters were unaffected in CUD. We relate the behavioral findings to their underlying neural substrates through an analysis of task-based fMRI data. We report differences in tracking reward and punishment expected values (EV) in individuals with GD compared to controls, with greater activity during reward EV tracking in the cingulate gyrus and amygdala. In CUD, we observed reduced responses to positive punishment prediction errors (PPE) and increased activity following negative PPEs in the superior frontal gyrus compared to controls. Thus, an RL framework serves to differentiate behavior in a probabilistic learning paradigm in two compulsive disorders, GD and CUD.

neuroscience↗

Neurobehavioral precursors of compulsive cocaine-seeking in dual fronto-striatal circuits

Only some individuals using drugs recreationally eventually become addicted, and persist in drug seeking and taking despite adverse consequences. The neurobehavioral determinants of this individual vulnerability have not been fully elucidated. We report that in drug naive rats the future tendency to develop compulsive cocaine seeking is characterised by behavioral stickiness-related functional hypoconnectivity between the prefrontal cortex and posterior dorsomedial striatum in combination with impulsivity-related structural alterations in the infralimbic cortex, anterior insula and nucleus accumbens. These findings show that the vulnerability to develop compulsive cocaine seeking behavior stems from pre-existing structural or functional changes in two distinct cortico-striatal systems that underlie deficits in impulse control and goal-directed behavior.

neuroscience↗