bioRxiv2018
The dimensionality of a networks collective activity is of increasing interest in neuroscience. This is because dimensionality provides a compact measure of how coordinated network-wide activity is, in terms of the number of modes (or degrees of freedom) that it can independently explore. A low number of modes suggests a compressed low dimensional neural code and reveals interpretable dynamics [1], while findings of high dimension may suggest flexible computations [2, 3]. Here, we address the fundamental question of how dimensionality is related to connectivity, in both autonomous and stimulus-driven networks. Working with a simple spiking network model, we derive three main findings. First, the dimensionality of global activity patterns can be strongly, and systematically, regulated by local connectivity structures. Second, the dimensionality is a better indicator than average correlations in determining how constrained neural activity is. Third, stimulus evoked neural activity interacts systematically with neural connectivity patterns, leading to network responses of either greater or lesser dimensionality than the stimulus.\n\nAuthor summaryNew recording technologies are producing an amazing explosion of data on neural activity. These data reveal the simultaneous activity of hundreds or even thousands of neurons. In principle, the activity of these neurons could explore a vast space of possible patterns. This is what is meant by high-dimensional activity: the number of degrees of freedom (or \"modes\") of multineuron activity is large, perhaps as large as the number of neurons themselves. In practice, estimates of dimensionality differ strongly from case to case, and do so in interesting ways across experiments, species, and brain areas. The outcome is important for much more than just accurately describing neural activity: findings of low dimension have been proposed to allow data compression, denoising, and easily readable neural codes, while findings of high dimension have been proposed as signatures of powerful and general computations. So what is it about a neural circuit that leads to one case or the other? Here, we derive a set of principles that inform how the connectivity of a spiking neural network determines the dimensionality of the activity that it produces. These show that, in some cases, highly localized features of connectivity have strong control over a networks global dimensionality--an interesting finding in the context of, e.g., learning rules that occur locally. We also show how dimension can be much different than first meets the eye with typical \"pairwise\" measurements, and how stimuli and intrinsic connectivity interact in shaping the overall dimension of a networks response.