Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chatelain, Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Chatelain, Y..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Untrained Convolutional Neural Networks as Feature Extractors for Structural MRI

We demonstrate that features extracted from structural MRI using un-CNN, an untrained convolutional neural network, achieve predictive performance comparable to or exceeding that of state-of-the-art pretrained foundation models across three structural MRI datasets and three downstream tasks. Un-CNN extends a classical 3D CNN architecture with multi-channel inputs, a hierarchical encoder with multi-scale feature aggregation, and covariance pooling. Untrained CNNs circumvent several key limitations of trained models, including high computational cost and memory requirements, the need to distribute large model weights, risks of data leakage, and challenges in reproducibility.

neuroscience↗

Numerical Variability of functional MRI Graph Measures

Network neuroscience provides a powerful framework for studying the mechanisms underlying brain-related diseases. As analyses become increasingly computational, ensuring their numerical reliability has become a critical challenge. Small perturbations introduced during processing can propagate through complex pipelines, leading to variability in outcomes and raising concerns about the reproducibility of reported findings. Addressing this issue requires systematic evaluation of pipeline stability to ensure results remain within acceptable numerical limits. While the numerical variability of structural imaging workflows has been investigated, with findings ranging from negligible to substantial, functional MRI (fMRI) pipelines and their derived graph measures remain underexplored. Without rigorous stability assessment, conclusions drawn from these measures may remain uncertain. We systematically evaluated the numerical variability of graph measures of functional connectivity derived from the widely-used fMRIPrep pipeline and compared it to population variability. The resulting Numerical-Population Variability Ratio (NPVR) values typically ranged from 0.1 to 0.2 for most graph metrics, indicating a measurable influence of numerical variability on network-derived outcomes. NPVR values varied across brain regions, thresholding choices, and confound regression strategies. These findings highlight numerical variability as an important factor in functional network studies, particularly when examining subtle effects or working with small sample sizes.

neuroscience↗

The impact of FreeSurfer versions on structural neuroimaging analyses of Parkinson's disease

Image processing software impacts the quantification of brain measures, playing an important role in the search for clinical biomarkers. We investigated the impact of the variability between FreeSurfer releases on the estimation of structural brain measures in Parkinsons disease (PD). Structural brain scans from 106 controls and 209 patients were analyzed with FreeSurfer versions 5.3, 6.0.1, and 7.3.2, including longitudinal data from 125 patients. First, we measured the differences in the estimation of volume, surface area, and cortical thickness between FreeSurfer versions. Second, we focused on the relationship between MRI-derived brain measures and group differences as well as disease severity clinical outcomes, which were evaluated both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. We found high software-induced variability in the estimation of all three structural measures, which impacted clinical outcomes. There were differences between software versions in group differences between patients and healthy controls in subcortical volume and vertex-wise cortical thickness. Software variability also impacted the estimated relationship between brain structure and disease severity in patients. Hence, software variability not only relates to the estimation of structural measures, but it also impacts clinically- relevant MRI measures. Our study provides insight into the reproducibility of structural neuroimaging studies in PD populations.

neuroscience↗

Predicting Parkinson's disease progression using MRI-based white matter radiomic biomarker and machine learning: a reproducibility and replicability study

BackgroundThe availability of reliable biomarkers of Parkinsons disease (PD) progression is critical to the understanding of the disease and development of treatment options. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides a promising source of PD biomarkers, however, neuroimaging results have been shown to be markedly sensitive to analytical conditions and population sampling, which motivates investigations of their robustness. This study is part of a project to investigate the replicability of 11 structural MRI measures of PD identified in a recent review. ObjectiveThis paper attempts to reproduce (similar data, similar analysis) and replicate (variations in data and analysis) the design of the machine learning (ML) model described in [1] to predict PD progression from T1-weighted MRIs. MethodsWe used the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative dataset (PPMI, ppmi-info.org) used in [1] and we followed as closely as possible the original methods. We also investigated slight methodological variations in cohort selection, feature extraction, ML model design, and evaluation techniques. ResultsThe Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) achieved by our model closely reproducing the original study remained lower than 0.5. Across all tested models, we obtained a peak AUC of 0.685, which is better than chance performance but remained lower than the AUC value of 0.795 reported in [1]. ConclusionWe managed to train a model that predicts disease progression with a performance better than chance on a cohort extracted from the PPMI dataset, using methods adapted from [1]. However, the performance of this model remains substantially lower than the one reported in [1]. Our difficulties to reproduce or replicate the original work are likely explained by the relatively low sample size in the original study. We provide recommendations on how to improve the reproducibility of MRI-based ML models of PD in the future.

