Biology subjects

Kote-Jarai, Z.

Publications and source records attributed to Kote-Jarai, Z..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Novel Methylation Markers in a Prostate Cancer Cohort are Associated with Disease Development and Relapse

Prostate cancer remains one of the most common cancers among men globally. While significant strides have been made in diagnosis and treatment, understanding the complex genetic and epigenetic underpinnings of the disease remains crucial for guiding intervention and developing more personalized and effective therapies. The importance of DNA methylation in prostate cancer has been known for some time, but important facets of the modulation of the epigenome during carcinogenesis remain obscure, partly because the bulk of cancer methylation data have been produced using microarray technologies. Here we utilise the TruSeq methyl capture method (EPICseq) to profile the, previously defined, UK Prostate ICGC cohort of well-annotated primary prostate cancers. To this we add methylation sequencing of benign tissue from the same men. These data allow us to identify differentially methylated regions distinguishing cancerous and non-cancerous prostate tissue, while identifying numerous genes whose methylation profiles can perform that task as well as distinguishing between classes of prostate cancer. We describe a describe a methylation-based control mechanism for prostate-cancer-associated SNPs, and show that this seems a likely mechanism of action for a SNP near the MMP7 gene. We describe three novel molecular signatures that arise from different aspects of the biology of prostate cancer revealed by sequencing. Each is shown to be an independent classifier of cancers into groups with different expected times to relapse. These consist of patterns in driver gene methylation, strand-specific methylation, and signal arising in mitochondrial reads. We show that these signatures, combined with existing molecular tools, provide a powerful predictor of time to recurrence. By substantially enhancing understanding of prostate cancer risk, detection, and prognosis, we pave the way for the development of clinical practices that will benefit patients and improve outcomes.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Competitive Amplification Networks enable molecular pattern recognition with PCR

Gene expression has great potential to be used as a clinical diagnostic tool. However, despite the progress in identifying these gene expression signatures, clinical translation has been hampered by a lack of purpose-built. readily deployable testing platforms. We have developed Competitive Amplification Networks. CANs to enable analysis of an entire gene expression signature in a single PCR reaction. CANs consist of natural and synthetic amplicons that compete for shared primers during amplification, forming a reaction network that leverages the molecular machinery of PCR. These reaction components are tuned such that the final fluorescent signal from the assay is exactly calibrated to the conclusion of a statistical model. In essence, the reaction acts as a biological computer, simultaneously detecting the RNA targets, interpreting their level in the context of the gene expression signature, and aggregating their contributions to the final diagnosis. We illustrate the clinical validity of this technique, demonstrating perfect diagnostic agreement with the gold-standard approach of measuring each gene independently. Crucially, CAN assays are compatible with existing qPCR instruments and workflows. CANs hold the potential to enable rapid deployment and massive scalability of gene expression analysis to clinical laboratories around the world, in highly developed and low-resource J settings alike. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=162 SRC="FIGDIR/small/546934v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@79d1c5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bafb87org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d78e31org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b85125_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2019

The effect of sample size on polygenic hazard models for prostate cancer

We aimed to determine the effect of sample size on performance of polygenic hazard score (PHS) models in predicting the age at onset of prostate cancer. Age and genotypes were obtained for 40,861 men from the PRACTICAL consortium. The dataset included 201,590 SNPs per subject, and was split into training (34,444 samples) and testing (6,417 samples) sets. Two PHS model-building strategies were investigated. Established-SNP model considered 65 SNPs that had been associated with prostate cancer in the literature. A stepwise SNP selection was used to develop Discovery-SNP models. The performance of each PHS model was calculated for random sizes of the training set (1 to 30 thousand). The performance of a representative Established-SNP model was estimated for random sizes of the testing set (0.5 to 6 thousand). Mean HR98/50 (hazard ratio of top 2% to the average in the test set) of the Established-SNP model increased from 1.73[95%CI: 1.69-1.77] to 2.41[2.40-2.43] when the number of training samples was increased from 1 to 30 thousand. The corresponding HR98/50 of the Discovery-SNP model increased from 1.05[0.93-1.18] to 2.19[2.16-2.23]. HR98/50 of a representative Established-SNP model using testing set sample sizes of 0.6 and 6 thousand observations were 1.78[1.70-1.85] and 1.73[1.71-1.76], respectively. We estimate that a study population of 20 to 30 thousand men is required to develop Discovery-SNP PHS models for prostate cancer. The required sample size could be reduced to 10 thousand samples, if a set of SNPs associated with the disease has already been established.\n\nAuthor summaryPolygenic hazard scores represent a recent advancement in polygenic prediction to model the age of onset of various diseases, such as Alzheimers disease or prostate cancer. These scores accumulate small effect sizes from several tens of genetic variants and can be used to establish an individuals risk of experiencing an event relative to a control population across time. The largest barrier to the development of polygenic hazard scores is the large number of study subjects needed to develop the underlying models. We sought to understand the effect of varying the total number of samples on the performance of a polygenic hazard score in the context of prostate cancer. We found that the performance of the score did not appreciably change beyond 20 to 30 thousand observations when developing the model from scratch. However, when the discovery of the genetic variants can be borrowed from those already identified in the literature to be associated with the disease, the required number of samples is reduced to 10 thousand with no appreciable detriment in performance. We hope that these results can guide the design of future studies of polygenic scores in other diseases and demonstrate the importance of genome-wide association studies.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

