Biology subjects

Liebold, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Liebold, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

CyChat: a conversational Cytoscape app for no-code, reproducible network analysis

Network-based analyses of molecular interactions are useful for interpreting high-throughput omics data and identifying therapeutic targets. Cytoscape is the standard platform for these tasks, but users face a trade-off between accessible graphical workflows that are difficult to document and reproducible automation in Python or R that requires programming expertise. General-purpose coding assistants can generate Cytoscape Automation scripts, but remain external to Cytoscape. We present CyChat, a Cytoscape Desktop app that integrates a chat interface and a large language model (LLM) agent into the application. CyChat translates natural language into executable Cytoscape Automation workflows, runs generated Python code, and exports chat sessions with executed code as standalone Jupyter notebooks. To reduce setup barriers, CyChat includes an embedded Python runtime and supports both cloud-based and locally hosted LLMs. CyChat was evaluated across ten Cytoscape workflows using seven LLM providers, each represented by one LLM. The strongest configuration achieves a pass rate above 99%. In a qualitative evaluation based on a published network visualization, CyChat completes the task in 1.5-5 minutes, compared with 15-20 minutes for manual GUI workflows by computational biologists. CyChat is available through the Cytoscape App Store at https://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/cychat.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

Transcription factor prediction using protein 3D structures

MotivationTranscription factors (TFs) are DNA-binding proteins that regulate gene expression. Traditional methods predict a protein as a TF if the protein contains any DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of known TFs. However, this approach fails to identify a novel TF that does not contain any known DBDs. Recently proposed TF prediction methods do not rely on DBDs. Such methods use features of protein sequences to train a machine learning model, and then use the trained model to predict whether a protein is a TF or not. Because the 3-dimensional (3D) structure of a protein captures more information than its sequence, using 3D protein structures will likely allow for more accurate prediction of novel TFs. ResultsWe propose a deep learning-based TF prediction method (StrucTFactor), which is the first method to utilize 3D secondary structural information of proteins. We compare StrucTFactor with recent state-of-the-art TF prediction methods based on[~] 525 000 proteins across 12 datasets, capturing different aspects of data bias (including sequence redundancy) possibly influencing a methods performance. We find that StrucTFactor significantly (p-value < 0.001) outperforms the existing TF prediction methods, improving the performance over its closest competitor by up to 17% based on Matthews correlation coefficient. AvailabilityData and source code are available at https://github.com/lieboldj/StrucTFactor and on our website at https://apps.cosy.bio/StrucTFactor/ Contactkhalique.newaz@uni-hamburg.de Supplementary informationIncluded

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

The power and limits of predicting exon-exon interactions using protein 3D structures

Alternative splicing (AS) effects on cellular functions can be captured by studying changes in the underlying protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Because AS results in the gain or loss of exons, existing methods for predicting AS-related PPI changes utilize known PPI interfacing exon-exon interactions (EEIs), which only cover [~]5% of known human PPIs. Hence, there is a need to extend the existing limited EEI knowledge to advance the functional understanding of AS. In this study, we explore whether existing computational PPI interface prediction (PPIIP) methods, originally designed to predict residue-residue interactions (RRIs), can be used to predict EEIs. We evaluate three recent state-of-the-art PPIIP methods for the RRI- as well as EEI-prediction tasks using known protein complex structures, covering [~]230,000 RRIs and [~]27,000 EEIs. Our results provide the first evidence that existing PPIIP methods can be extended for the EEI prediction task, showing F-score, precision, and recall performances of up to [~]38%, [~]63%, and [~]28%, respectively, with a false discovery rate of less than 5%. Our study provides insights into the power and limits of existing PPIIP methods to predict EEIs, thus guiding future developments of computational methods for the EEI prediction task. We provide streamlined computational pipelines integrating each of the three considered PPIIP methods for the EEI prediction task to be utilized by the scientific community.

bioinformatics↗