Calancie, O. G. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2025

Learning to blink strategically is crucial to performance in a predictable saccade task and varies across the lifespan

Humans blink their eyes 16-20 times each minute to spread tear film on the cornea, representing a substantial amount of waking time when ones eyes are closed. These spontaneous blinks are strategically timed to prioritize the processing of important visual input, balancing both stimulus characteristics and personal goals. Until now, the learning process underlying optimal blink timing has not been investigated in detail. Here, we present video-based eye-tracking data from 703 healthy participants (aged 5-91 years, 470 female) performing a structured interleaved pro-/anti-saccade task, in which we previously found that blink suppression occurs in anticipation of visual stimulus appearance (Pitigoi et al., 2024). Our goals are to understand (1) how participants modify their blink timing according to the temporal contingencies of the task; (2) whether the capacity to optimize blink timing impacts performance; and (3) whether this pattern varies with age. We found that participants quickly and strategically modified their blink distribution to optimize task performance. Blink probability decreased in periods that would compromise anti-saccade execution and increased when visual input was less critical. We also found significant differences in blink patterns and adaptive ability based on cognitive control capacity (indicated by participants anti-saccade error rates). Furthermore, we demonstrated that blink optimization improves gradually from childhood to early adulthood, before declining with advanced age. This supports a possible link between regulation of blink behavior and age-related changes in learning capacity and inhibitory control across the lifespan.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Impulsivity and Emotional Dysregulation Predict Choice Behavior During a Competitive Multiplayer Game in Adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder

Impulsivity and emotional dysregulation are two core features of borderline personality disorder (BPD), and the neural mechanisms recruited during mixed-strategy interactions overlap with frontolimbic networks that have been implicated in BPD. We investigated strategic choice patterns during the classic two-player game, Matching Pennies, where the most efficient strategy is to choose each option randomly from trial-to-trial to avoid exploitation by one's opponent. Twenty-seven female adolescents with BPD (mean age: 16 years) and twenty-seven age-matched female controls (mean age: 16 years) participated in an experiment that explored the relationship between strategic choice behavior and impulsivity in both groups and emotional dysregulation in BPD. Relative to controls, BPD participants showed fewer reinforcement learning biases, increased coefficient of variation in reaction times (CV), and more anticipatory decisions. A subset of BPD participants characterized by high levels of impulsivity and emotional dysregulation showed increased reward rate, increased entropy in choice patterns, decreased CV, and fewer anticipatory decisions relative to participants with lower indices, and emotion dysregulation mediated the relationship between impulsivity and CV in BPD. Finally, exploratory analyses revealed that increased vigilance to outcome was associated with higher reward rates, decreased variability in SRT, and fewer anticipatory decisions. In BPD, higher levels of emotion dysregulation corresponded to increased vigilance to outcome, and mediated its relationship with choice behavior. Together, our results suggest that impulsivity and emotional dysregulation contribute to variability in mixed-strategy decision-making in BPD, the latter of which may influence choice behavior by increasing attention to outcome information during the task.

neuroscience↗