A genetic hazard score to personalize prostate cancer screening, applied to population data

BackgroundGenetic risk stratification may inform decisions of whether--and when--a man should undergo prostate cancer (PCa) screening. We previously validated a polygenic hazard score (PHS), a weighted sum of 54 single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes, for accurate prediction of age of onset of aggressive PCa and improved screening performance. We now assess the potential impact of PHS-informed screening.\n\nMethodsUnited Kingdom population data were fit to a continuous model of age-specific PCa incidence. Using hazard ratios estimated from ProtecT trial data, age-specific incidence rates were calculated for percentiles of genetic risk. Incidence of higher-grade PCa (Gleason[≥]7) was estimated from age-specific data from the linked CAP trial. PHS and incidence data were combined to give a risk-equivalent age, when a man with a given PHS percentile will have risk of higher-grade PCa equivalent to that of a typical man at age 50 (50-years standard). Positive predictive value (PPV) of PSA testing was calculated using PHS-adjusted (PCa-risk-equivalent age) groups identified from ProtecT.\n\nResultsExpected age of onset of higher-grade PCa is modulated by 19 years between the 1st and 99th PHS percentiles. A man with PHS in the 99th percentile reaches 50-years-standard risk at age 41; conversely, a man in the 1st percentile reaches this risk at age 60. PPV of PSA was higher for men with higher PHS-adjusted age.\n\nConclusionsPHS informs PCa screening strategies with individualized estimates of risk-equivalent age for higher-grade PCa. Screening initiation could be adjusted according to a mans genetic hazard score, improving PPV of PSA screening.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Large-scale transcriptome-wide association study identifies new prostate cancer risk regions

Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for prostate cancer (PrCa) have identified more than 100 risk regions, most of the risk genes at these regions remain largely unknown. Here, we integrate the largest PrCa GWAS (N=142,392) with gene expression measured in 45 tissues (N=4,458), including normal and tumor prostate, to perform a multi-tissue transcriptomewide association study (TWAS) for PrCa. We identify 235 genes at 87 independent 1Mb regions associated with PrCa risk, 9 of which are regions with no genome-wide significant SNP within 2Mb. 24 genes are significant in TWAS only for alternative splicing models in prostate tumor thus supporting the hypothesis of splicing driving risk for continued oncogenesis. Finally, we use a Bayesian probabilistic approach to estimate credible sets of genes containing the causal gene at pre-defined level; this reduced the list of 235 associations to 120 genes in the 90% credible set. Overall, our findings highlight the power of integrating expression with PrCa GWAS to identify novel risk loci and prioritize putative causal genes at known risk loci.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2016

A genetic risk score to guide age-specific, personalized prostate cancer screening

BackgroundProstate-specific-antigen (PSA) screening resulted in reduced prostate cancer (PCa) mortality in a large clinical trial, but due to a high false-positive rate, among other concerns, many guidelines do not endorse universal screening and instead recommend an individualized decision based on each patients risk. Genetic risk may provide key information to guide the decisions of whether and at what age to screen an individual man for PCa.\n\nMethodsGenotype, PCa status, and age from 34,444 men of European ancestry from the PRACTICAL consortium database were analyzed to select single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with prostate cancer diagnosis. These SNPs were then incorporated into a survival analysis to estimate their effects on age at PCa diagnosis. The resulting polygenic hazard score (PHS) is an assessment of individual genetic risk. The final model was validated in an independent dataset comprised of 6,417 men with screening PSA and genotype data. PHS was calculated for these men to test for prediction of PCa-free survival. PHS was also combined with age-specific PCa incidence data from the U.S. population to generate a PCa-Risk (PCaR) age that relates a given mans risk to that of the population average. PHS and PCaR age were evaluated for prediction of positive predictive value (PPV) of PSA screening.\n\nFindingsPHS calculated from 54 SNPs was very highly predictive of age at PCa diagnosis for men in the validation set (p =10-53). PPV of PSA screening varied from 0.18 to 0.52 for men with low and high genetic risk, respectively. PHS modulates PCa-free survival curves by an estimated 20 years between men in the 1st or 99th percentiles of genetic risk.\n\nInterpretationPolygenic hazard scores give personalized genetic risk estimates and can inform the decisions of whether and at what age to screen a man for PCa.\n\nFundingDepartment of Defense #W81XWH-13-1-0391

genetics↗