Behavioral signatures suggest distinct modes of suppressing irrelevant information during tactile temporal attention in human participants
To make adaptive perceptual judgments, the nervous system must selectively process behaviorally relevant sensory information while filtering out competing distractions. Although attentional control has been extensively studied in the visual domain, particularly in the context of spatial selection, considerably less is known about how attention operates in the tactile modality and across time rather than space. Here, we developed a paradigm to investigate temporal tactile attention in human participants, enabling the study of attentional behavior and underlying behavioral strategies in this sensory domain. Participants were instructed to categorize the intensity of a task-relevant tactile stimulus delivered to the fingertip while ignoring an irrelevant tactile stimulus. A visual cue indicated which of two sequentially presented stimuli was relevant on each trial. In addition, participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing autistic traits and aberrant salience (the tendency to assign significance to otherwise neutral stimuli or events). Across subjects, participants performed the task with high accuracy. However, clustering analyses based on behavioral features revealed distinct response profiles. One cluster did not exhibit biases induced by the irrelevant stimulus. In contrast, a third cluster displayed a repulsive effect of the irrelevant stimulus and showed lower overall performance. These behavioral phenotypes were also reflected, to some extent, in differences in learning trajectories across training sessions. We further explored participants' metacognitive awareness through a post-experiment questionnaire assessing subjective evaluations of task difficulty and performance. Although exploratory, the results suggest a relationship between metacognitive reports, behavioral strategies, and objective task performance. In contrast, neither autistic traits nor aberrant salience scores were associated with performance measures or behavioral phenotypes. Together, these findings support the view that attentional control is implemented through multiple, individualistic behavioral strategies rather than a single mechanism pertaining to all, suggesting that task structure interacts with individual predispositions to shape distinct modes of attentional control in human participants.