Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.10.23.761342

When do bacterial mechanosensitive channels get activated?

Abstract

Bacterial cell envelopes are complex multilayer structures that combine mechanical protection with a multitude of transport and sensory functions. Bacteria maintain substantial turgor pressures which is needed to withstand external forces, grow and maintain shape. An osmotic downshock can create fatal pressure levels. To survive, bacteria rapidly release osmolytes, mainly ions and small metabolites, through mechanosensitive channels (Mscs). Mscs are embedded in the plasma membrane (PM) and act as pressure/tension-activated valves, reducing pressure and preserving cell integrity. It is not well understood, however, how overall stresses are distributed among the layers of the cell envelope, and, in particular, when tension would be borne by the PM and felt by the channels. In this study, we numerically and analytically examine stress distributions within a two-layer model of the cell envelope under varying turgor pressure. We use experimentally determined parameters for PM and peptidoglycan (PG) elasticities, and include enzyme/antibiotic induced weakening of the PG. We introduce, as a critical parameter, a PM reservoir, without which an observed substantial area increase during the shock would not be possible without PM rupture. We used finite-element simulations to model cell swelling assuming linear elasticity of the envelope components, and analytical calculations to model nonlinear PG strain hardening. We analyzed tension sharing between PG and PM with varying PM reservoir sizes during osmotic downshocks. We estimate that an envelope area increase of slightly more than 50% would occur at a turgor pressure of ~11 atm and would be sufficient to fully unfold a 50% PM reservoir and also generate sufficient PM tension to activate mechanosensitive channels. A softening of the PG layer with lysozyme or {beta}-lactam antibiotics is predicted to increase cell expansion at a given turgor pressure and trigger earlier activation of mechanosensitive channels, leading to increased, deleterious metabolite loss.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S B, S. S., Albarran, O., Garces, R., Eldredge, J. D., Sukharev, S., Schmidt, C. F.. 2026-10-24. When do bacterial mechanosensitive channels get activated?. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.23.761342

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Cancers relax selection on charge at the mitochondrial complex I quinone cavity

Mitochondrial complex I translocates protons through hydrated channels whose connectivity and electrostatics are both defined by structure, but whether they are distinctly constrained is unknown. From a 2.39 cryo-EM structure modelling 2,945 ordered waters, we built the proton wire of the seven mtDNA-encoded ND subunits and scored all 40,166 missense substitutions on two near-orthogonal axes (r = 0.17): electrostatic shift at proton-loading sites, and topological disruption of the wire. Across 858 germline variant sites, loading sites (0.51) and cut vertices (0.67) are both depleted. In tumours only loading sites are enriched (1.42 TCGA, 1.67 PCAWG, 1.29 MSK-IMPACT), a 3.06-fold difference tested as a wire class tissue-type interaction (P = 3.6 10-). It survives adjustment for conservation, burial and coverage, and is concentrated in ND1 within 15 of the quinone cavity, not spread along the proton path. Selection separates charge from connectivity, without establishing a fitness benefit.

biophysics↗

Rugnux: from diffraction images to structure at synchrotrons and XFELs in one program

Rising data rates in macromolecular crystallography outpace multi-program pipelines on computing clusters. Rugnux, a single GPU-accelerated program, turns rotation or serial still diffraction images into merged data and an initial structure. At synchrotrons, results arrive seconds after the last image; on one workstation, 207 public datasets from 36 sources took a median of 15 s each, with deposition-quality. Serial XFEL data were processed faster than the collection rate, enabling real-time structure determination.

biophysics↗

Phase Separation of Intracellular Proteins Influences Synaptic Bistability

Synaptic bistability at the post synaptic density has been proposed to be the result of the nucleation and evaporation of receptor clusters. The exact biophysical mechanism underlying these inter-receptor attractions that can trigger nucleation remains to be elucidated. Emerging evidence demonstrates that numerous postsynaptic density submembrane proteins, that interact with various membrane receptors, can undergo phase separation, necessitating a revised conceptual model. By employing Langevin dynamics simulations of coarse-grained scaffold proteins and interacting membrane receptors, we study how phase transitions of scaffold proteins alter receptor clustering at the membrane. In our model, scaffold macromolecules can undergo phase separation and interact with receptor molecules at the model membranes. We observed that the presence of scaffold polymers across the membrane creates an attractive interaction between otherwise purely repulsive receptors. By systematically varying the number of receptors at the membrane, we dissected the coupling between receptor clustering and the phase behavior of scaffold macromolecules. We show that the propensity for receptor clustering is enhanced by the condensation of scaffold proteins. We then used two different scaffolds and systematically varied the interaction between them, to change the spatial organization of two condensed phases w.r.t. one another. Interestingly, we observed that receptor clustering can be reduced by co-phase separation of scaffold macromolecules, indicating the role of competing interactions in receptor clustering. Our work advances understanding of receptor-mediated signaling and phase separation, providing insights into cellular compartmentalization and biochemical regulation at the synapse.

biophysics↗