Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.10.14.759130

Reach plans for grasping vs. placing objects evoke different neural dynamics within a shared cortico-cerebellar mechanism.

Georgiadis, P.·Luabeya, G. N.·Freud, E.·Kohler, P. J.·Crawford, J. D.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many reach studies treat grasping as the endpoint of a reach, but grasping often initiates a sequence of actions, ending with placing the object. Grasping and placing both require object-specific encoding, but placing has different computational demands, introduced by the intent, sensory feedback, and tolerance for spatial error when alignment is required. Recent neuroimaging work suggests that object placement shares similar cortico-cerebellar networks with grasp, with modest increases in network segregation and cerebellar activity. Here, we ask whether Grasp and Place are better distinguished by their spatiotemporal dynamics in both behaviour and scalp-recorded EEG activity. Using high-density EEG and motion tracking, 31 participants performed alternating Grasp/Place movements of a 3D object from/toward an oriented target/template. Place movements were initiated faster but executed more slowly and with greater endpoint-orientation precision than Grasp, indicating distinct control strategies. ERP and microstate analyses revealed that Grasp and Place shared a peri-movement polarity switch, from posterior negativity/frontal positivity during preparation to posterior positivity/frontal negativity during execution. This shared pattern was amplified during Place preparation and prolonged during Place execution, with stronger expression of preparatory medial frontal/cerebellar and execution-related posterior/cerebellar microstate dynamics. Finally, SVM decoding indicated that task-specific information was primarily encoded in low-frequency EEG activity (below 6 Hz). These results confirm that grasping and placing recruit similar cortico-cerebellar mechanisms, yet different spatiotemporal dynamics are employed to support the distinct computational demands of these behaviours.

Explore related subjects

neurosciencePreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Georgiadis, P., Luabeya, G. N., Freud, E., Kohler, P. J., Crawford, J. D.. 2026-10-16. Reach plans for grasping vs. placing objects evoke different neural dynamics within a shared cortico-cerebellar mechanism.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.14.759130

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Brain representations of visual short-term memories during healthy human aging: occipital decline and frontoparietal compensation

Visual short-term memory declines steeply with age, but the link to neural representations of memory content remains unknown. We used fMRI decoding to relate remembered motion-direction representations in visual and frontoparietal cortex to age and performance, in 115 adults, aged 25-87, from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) cohort. Decoding was strongest in visual cortex, but also significant in frontoparietal regions, with different profiles. Visual representations weakened with memory load and age, and statistically mediated age-related performance decline, especially during recall. This coupling, however, weakened with age: some older adults retained stronger visual representations than performance implied, suggesting impaired access to a partially preserved memory trace. Frontoparietal representations, instead, were largely insensitive to load and strengthened with age during maintenance, partially offsetting performance decline. Therefore, interventions to boost VSTM in older adults might target compensatory frontoparietal representations during memory maintenance, and readout of untapped visual representations at recall.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Lexical surprisal drives pupil dilation during continuous story listening

The pupil famously adjusts its dilation in response to light, but its role extends far beyond this basic sensory function. Its fluctuations index arousal and mental effort, beyond luminance-related dynamics, making it a sensitive marker of internal cognitive states. A growing body of work shows that these pupil-linked signals extend beyond the visual domain. However, which processes drive pupil responses in more naturalistic settings remains unclear as most evidence comes from tightly controlled paradigms that strip away the richness of real-world experience. Language offers a uniquely powerful window into this question, as it can allow us to create rich paradigms without having any visual, i.e. luminance, confounds. Moreover, language comprehension hinges on continuous prediction: listeners constantly generate expectations about upcoming input, and the discrepancy between expectation and actual input - contextual prediction error, or surprisal - carries measurable cognitive costs. Here, we tested the hypothesis that pupil-linked arousal indexes these linguistic surprisal signals during naturalistic listening. We recorded pupil responses while volunteers listened to naturalistic spoken stories in darkness, which were either intact or reversed. Reversed speech preserves the acoustics of the signal while destroying its intelligibility. Pupil dilation selectively tracked lexical surprisal within a late window of 1,700 to 2,350 milliseconds following word onset, in forward, but not control, backward speech. These findings indicate that pupil-linked arousal is tuned to global, context-dependent processing, tracking the cognitive cost of updating a predictive model during naturalistic listening.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Disrupting SORL1-retromer endosomal recycling in mice drives the age-dependent neurodegenerative signature of Alzheimer's disease

MRI studies have mapped the atrophic signature that distinguishes Alzheimer's disease (AD), isolating regions differentially vulnerable to its age-dependent neurodegenerative process. We test the hypothesis that an endosomal recycling pathway regulated by the interaction of SORL1 with retromer, which is pathogenically disrupted in AD, might drive the neurodegenerative process via multiple yearlong studies in over 140 wildtype and SORL1 deficient mice, modeling AD's causative mutations. MRI studies revealed that SORL1 deficiency induced an age-dependent AD-pattern of atrophy, centered on the trans-entorhinal cortex, and that atrophy was prevented by SORL1 restoration, secondary to overexpressing the retromer protein VPS26b. Postmortem studies validated that the atrophy reflects neuronal loss. Proteomic profiling revealed that the atrophy is associated with reductions in cell death suppressors, one of which was then found deficient in the trans-entorhinal cortex of AD patients. Besides supporting the hypothesis, taken together with other findings, the results suggest that SORL1-retromer disruptions represent a therapeutically-amenable common 'neurodegeneration pathway' in AD.

neuroscience↗