bioRxiv2026
Advances in transcriptome profiling have revealed transcriptomic differences across different cellular states. However, functional interpretation requires precise perturbation tools and experimental frameworks. This study benchmarked two widely used modalities: CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and Cas13d/CasRx. A standardized workflow was established to generate human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) with inducible ZIM3-dCas9 or CasRx expression. The cell lines were subjected to flow cytometry, copy number, and immunocytochemical analyses. The knockdown performance was validated via robust OCT4 suppression and the expected downstream effects on pluripotency genes. Time-course measurements indicated that CRISPRi produced faster and stronger repression but slower recovery after inducer withdrawal. In contrast, CasRx yielded slower and typically weaker knockdown with rapid reversibility. Furthermore, a key limitation of CRISPRi was demonstrated using the ATF5-NUP62 locus, wherein CRISPRi could co-repress genes with overlapping promoter regions. In contrast, CasRx avoids these limitations and supports isoform-resolved targeting of circular and alternatively spliced transcripts, albeit with variable efficiency. These results provide practical guidance for selecting complementary knockdown tools to improve the interpretability of transcriptomic function studies. MOTIVATIONAdvances in transcriptome profiling have enabled the detection of subtle cell type-specific differences. However, mechanistic interpretation still depends on perturbation tools that can modulate transcripts with high precision and efficiency. Recent CRISPR-based modalities, CRISPRi and Cas13/CasRx, function as robust and orthogonal methods to achieve the knockdown of specific gene targets. However, a standardized approach for cell line preparation and comparative studies on their relative performances and limitations remains unclear. Consequently, this study presents a standardized workflow for generating cell lines that support high-efficiency knockdown using CRISPRi and CasRx. Moreover, it compares the trade-offs in potency, reversibility, and isoform resolution, along with a practical overview of method-specific pitfalls to guide tool selection and data interpretation in future studies. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIDoxycycline-inducible AAVS1 knock-in human PSC platforms for CRISPRi (ZIM3-dCas9) and CasRx (RfxCas13d) were generated to enable standardized RNA perturbation experiments. C_LIO_LIThe prepared cell lines demonstrated strong OCT4 knockdown, with expected downstream effects on the expression of another pluripotency gene, NANOG. C_LIO_LIA comparison of knockdown characteristics and their reversibility revealed rapid and sustained repression with CRISPRi, whereas slow but rapid recovery was observed with CasRx. C_LIO_LIA CRISPRi-specific off-target effect arising from TSS proximity/overlap (ATF5-NUP62) was identified, whereas CasRx achieved ATF5 knockdown without collateral repression of the neighboring NUP62 gene. C_LIO_LICasRx enables isoform-resolved knockdown of structural isoforms (circHIPK3 vs. linear HIPK3 mRNA) and splice isoforms (RAB6A-iso1 vs. RAB6A-iso2). C_LI