Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Treeby, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Treeby, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Impact of acoustic property uncertainty on transcranial ultrasound simulation

Subject-specific simulations of wave propagation are commonly used to plan and report acoustic and thermal exposure during transcranial ultrasound (TUS) interventions. Their accuracy depends on acoustic and thermal tissue property assumptions, including sound speed, density, and attenuation. Reported property measurements vary widely across the literature, precluding consensus point estimates for simulation. How this property uncertainty affects estimated exposure has not been quantified. We compile literature-based bounds for seven acoustic and thermal properties of skull and brain tissue and assess their individual impact on simulated intensity and temperature rise using two independent simulation platforms (PRESTUS/k-Wave and BabelBrain). Variations in skull attenuation and absorption produced the largest outcome uncertainty: peak intensity in the brain varied roughly threefold across the reported range of skull attenuation alone, while absorption most strongly affected temperature rise within the skull. The direction of each parameter's effect was consistent across platforms and, with one exception, across skull thickness. This allowed bounds to be combined into setups that bracket transmission and temperature rise. Compared to these extremes, default property sets of three simulation toolboxes (k-Plan, BabelBrain, PRESTUS) yielded similar brain intensity but divergent skull heating, driven mainly by differing assumptions on skull absorption and heat capacity. These results indicate that uncertainty in skull acoustic properties is a major source of variability in TUS exposure estimates, and that refined measurements of these properties, together with explicit reporting of exposure uncertainty, are needed to support safe, effective, and reproducible transcranial ultrasound planning.

neuroscience↗

Ramped V1 transcranial ultrasonic stimulation modulates but does not evoke visual evoked potentials

Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS), has been shown to evoke visual evoked potential (VEP)-like potentials on EEG recordings, and also to modulate sensory evoked potentials. However, pulsed TUS is accompanied by an auditory confound, and it is possible that any observed effects were, in-part, evoked by this confound. Therefore, we used ramped TUS pulses, which are not as easily audible, to examine whether primary visual cortex (V1) TUS evokes VEP-like potentials, and modulates VEPs elicited using a checkerboard stimulus. MethodsWe tested 14 healthy participants (31 {+/-} 4.3 yrs, 4 F and 10 M). TUS was applied to the left V1 using a 270 kHz transducer (H115-2AA, Sonic Concepts). Ramped pulses (1 ms ramp, 3.25 ms total pulse duration) were repeated at 250 Hz, with a pulse train duration of 300 ms, an effective duty cycle of 50%, and Isppa without ramping of 16 W/cm2 in water. EEG was recorded from 16 channels using the g.USBamp amplifier (g.tec medical engineering GmbH). In two blocks (TUS-only), real and sham (100 each) TUS trials were repeated every 2 s. In another two blocks (TUS+checkerboard), a checkerboard stimulus was flipped every 0.5 s, and every fourth stimulus was associated with either a real or sham (100 each) TUS trial. The TUS trial started approx. 130 ms (0-5 ms jitter) before the checkerboard flip. All EEG data were analysed using Fieldtrip, and cluster-based permutation tests were used to test for differences between conditions. Results and discussionIn the TUS-only condition, in contrast to a previous study, we found no evoked potentials using ramped pulses which minimised the auditory artifact. In the TUS+checkerboard condition, we observed a modulation of the early-component of the VEP in real TUS, relative to no TUS trials. This suggests that, in line with in-vitro and animal data, there is a direct neuromodulatory effect of ultrasound, in addition to any confounding effects. Moving forward, ramping offers a relatively easy approach to minimise the auditory confound.

neuroscience↗