Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Baskaran, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Baskaran, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Changes in Iris Stiffness and Permeability in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

PurposeTo evaluate the biomechanical properties of the iris by evaluating iris movement during pupil constriction and to compare such properties between healthy and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) subjects. MethodsA total of 140 subjects were recruited for this study. In a dark room, the anterior segments of one eye per subject were scanned using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT, SS-1000 CASIA, Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan) imaging during induced pupil constriction with an external white light source of 1700 lux. Using a custom segmentation code, we automatically isolated the iris segments from the AS-OCT images, which were then discretized and transformed into a three-dimensional point cloud. For each iris, a finite element (FE) mesh was constructed from the point cloud, and an inverse FE simulation was performed to match the clinically observed iris constriction in the AS-OCT images. Through this optimization process, we were able to identify the elastic modulus and permeability of each iris. ResultsFor all 140 subjects (95 healthy and 45 PACG of Indian/Chinese ethnicity, Age: 60.2{+/-}8.7 for PACG subjects and 57.7{+/-}10.1 for healthy subjects), the simulated deformation pattern of the iris during pupil constriction matched well with OCT images. We found that the iris stiffness was higher in PACG than in healthy controls (24.5{+/-}8.4 kPa vs 17.1{+/-}6.6 kPa with 40 kPa of active stress specified in the sphincter region; p < 0.001), whereas iris permeability was lower (0.41{+/-}0.2 mm2/kPa.s vs 0.55{+/-}0.2 mm2/kPa.s; p = 0.142). ConclusionThis study suggests that the biomechanical properties of the iris in PACG are different from those in healthy controls. An improved understanding of the biomechanical behavior of the iris may have implications for the understanding and management of angle-closure glaucoma.

bioengineering↗

Optic Nerve Tortuosity and Globe Proptosis in Normal and Glaucoma Subjects

PurposeTo assess the difference in optic nerve tortuosity during eye movements and globe proptosis between primary open angle glaucoma and normal subjects using orbital magnetic resonance imaging.\n\nMethods10 Chinese subjects matched for age, ethnicity and refractive errors were recruited, including five normal controls and five patients with primary open angle glaucoma. All subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging to assess their optic nerves and globes for three eye positions: primary gaze, adduction and abduction. Optic nerve tortuosity (optic nerve length divided by the distance between two ends) and globe proptosis (maximum distance between cornea and interzygomatic line) were measured from magnetic resonance imaging images.\n\nResultsIn adduction, the tortuosity of normal eyes was significantly larger than that of the glaucomatous eyes. Optic nerve tortuosity in adduction in the control and glaucoma groups were 1.004{+/-}0.003 (mean {+/-} standard deviation) and 1.001{+/-}0.001, respectively (p=0.037). Globe proptosis (primary gaze) in glaucoma subjects (19.14{+/-}2.11 mm) was significantly higher than that in control subjects (15.32{+/-}2.79 mm; p = 0.046).\n\nConclusionsIn this sample, subjects with glaucoma exhibited more taut optic nerves and more protruding eye globes compared to normal eyes. This may impact optic nerve head deformations in anatomically predisposed patients.\n\nPrecisEyes with glaucoma have tauter optic nerves compared with normal eyes, which may exert more force on the optic nerve head tissues during eye movements.

pathology↗