Biology subjects

Spildooren, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Spildooren, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Limited effects of age on the use of the ankle and counter-rotation mechanism in the sagittal plane

Two mechanisms can be used to accelerate the center of mass (CoM) to control the CoM in relation to the base of support during standing. The first is applying ankle moments to shift the center of pressure (CoP), which has been coined the "CoP mechanism". The second is changing the angular momentum around the CoM to change the direction of the ground reaction force, i.e., the "counter-rotation mechanism". At both the beginning and the end of the lifespan, problems with postural control are common. In this study, we asessed anteroposterior balance performance and the related use of these postural control mechanisms in children, younger adults, and older adults. Sixteen pre-pubertal children (6-9y), 17 younger adults (18-24y) and eight older adults (65-80y) performed bipedal upright standing trials of 16 seconds on a rigid surface and on three balance boards that could freely move in the sagittal plane, varying in height (15-19 cm) of the board above the point of contact with the floor. Full body kinematics were measured. Performance related outcome measures, i.e., the number of trials with balance loss and the Root Mean Square (RMS) of the time series of the CoM acceleration were calculated. Additionally, the RMS of the time series of the CoM acceleration due to the CoP and counter-rotation mechanism and the contributions of the CoP and the counter-rotation mechanism to the CoM acceleration (in %) in the sagittal plane were calculated. Furthermore, selected kinematic measures, i.e., the orientation of the board and the head and the Mean Power Frequency of balance board orientation and of CoM acceleration were calculated. Compared to younger adults, children and older adults showed a poorer balance performance, reflected by a greater RMS of CoM accelerations and more balance loss in older adults. Across age groups and conditions, the contribution of the CoP mechanism to the total CoM acceleration was dominant, i.e., 95%-108%. The contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism ranged between 19%-31% (with totals higher than 100% indicating opposite effects of both mechanisms). We suggest that the contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism is limited, since the counter-rotation mechanism would conflict with stabilizing the orientation of the head in space. Furthermore, children did use the counter-rotation mechanism relatively more to accelerate the CoM compared to younger adults. Possibly this reflects that they are still learning to limit the contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism to the same extent as adults.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2021

The effect of constraining mediolateral ankle moments and foot placement on the use of the counter-rotation mechanism during walking

Stability during walking can be maintained by shifts of the Center of Pressure through modulation of foot placement and ankle moments (CoP-mechanism). An additional mechanism to stabilize gait, is the counter-rotation mechanism i.e. changing the angular momentum of segments around the Center of Mass (CoM) to change the direction of the ground reaction force. It is unknown if and how humans use the counter-rotation mechanism to control the CoM during walking and how this interacts with the CoP-mechanism. Thirteen healthy adults walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematic and force plate data were obtained. The contributions of the CoP and the counter-rotation mechanisms to control the CoM were calculated during steady-state walking, walking on LesSchuh, i.e. constraining mediolateral CoP shifts underneath the stance foot and walking on LesSchuh at 50% of normal step width, constraining both foot placement and ankle mechanisms (LesSchuh50%). A decreased magnitude of within-stride control by the CoP-mechanism was compensated for by an increased magnitude of within-stride control by the counter-rotation mechanism during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. This suggests that the counter-rotation mechanism is used to stabilize gait when needed. However, the mean contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism over strides did not increase during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. The CoP-mechanism was the main contributor to the total CoM acceleration. The use of the counter-rotation mechanism may be limited because angular accelerations ultimately need to be reversed and because of interference with other task constraints, such as head stabilization and preventing interference with the gait pattern.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2021

Effects of age and surface instability on the control of the center of mass

During standing, posture can be controlled by accelerating the Center of Mass (CoM) through shifting the center of pressure (CoP) within the base of support by applying ankle moments ("CoP mechanism"), or through the "counter-rotation mechanism", i.e., changing the angular momentum of segments around the CoM to change the direction of the ground reaction force. Postural control develops over the lifespan; at both the beginning and the end of the lifespan adequate postural control appears more challenging. In this study, we aimed to assess mediolateral balance performance and the related use of the postural control mechanisms in children, older adults and young adults when standing on different (unstable) surfaces. Sixteen pre-pubertal children (6-9y), 17 young adults (18-24y) and eight older adults (65-80y) performed bipedal upright standing trials of 16 seconds on a rigid surface and on three balance boards that could freely move in the frontal plane, varying in height (15-19 cm) of the surface of the board above the point of contact with the floor. Full body kinematics (16 segments, 48 markers, using SIMI 3D-motion analysis system (GmbH) and DeepLabCut and Anipose) were retrieved. Performance related outcome measures, i.e., the number of trials with balance loss and the Root Mean Square (RMS) of the time series of the CoM acceleration, the contributions of the CoP mechanism and the counter-rotation mechanism to the CoM acceleration in the frontal plane and selected kinematic measures, i.e. the orientation of the board and the head and the Mean Power Frequency (MPF) of the balance board orientation and the CoM acceleration were determined. Balance loss only occurred when standing on the highest balance board, twice in one older adult once in one young adult. In children and older adults, the RMS of the CoM accelerations were larger, corresponding to poorer balance performance. Across age groups and conditions, the contribution of the CoP mechanism to the total CoM acceleration was much larger than that of the counter-rotation mechanisms, ranging from 94%-113% vs 23%-38% (with totals higher than 100% indicating opposite effects of both mechanisms). Deviations in head orientation were small compared to deviations in balance board orientation. We hypothesize that the CoP mechanism is dominant, since the counter-rotation mechanism would conflict with stabilizing the orientation of the head in space.

bioengineering↗