neuroscience↗

Longitudinal brain structure changes in Parkinson's disease: a replication study

ContextAn existing major challenge in Parkinsons disease (PD) research is the identification of biomarkers of disease progression. While Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a potential source of PD biomarkers, none of the MRI measures of PD are robust enough to warrant their adoption in clinical research. This study is part of a project that aims to replicate 11 PD studies reviewed in a recent survey (JAMA neurology, 78(10) 2021) to investigate the robustness of PD neuroimaging findings to data and analytical variations. ObjectiveThis study attempts to replicate the results in Hanganu et al. (Brain, 137(4) 2014) using data from the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). MethodsUsing 25 PD subjects and 18 healthy controls, we analyzed the rate of change of cortical thickness and of the volume of subcortical structures, and we measured the relationship between MRI structural changes and cognitive decline. We compared our findings to the results in the original study. ResultsSimilarly to the original study, PD patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) exhibited increased cortical thinning over time compared to patients without MCI in the right middle temporal gyrus, insula, and precuneus. (2) The rate of cortical thinning in the left inferior temporal and precentral gyri in PD patients correlated with the change in cognitive performance. (3) There were no group differences in the change of subcortical volumes. (4) We did not find a relationship between the change in subcortical volumes and the change in cognitive performance. ConclusionDespite important differences in the dataset used in this replication study, and despite differences in sample size, we were able to partially replicate the original results. We produced a publicly available reproducible notebook allowing researchers to further investigate the reproducibility of the results in Hanganu et al. (2014) when more data becomes available in PPMI.

neuroscience↗

Data Augmentation Through Monte Carlo Arithmetic Leads to More Generalizable Classification in Connectomics

Machine learning models are commonly applied to human brain imaging datasets in an effort to associate function or structure with behaviour, health, or other individual phenotypes. Such models often rely on low-dimensional maps generated by complex processing pipelines. However, the numerical instabilities inherent to pipelines limit the fidelity of these maps and introduce computational bias. Monte Carlo Arithmetic, a technique for introducing controlled amounts of numerical noise, was used to perturb a structural connectome estimation pipeline, ultimately producing a range of plausible networks for each sample. The variability in the perturbed networks was captured in an augmented dataset, which was then used for an age classification task. We found that resampling brain networks across a series of such numerically perturbed outcomes led to improved performance in all tested classifiers, preprocessing strategies, and dimensionality reduction techniques. Importantly, we find that this benefit does not hinge on a large number of perturbations, suggesting that even minimally perturbing a dataset adds meaningful variance which can be captured in the subsequently designed models. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=65 SRC="FIGDIR/small/423084v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (17K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bccd23org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13fcfe1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@68e987org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bbada9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG This paper demonstrates how Monte Carlo Arithmetic, a dataagnostic perturbation technique, can be used for dataset augmentation during the generation of structural connectomes and improve downstream phenotypic prediction. C_FIG

neuroscience↗

Numerical Instabilities in Analytical Pipelines Lead to Large and Meaningful Variability in Brain Networks

The analysis of brain-imaging data requires complex processing pipelines to support findings on brain function or pathologies. Recent work has shown that variability in analytical decisions, small amounts of noise, or computational environments can lead to substantial differences in the results, endangering the trust in conclusions1-7. We explored the instability of results by instrumenting a connectome estimation pipeline with Monte Carlo Arithmetic8,9 to introduce random noise throughout. We evaluated the reliability of the connectomes, their features10,11, and the impact on analysis12,13. The stability of results was found to range from perfectly stable to highly unstable. This paper highlights the potential of leveraging induced variance in estimates of brain connectivity to reduce the bias in networks alongside increasing the robustness of their applications in the classification of individual differences. We demonstrate that stability evaluations are necessary for understanding error inherent to brain imaging experiments, and how numerical analysis can be applied to typical analytical workflows both in brain imaging and other domains of computational science. Overall, while the extreme variability in results due to analytical instabilities could severely hamper our understanding of brain organization, it also leads to an increase in the reliability of datasets.

neuroscience↗