Omitted familial extrinsic risk inflates inferred intrinsic lifespan heritability
Shenhar et al. (2026) report 50% "intrinsic" lifespan heritability after calibrating a one-component correlated-frailty survival model to Scandinavian twin lifespans. Their framework is mathematically coherent, but the intrinsic component is not identified if heritable, mortality-relevant extrinsic susceptibility is omitted at calibration. We show that one-component calibration absorbs omitted familial extrinsic structure into the intrinsic frailty scale parameter{sigma}{theta} , and that this variance absorption is visible through separate diagnostics (1) Variance absorption. Under misspecification,{sigma}{theta} is inflated by +22.1% (95% CI: 21.5-22.7%), corresponding to +49% inflation in [Formula]. Falconer h2 is downstream of calibration and inherits a +9.2 pp bias (95% CI: 8.7-9.7). The{sigma}{theta} inflation is model-general: +22% (GM), +18% (MGG), +14% (SR); any dependence summary that is strictly increasing in{sigma}{theta} inherits this inflation, so Falconer h2 is one affected downstream quantity among many (Corollary B3). (2) Structural fingerprint. In the joint twin survival surface S(t1, t2), misspecification produces systematic dependence errors (ISE 48x that of the recovery model). Conditional twin dependence is inflated at all ages, peaking at age 80 ({Delta}r = 0.048). (3) Specificity. The bias requires an omitted component that is both heritable and mortality-relevant. Three negative controls, a boundary check ({rho} = 0), and a two-component recovery refit ({sigma}{theta} restored to within -3.2%) establish specificity. ACE decomposition yields C {approx} 0 throughout: the omitted extrinsic component loads onto A (because it is shared 1.0/0.5 in MZ/DZ), so switching summary statistics does not restore identification. (4) Sensitivity and falsifiability. Over an empirically anchored regime ({sigma}{gamma} [isin] [0.30, 0.65],{rho} [isin] [0.20, 0.50]), Falconer bias ranges from +2.8 to +18.9 pp (mean 9 pp). If{rho} is sufficiently negative, the bias reverses sign in all three model families (Corollary B4). A full-likelihood robustness check shows that this upward pull is partly structural and partly estimator-specific: in the same misspecified one-component model, ML still inflates{sigma}{theta} (+3%), whereas matching only rMZ inflates it much more (+21%). These results do not resolve true intrinsic heritability but establish that Shenhars 50% estimate carries a structured, model-general upward bias originating in the fitted latent variance{sigma}{theta} .