Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.10.23.760846

A preclinical platform for focused ultrasound delivery from microplate to awake brain

Abstract

Background. Focused ultrasound (FUS) has broad therapeutic potential, but its mechanisms of action are poorly understood. Preclinical FUS research enables rigorous interrogation of understudied parameters, but fragmented, single-purpose benchtop devices prevent standardized acoustic exposure across models. Objective. To describe a unified preclinical FUS platform for cell culture, ex vivo tissue, and awake stereotaxic in vivo delivery in one lightweight system, validated using glioblastoma as a disease model. Methods. We performed single-well FUS delivery to 96-well microplates, single-well delivery to freshly resected human glioblastoma tissue, and stereotaxic transcranial delivery to awake, head-fixed mice ambulating freely on a floating cage. Output was independently calibrated in free field, with measured microplate insertion loss. Pulsed low-intensity focused ultrasound (pLIFU) was applied to GL261-bearing mice, resected human glioblastoma, and macrophage cell lines. Results. Awake stereotaxic pLIFU produced acute tumor signal attenuation in GL261-bearing mice (mean log2 fold-change -1.66 versus +5.20 controls, p = 0.016) with bioluminescence evidence consistent with focal targeting. Ex vivo pLIFU produced directionally consistent immunophenotypic shifts in human glioblastoma (increased iNOS+, decreased Arg1+ populations). In vitro, pLIFU reduced CD80 on immunosuppressive macrophages to 73% of baseline in RAW 264.7 cells (p = 0.0008, n = 5) and 64% in THP-1 cells (p = 0.0006, n = 2), with MHC II upregulation in RAW 264.7 (ratio 1.65, p = 0.004) and ARG1 reduction in THP-1 (ratio 0.52, p = 0.0025). Conclusions. A unified preclinical FUS platform validated across in vitro, ex vivo, and awake in vivo applications enables stereotaxically guided transcranial FUS in awake, head-fixed mice ambulating in an exploratory manner during sonication, and single-well microplate treatments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bell, M. S., Williams, M. J., Walton, C. M., Hughes, B. W., Roddey, T. S., Oldham, B. B., Bruno, C. E., Peterson, K. D., Kendrick, B. J., Caiello, B. P., Miller, B. A., Rowland, N. C., Sahin, O., Strickland, B. A.. 2026-10-29. A preclinical platform for focused ultrasound delivery from microplate to awake brain. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.23.760846

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Individualized brain-body signatures of positive emotions revealed by large-scale multimodal neurophysiological recording

Using one of the most comprehensive multimodal biosensing datasets in affective research, densely sampled within individuals, we asked how emotions are instantiated in each person's brain and body. Four participants viewed 168 emotion-evoking videos during 128-channel EEG and 28 autonomic, ocular and facial recordings. Cross-validated elastic-net classifiers distinguished each of 15 positive and neutral emotions from baseline in every participant (mean accuracy 87-97%). We found that no emotion was predicted by a single marker and each reflected a multimodal ensemble of cortical and autonomic activity whose composition was largely person-specific. Yet physiology-derived groupings converged selectively with self-report; Interest-Awe-Amusement-Satisfaction and Entrancement-Aesthetic Appreciation recurred across individuals based on physiology. Across emotion groups, frontal and posterior delta, posterior alpha and electrodermal activity formed a shared backbone, plausibly reflecting affective and sensory engagement, whereas cardiovascular and facial signals varied between people. This framework yields individualized, objective neurophysiological indicators of emotion, potentially aiding personalized diagnosis.

neuroscience↗

Executive and language systems competitively shape predictive processing during reading

When we read, our brains constantly generate predictions about upcoming words, which is thought to make comprehension faster and more efficient. Yet it remains unclear whether this predictive mechanism relies on the same domain-general executive resources the brain uses for other demanding cognitive tasks, or operates largely independently within the language system. Here we tested this question using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in twenty-five healthy adults, who performed self-paced naturalistic reading, an n-back task, and a dual task of concurrent reading and n-back, allowing us to place competing demands on cognitive resources. In three sessions, we stimulated the left angular gyrus alone, the angular gyrus together with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a hub of executive control, or delivered sham stimulation, and used computational modeling of decision-making to isolate how each brain state altered the underlying cognitive processes. Combined stimulation of the angular gyrus and prefrontal cortex selectively weakened the reading-time costs of unexpected words, but only when reading competed with the working-memory task, revealing that linguistic prediction draws on executive resources specifically under cognitive load. Computational models showed that the relationship was bidirectional: Unpredictable words also disrupted concurrent working-memory decisions, slowing the accumulation of evidence and increasing response caution. Together, these findings show that predictive language processing is not a fixed, encapsulated function but is dynamically coupled to executive control when cognitive demands compete. Our results provide evidence that prediction during language comprehension is embedded within a broader, demand-sensitive cognitive architecture that flexibly coordinates linguistic and executive resources.

neuroscience↗

Brain state locks silent memories in a trained fly connectome

Complete connectomes now exist for insect nervous systems, but whether a fixed wiring diagram can learn, and what its memories consist of, is unknown. Here, we trained a spiking model of the whole male Drosophila central nervous system, 167,106 neurons with fixed wiring, to plan moves and to remember a visual cue. Spikes write the cue into neuronal adaptation, which holds it silently until the next input reads it out. Cells that hold the trace are enriched for transcripts of a calcium-activated potassium channel in fly cell atlases. The learned readout recalls the trace only in the brain state of learning: the same trace evokes a different response at another delay, and a disease-like loss of potassium current rewrites the trace and changes how it is read. Learning in the new state is spared. Memory failure can arise from a change of state rather than a loss of storage.

neuroscience↗