Biology subjects

Matheson, G. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Matheson, G. J..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Dopamine D1 receptor availability is not associated with delusional ideation measures of psychosis proneness

The dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) is thought to play a role in psychosis and schizophrenia, however the exact nature of this involvement is not clear. Positron emission tomography studies comparing D1R between patients and control subjects have produced inconsistent results. An important confounding factor in most clinical studies is previous exposure to antipsychotic treatment, which is thought to influence the density of D1R. To circumvent some of the limitations of clinical studies, an alternative approach for studying the relationship between D1R and psychosis is to examine individuals at increased risk for psychotic disorders, or variation in subclinical psychotic symptoms such as delusional ideation within the general population, referred to as psychosis proneness traits. In this study, we investigated whether D1R availability is associated with delusional ideation in healthy controls using data from 76 individuals measured with PET using [11C]SCH23390 and 217 individuals who completed delusional ideation questionnaires, belonging to three different study cohorts. We first performed exploratory, hypothesis-generating, analyses by creating and evaluating a new measure of delusional ideation (n=132 and n=27), which was then found to show a negative association with D1R availability (n=24). Next, we performed confirmatory analyses using Bayesian statistical modelling, in which we first attempted to replicate this result (n=20), and then evaluated the association of Peters Delusion Inventory scores with D1R availability in two independent cohorts (n=41 and 20). Collectively, we found strong evidence that there is little to no linear association between delusional ideation and D1R availability in healthy controls. If differences in D1R can be confirmed in drug-naive schizophrenia patients compared to controls, further studies are needed to ascertain whether these changes occur at the onset of psychotic symptoms or if they are associated with specific behavioural or genetic aspects of psychosis proneness other than delusional ideation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of (R)-PK11195 outcome measures without arterial input function

BackgroundThe positron emission tomography radioligand (R)-[11C]PK11195 can be used to quantify the expression of translocator protein (TSPO), which is considered a marker for activation of glial cells. TSPO is expressed throughout the brain, and for this reason no true reference region exists. When a radioligand does not have a reference region, an arterial input function (AIF) is usually required in order to quantify binding. However, obtaining an AIF can be difficult as well as uncomfortable for participants. Alternative methods have therefore been proposed with the aim of estimating (R)-[11C]PK11195 binding without arterial measurements, such as standardized uptake values (SUVs), supervised-cluster analysis (SVCA), or the use of a pseudo-reference region. The objective of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of these techniques.\n\nMethodsData from a previously published (R)-[11C]PK11195 test-retest study in six healthy male subjects were reanalysed. Non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) was calculated for a set of cortical and subcortical brain regions using the simplified reference tissue model, with either cerebellum as reference region or a reference input derived using SVCA. SUVs were estimated for the time interval of 40-60 minutes. For comparison, total distribution volume (VT), specific distribution volume (VS) and BPND were estimated from the two-tissue-compartment model (2TCM) using AIF. Test-retest reliability was then assessed for all outcome measures. Convergent validity was examined by correlating all measures derived without an AIF to those derived using 2TCM.\n\nResultsTest-retest reliability for BPND estimates were poor (80% of all regional ICCs<0.5). SUVs showed, on average, moderate reliability. BPND estimates derived without an AIF were not correlated with VT, VS or BPND from the 2TCM (all R2<12%). SUVs were not correlated with any other outcome (all R2<9%).\n\nDiscussionBPND estimated using cerebellum or SVCA as reference input showed poor reliability and little to no convergent validity with outcomes derived using an AIF. SUVs showed moderate reliability but no convergent validity with any other outcome. Caution is warranted for interpreting patient-control comparisons employing (R)-[11C]PK11195 outcome measures obtained without an AIF.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

We need to talk about reliability: Making better use of test retest studies for study design and interpretation

Positron emission tomography (PET), along with many other fields of clinical research, is both timeconsuming and expensive, and recruitable patients can be scarce. These constraints limit the possibility of large-sample experimental designs, and often lead to statistically underpowered studies. This problem is exacerbated by the use of outcome measures whose accuracy is sometimes insufficient to answer the scientific questions posed. Reliability is usually assessed in validation studies using healthy participants, however these results are often not easily applicable to clinical studies examining different populations. I present a new method and tools for using summary statistics from previously published test-retest studies to approximate the reliability of outcomes in new samples. In this way, the feasibility of a new study can be assessed during planning stages, and before collecting any new data. An R package called relfeas also accompanies this article for performing these calculations. In summary, these methods and tools will allow researchers to avoid performing costly studies which are, by virtue of their design, unlikely to yield informative conclusions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

PET studies of the glial cell marker TSPO in psychosis patients - a meta-analysis using individual participant data

BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests that the immune system may be an important target for new treatment approaches in schizophrenia. Positron emission tomography (PET) and radioligands binding to the translocator protein (TSPO), which is expressed in glial cells in brain including immune cells, represents a potential method for patient stratification and treatment monitoring. This study examined if patients with first episode psychosis and schizophrenia had altered TSPO levels as compared to healthy control subjects.\n\nMethodsPubMed was searched for studies comparing patients with psychosis to healthy controls using second-generation TSPO radioligands. The outcome measure was distribution volume (VT), an index of TSPO levels, in frontal cortex (FC), temporal cortex (TC) and hippocampus (HIP). Bayes factors (BF) were applied to examine the relative support for higher, lower or no-change of TSPO levels in patients as compared to healthy controls.\n\nResultsFive studies, with 75 patients with first-episode psychosis or schizophrenia and 77 healthy control subjects were included. BF showed strong support for lower patient VT relative to no-change (all BF>32) or relative to an increase (all BF>422) in all brain regions. From the posterior distributions, mean patient-control differences in standardized VT values were -0.48 for FC (95% credible interval (CredInt)=-0.88 to -0.09), -0.47 for TC (CredInt=-0.87 to -0.07) and -0.63 for HIP (CredInt=-1.00 to -0.25).\n\nDiscussionThe observed reduction of TPSO in compared to control subjects in patients may correspond to altered function or lower density of brain immune cells. Future studies should focus on investigating the underlying biological mechanisms and their relevance for treatment.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2017

Serotonin 5-HT1A receptor binding and self-transcendence in healthy control subjects - a replication study using Bayesian hypothesis testing

ObjectiveA putative relationship between markers for the serotonin system and the personality scale self-transcendence (ST) and its subscale spiritual acceptance (SA) has been demonstrated in a previous PET study of 5-HT1A receptor binding in healthy control subjects. The results could however not be replicated in a subsequent PET study at an independent centre. In this study, we performed a replication of our original study in a larger sample using Bayesian hypothesis testing to evaluate relative evidence both for and against this hypothesis.\n\nMethodsRegional 5-HT1A receptor binding potential (BPND) was examined in 50 healthy male subjects using PET with the radioligand [11C]WAY100635. 5-HT1A availability was calculated using the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) yielding regional BPND. ST and SA were measured using the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) questionnaire. Correlations between ST/SA scores and 5-HT1A BPND in frontal cortex, hippocampus and raphe nuclei were examined by calculation of default correlation Bayes factors (BFs) and replication BFs.\n\nResultsThere were no significant correlations between 5-HT1A receptor binding and ST/SA scores. Rather, five of six replication BFs provided moderate to strong evidence for no association between 5-HT1A availability and ST/SA, while the remaining BF provided only weak evidence.\n\nConclusionWe could not replicate our previous findings of an association between 5-HT1A availability and the personality trait ST/SA. Rather, the Bayesian analysis provided evidence for a lack of correlation. Further research should focus on whether other components of the serotonin system may be related to ST or SA. This study also illustrates how Bayesian hypothesis testing allows for greater flexibility and more informative conclusions than traditional p-values, suggesting that this approach may be advantageous for analysis of molecular imaging data.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Is dopamine D1 receptor availability related to social behavior? A positron emission tomography replication study

BackgroundAssociations between dopamine receptor levels and pro- and antisocial behavior have previously been demonstrated in human subjects using positron emission tomography (PET) and self-rated measures of personality traits. So far, only one study has focused on the D1-dopamine receptor (D1-R), [fi]nding a positive correlation with the trait social desirability, which is characterized by low dominant and high af[fi]liative behavior, while physical aggression showed a negative correlation. The aim of the present study was to replicate these previous [fi]ndings using a new independent sample of subjects.\n\nMethodsTwenty-six healthy males were examined with the radioligand [11C]SCH-23390, and completed the Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP) which includes measures of social desirability and physical trait aggression. The simpli[fi]ed reference tissue model with cerebellum as reference region was used to calculate BPND values in the whole striatum and limbic striatum. The two regions were selected since they showed strong association between D1-R availability and personality scores in the previous study. Pearsons correlation coef[fi]cients and replication Bayes factors were then employed to assess the replicability and robustness of previous results.\n\nResultsThere were no signi[fi]cant correlations (all p values > 0.3) between regional BPND values and personality scale scores. Replication Bayes factors showed strong to moderate evidence in favor no relationship between D1-receptor availability and social desirability (striatum BF01 = 12.4; limbic striatum BF01 = 7.2) or physical aggression scale scores (limbic striatum BF01 = 3.3), compared to the original correlations.\n\nDiscussionWe could not replicate the previous [fi]ndings of associations between D1-R availability and either pro- or antisocial behavior as measured using the SSP. Rather, there was evidence in favor of failed replications of associations between BPND and scale scores. Potential reasons for these results are restrictive variance in both PET and personality outcomes due to high sample homogeneity, or that the previous [fi]ndings were false positives.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

The Readability Of Scientific Texts Is DecreasingOver Time

Clarity and accuracy of reporting are fundamental to the scientific process. The understandability of written language can be estimated using readability formulae. Here, in a corpus consisting of 707 452 scientific abstracts published between 1881 and 2015 from 122 influential biomedical journals, we show that the readability of science is steadily decreasing. Further, we demonstrate that this trend is indicative of a growing usage of general scientific jargon. These results are concerning for scientists and for the wider public, as they impact both the reproducibility and accessibility of research findings.

scientific communication and education↗